Neural optimal controller for stochastic systems via pathwise HJB operator
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- The paper focuses on developing deep learning-based algorithms for high-dimensional stochastic control problems.
- Utilizes physics-informed learning and dynamic programming techniques.
- Introduces a pathwise operator associated with the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (HJB) equation, offering a new perspective on tackling stochastic control problems.
- Presents two numerical methods for solving the physics-informed learning problem based on the explicit representation of optimal control.
- Provides an error analysis to assess the impact of truncation, approximation, and optimization errors on method accuracy.
- Showcases numerical results across various applications to demonstrate algorithm effectiveness and performance.
- Advances deep learning approaches in addressing complex stochastic control problems by incorporating principles of physics-informed learning and dynamic programming concepts.
Authors: Zhe Jiao, Xiaoyan Luo, Xinlei Yi
Abstract: The aim of this work is to develop deep learning-based algorithms for high-dimensional stochastic control problems based on physics-informed learning and dynamic programming. Unlike classical deep learning-based methods relying on a probabilistic representation of the solution to the Hamilton--Jacobi--Bellman (HJB) equation, we introduce a pathwise operator associated with the HJB equation so that we can define a problem of physics-informed learning. According to whether the optimal control has an explicit representation, two numerical methods are proposed to solve the physics-informed learning problem. We provide an error analysis on how the truncation, approximation and optimization errors affect the accuracy of these methods. Numerical results on various applications are presented to illustrate the performance of the proposed algorithms.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.