Benchmarking phonon anharmonicity in machine learning interatomic potentials

AI-generated keywords: Machine learning Anharmonicity Interatomic potentials Crystal structure Molecular dynamics

AI-generated Key Points

  • Machine learning approaches are powerful tools for investigating structure-property relationships in crystals and molecules
  • Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials (MLIP) accurately reproduce first-principles data at a similar cost to traditional interatomic potential methods
  • Lack of clear understanding of anharmonic terms encoded in MLIP despite extensive testing on various materials and molecules
  • Study benchmarked popular MLIP using anharmonic vibrational Hamiltonian of ThO$_2$ in fluorite crystal structure constructed from Density Functional Theory (DFT)
  • Three classes of MLIP were trained: Gaussian Approximation Potentials, Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), and Graph Neural Networks (GNN)
  • Results evaluated by comparing phonons and their interactions, as well as phonon linewidths, lineshifts, and thermal conductivity
  • Models trained on DFT molecular dynamics dataset with good agreement up to fifth-order for both ANN and GNN models
  • Potential of MLIP in accurately characterizing anharmonicity in materials systems at a fraction of the cost compared to conventional first principles-based approaches
  • Specific computational methods utilizing DFT calculations detailed in the study, providing valuable insights into understanding phonon anharmonicity within materials systems
  • Research contributes to advancing understanding of anharmonicity through machine learning interatomic potentials, suggesting they can effectively capture complex structural properties with high accuracy and efficiency
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Sasaank Bandi, Chao Jiang, Chris A. Marianetti

arXiv: 2402.18891v1 - DOI (cond-mat.mtrl-sci)
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Machine learning approaches have recently emerged as powerful tools to probe structure-property relationships in crystals and molecules. Specifically, Machine learning interatomic potentials (MLIP) can accurately reproduce first-principles data at a cost similar to that of conventional interatomic potential approaches. While MLIP have been extensively tested across various classes of materials and molecules, a clear characterization of the anharmonic terms encoded in the MLIP is lacking. Here, we benchmark popular MLIP using the anharmonic vibrational Hamiltonian of ThO$_2$ in the fluorite crystal structure. This anharmonic Hamiltonian was constructed from density functional theory (DFT) using our highly accurate and efficient irreducible derivative methods, and then used to generate molecular dynamics trajectories. This data set was used to train three classes of MLIP: Gaussian Approximation Potentials, Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), and Graph Neural Networks (GNN). The results were assessed by directly comparing phonons and their interactions, as well as phonon linewidths, phonon lineshifts, and thermal conductivity. The models were also trained on a DFT molecular dynamics dataset, demonstrating good agreement up to fifth-order for the ANN and GNN. Our analysis demonstrates that MLIP have great potential for accurately characterizing anharmonicity in materials systems at a fraction of the cost of conventional first principles-based approaches.

Submitted to arXiv on 29 Feb. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2402.18891v1

Machine learning approaches have become powerful tools for investigating structure-property relationships in crystals and molecules. One promising approach is the use of Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials (MLIP), which have shown to accurately reproduce first-principles data at a similar cost to traditional interatomic potential methods. However, there is a lack of clear understanding of the anharmonic terms encoded in MLIP despite extensive testing on various materials and molecules. In a recent study by Sasaank Bandi, Chao Jiang, and Chris A. Marianetti, popular MLIP were benchmarked using the anharmonic vibrational Hamiltonian of ThO$_2$ in the fluorite crystal structure. The Hamiltonian was constructed from Density Functional Theory (DFT) using highly accurate and efficient irreducible derivative methods to generate molecular dynamics trajectories. Three classes of MLIP were trained on this dataset: Gaussian Approximation Potentials, Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), and Graph Neural Networks (GNN). Results were evaluated by comparing phonons and their interactions, as well as phonon linewidths, lineshifts, and thermal conductivity. Additionally, the models were trained on a DFT molecular dynamics dataset with good agreement up to fifth-order for both ANN and GNN models. This analysis highlights the potential of MLIP in accurately characterizing anharmonicity in materials systems at a fraction of the cost compared to conventional first principles-based approaches. Furthermore, specific computational methods utilizing DFT calculations with parameters such as plane-wave basis cutoff energy and k-point mesh densities were detailed in the study. The computation of higher-order derivatives provided valuable insights into understanding phonon anharmonicity within materials systems. In conclusion, this research significantly contributes to advancing our understanding of anharmonicity through machine learning interatomic potentials and suggests that they can effectively capture complex structural properties with high accuracy and efficiency, paving the way for further advancements in material science research.
Created on 05 Mar. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.