The true number density of massive galaxies in the early Universe revealed by JWST/MIRI

AI-generated keywords: Galaxy formation Massive galaxies Early Universe LCDM cosmology Baryon-to-star conversion efficiency

AI-generated Key Points

  • A pressing challenge in galaxy formation is the early assembly of massive galaxies
  • Recent observations show that the number density and maximum stellar mass of these galaxies in the early Universe exceed model predictions
  • Previous studies have been limited by uncertainty in estimating stellar mass due to insufficient constraints in the near-infrared segment of the spectral energy distribution
  • Data from a JWST/MIRI survey within the PRIMER program was used to analyze massive galaxies at redshifts around z ~ 3-8, with findings revealing a decrease in number and mass densities at redshifts beyond 5 compared to earlier results
  • The outcomes suggest a need for an increase in baryon-to-star conversion efficiency towards higher redshifts and larger stellar masses within the standard ΛCDM cosmology framework
  • For the most massive galaxies at approximately z ~ 8, an efficiency value of around 0.3 is required, contrasting with lower values observed in low-redshift galaxies
  • Results align with models suggesting suppressed stellar feedback due to high gas density and short free-fall times expected for massive halos at elevated redshifts
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Tao Wang, Hanwen Sun, Luwenjia Zhou, Ke Xu, Cheng Cheng, Zhaozhou Li, Yangyao Chen, H. J. Mo, Avishai Dekel, Xianzhong Zheng, Zheng Cai, Tiacheng Yang, Y. -S. Dai, David Elbaz, J. -S. Huang

arXiv: 2403.02399v1 - DOI (astro-ph.GA)
23 pages, 10 figures, submitted
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: One of the main challenges in galaxy formation that has emerged recently is the early assembly of massive galaxies. The observed number density and the maximum stellar mass ($M_{\star}$) of massive galaxies in the early Universe appear to be higher than model predictions, which may pose a serious problem to the LCDM cosmology. A major limitation in many previous studies is the large uncertainty in estimating $M_{\star}$ due to the lack of constraints in the rest-frame near-infrared part of the spectral energy distribution, which is critical to determining $M_{\star}$ accurately. Here we use data from a large JWST/MIRI survey in the PRIMER program to carry out a systematic analysis of massive galaxies at $z \sim 3-8$, leveraging photometric constraints at rest-frame $\gtrsim 1 \mu$m. We find a significant reduction in the number and mass densities of massive galaxies at $z > 5$ compared to earlier results that did not use the MIRI photometry. Within the standard $\Lambda$CDM cosmology, our results require a moderate increase in the baryon-to-star conversion efficiency ($\epsilon$) towards higher redshifts and higher $M_{\star}$. For the most massive galaxies at $z\sim 8$, the required $\epsilon$ is $\sim 0.3$, in comparison to $\epsilon \sim 0.14$ for typical low-redshift galaxies. Our findings are consistent with models assuming suppressed stellar feedback due to the high gas density and the associated short free-fall time expected for massive halos at high redshift.

Submitted to arXiv on 04 Mar. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2403.02399v1

In the realm of galaxy formation, a pressing challenge has arisen concerning the early assembly of massive galaxies. Recent observations have revealed that the number density and maximum stellar mass ($M_{\star}$) of these colossal entities in the early Universe surpass model predictions. This poses a significant conundrum for the LCDM cosmology. A key limitation in previous studies has been the substantial uncertainty in estimating $M_{\star}$ due to insufficient constraints in the rest-frame near-infrared segment of the spectral energy distribution. This is crucial for precise determination of $M_{\star}$. To comprehensively address this issue, data from an extensive JWST/MIRI survey within the PRIMER program was utilized to conduct a systematic analysis of massive galaxies at redshifts around $z \sim 3-8$, leveraging photometric constraints at rest-frame wavelengths exceeding 1 $\mu$m. The findings stemming from this rigorous investigation unveil a notable decrease in both number and mass densities of massive galaxies at redshifts beyond 5 when compared to earlier results that did not incorporate MIRI photometry. Within the framework of the standard $\Lambda$CDM cosmology, these outcomes necessitate a moderate augmentation in baryon-to-star conversion efficiency ($\epsilon$) towards higher redshifts and larger $M_{\star}$. Notably, for the most massive galaxies at approximately $z \sim 8$, an $\epsilon$ value of around 0.3 is required. This contrasts with $\epsilon \approx 0.14$, which is typically observed in low-redshift galaxies. The implications drawn from these results align with models postulating suppressed stellar feedback attributable to high gas density and correspondingly short free-fall times anticipated for massive halos at elevated redshifts. This refined analysis sheds light on critical aspects influencing galaxy formation dynamics and underscores the intricate interplay between various factors shaping the evolution of massive galaxies in the early Universe.
Created on 16 Oct. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 1

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.