A First Look at GPT Apps: Landscape and Vulnerability

AI-generated keywords: GPT apps LLM app stores OpenAI's introduction of GPTs

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Dedicated LLM app stores have emerged in response to the proliferation of GPT apps, such as \textit{GPTStore.AI} and the official \textit{OpenAI GPT Store}.
  • There is a significant lack of understanding regarding the evolution and vulnerabilities of this new ecosystem.
  • A comprehensive longitudinal study spanning over 5 months was conducted to analyze the emerging LLM app ecosystem by examining metadata and user feedback for all GPT apps across these two prominent stores.
  • Configurations, including system prompts, knowledge files, and APIs for the top 10,000 popular apps were analyzed using automated tools and a TriLevel configuration extraction strategy.
  • Findings reveal an increase in user enthusiasm for GPT apps over time but a plateau in creator interest within three months of launch.
  • Nearly 90% of system prompts can be easily accessed due to inadequate security measures, leading to instances of plagiarism and duplication among apps within the ecosystem.
  • Urgent enhancements are needed within the LLM app ecosystem by stakeholders to ensure sustainable growth and development.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Zejun Zhang, Li Zhang, Xin Yuan, Anlan Zhang, Mengwei Xu, Feng Qian

Abstract: Following OpenAI's introduction of GPTs, a surge in GPT apps has led to the launch of dedicated LLM app stores. Nevertheless, given its debut, there is a lack of sufficient understanding of this new ecosystem. To fill this gap, this paper presents a first comprehensive longitudinal (5-month) study of the evolution, landscape, and vulnerability of the emerging LLM app ecosystem, focusing on two GPT app stores: \textit{GPTStore.AI} and the official \textit{OpenAI GPT Store}. Specifically, we develop two automated tools and a TriLevel configuration extraction strategy to efficiently gather metadata (\ie names, creators, descriptions, \etc) and user feedback for all GPT apps across these two stores, as well as configurations (\ie system prompts, knowledge files, and APIs) for the top 10,000 popular apps. Our extensive analysis reveals: (1) the user enthusiasm for GPT apps consistently rises, whereas creator interest plateaus within three months of GPTs' launch; (2) nearly 90\% system prompts can be easily accessed due to widespread failure to secure GPT app configurations, leading to considerable plagiarism and duplication among apps. Our findings highlight the necessity of enhancing the LLM app ecosystem by the app stores, creators, and users.

Submitted to arXiv on 23 Feb. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2402.15105v2

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In response to the proliferation of GPT apps following OpenAI's introduction of GPTs, dedicated LLM app stores have emerged. These include \textit{GPTStore.AI} and the official \textit{OpenAI GPT Store}. However, despite the rapid growth of this new ecosystem, there remains a significant lack of understanding regarding its evolution and vulnerabilities. To address this gap in knowledge, this paper presents a comprehensive longitudinal study spanning over 5 months. The study focuses on analyzing the emerging LLM app ecosystem by examining metadata (such as names, creators, descriptions) and user feedback for all GPT apps across these two prominent stores. Additionally, configurations including system prompts, knowledge files and APIs for the top 10 000 popular apps are also analyzed using automated tools and a TriLevel configuration extraction strategy. The findings from this extensive analysis reveal intriguing trends within the LLM app ecosystem. Firstly there is a noticeable increase in user enthusiasm for GPT apps over time. Conversely creator interest appears to plateau within three months of the initial launch of GPTs. Furthermore a concerning discovery indicates that nearly 90% of system prompts can be easily accessed due to inadequate security measures in place for GPT app configurations. This vulnerability has led to instances of plagiarism and duplication among apps within the ecosystem. Overall these findings underscore the urgent need for enhancements within the LLM app ecosystem by all stakeholders involved - including app stores creators and users. By addressing these vulnerabilities and fostering a more secure environment for innovation and creativity with GPT apps it is possible to ensure sustainable growth and development within this rapidly evolving landscape.
Created on 27 Oct. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.