Massive Activations in Large Language Models

AI-generated keywords: Large Language Models Massive Activations Neural Networks Attention Bias Self-Attention

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Study by Sun et al. uncovers significant phenomenon in Large Language Models (LLMs): presence of massive activations
  • Massive activations exhibit remarkably larger values than others and are consistently located within the models
  • These massive activations remain constant regardless of input, serving as crucial bias terms influencing attention probabilities and contributing to implicit bias in self-attention outputs
  • Concentration on specific tokens has far-reaching implications for LLM performance and behavior
  • Investigation extends to Vision Transformers, revealing how massive activations manifest in this context
  • Research provides valuable insights into inner workings of large-scale neural networks and emphasizes importance of understanding such phenomena for advancing machine learning technologies
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Mingjie Sun, Xinlei Chen, J. Zico Kolter, Zhuang Liu

Website at https://eric-mingjie.github.io/massive-activations/index.html

Abstract: We observe an empirical phenomenon in Large Language Models (LLMs) -- very few activations exhibit significantly larger values than others (e.g., 100,000 times larger). We call them massive activations. First, we demonstrate the widespread existence of massive activations across various LLMs and characterize their locations. Second, we find their values largely stay constant regardless of the input, and they function as indispensable bias terms in LLMs. Third, these massive activations lead to the concentration of attention probabilities to their corresponding tokens, and further, implicit bias terms in the self-attention output. Last, we also study massive activations in Vision Transformers.

Submitted to arXiv on 27 Feb. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2402.17762v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The study "Massive Activations in Large Language Models" by Sun et al. uncovers a significant phenomenon observed in Large Language Models (LLMs) - the presence of massive activations. These activations exhibit remarkably larger values than others and are consistently located within the models. The researchers also find that these massive activations remain constant regardless of input, serving as crucial bias terms that influence attention probabilities and contribute to implicit bias in self-attention outputs. This concentration on specific tokens has far-reaching implications for LLM performance and behavior. The study extends its investigation to Vision Transformers, shedding light on how massive activations manifest in this context. Overall, this research provides valuable insights into the inner workings of large-scale neural networks and highlights the importance of understanding such phenomena for advancing machine learning technologies.
Created on 28 Feb. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.