Benchmarking and Dissecting the Nvidia Hopper GPU Architecture

AI-generated keywords: GPU architectures

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Demand for computational power in GPUs driven by AI and deep learning workloads
  • Introduction of Hopper GPUs with unique features like tensor cores supporting FP8, DPX, and distributed shared memory
  • Proposal for a benchmarking study focusing on Nvidia Hopper GPU architecture to unravel microarchitectural complexities
  • Two key aspects of the study: traditional latency and throughput comparison benchmarks across recent GPU architectures, in-depth exploration of novel features introduced by Hopper GPUs
  • Focus on Hopper DPX dynamic programming instruction set, distributed shared memory capabilities, and integration of FP8 tensor cores
  • Aim to enhance software optimization strategies and modeling efforts tailored for GPU architectures through deeper understanding of AI function units and programming features in Hopper architecture
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Weile Luo, Ruibo Fan, Zeyu Li, Dayou Du, Qiang Wang, Xiaowen Chu

Abstract: Graphics processing units (GPUs) are continually evolving to cater to the computational demands of contemporary general-purpose workloads, particularly those driven by artificial intelligence (AI) utilizing deep learning techniques. A substantial body of studies have been dedicated to dissecting the microarchitectural metrics characterizing diverse GPU generations, which helps researchers understand the hardware details and leverage them to optimize the GPU programs. However, the latest Hopper GPUs present a set of novel attributes, including new tensor cores supporting FP8, DPX, and distributed shared memory. Their details still remain mysterious in terms of performance and operational characteristics. In this research, we propose an extensive benchmarking study focused on the Hopper GPU. The objective is to unveil its microarchitectural intricacies through an examination of the new instruction-set architecture (ISA) of Nvidia GPUs and the utilization of new CUDA APIs. Our approach involves two main aspects. Firstly, we conduct conventional latency and throughput comparison benchmarks across the three most recent GPU architectures, namely Hopper, Ada, and Ampere. Secondly, we delve into a comprehensive discussion and benchmarking of the latest Hopper features, encompassing the Hopper DPX dynamic programming (DP) instruction set, distributed shared memory, and the availability of FP8 tensor cores. The microbenchmarking results we present offer a deeper understanding of the novel GPU AI function units and programming features introduced by the Hopper architecture. This newfound understanding is expected to greatly facilitate software optimization and modeling efforts for GPU architectures. To the best of our knowledge, this study makes the first attempt to demystify the tensor core performance and programming instruction sets unique to Hopper GPUs.

Submitted to arXiv on 21 Feb. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2402.13499v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

, , , , In the rapidly evolving landscape of graphics processing units (GPUs), the demand for computational power to support modern general-purpose workloads, especially those rooted in artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning techniques, continues to drive innovation. A significant body of research has been dedicated to analyzing the microarchitectural characteristics of various GPU generations, providing valuable insights for optimizing GPU programs. However, with the introduction of the latest Hopper GPUs, a new frontier emerges with unique features such as tensor cores supporting FP8, DPX, and distributed shared memory. Despite these advancements, there remains a veil of mystery surrounding the performance and operational intricacies of these cutting-edge GPUs. In response to this challenge, a comprehensive benchmarking study focusing on the Nvidia Hopper GPU architecture has been proposed. The primary objective is to unravel the microarchitectural complexities by examining the new instruction-set architecture (ISA) specific to Nvidia GPUs and leveraging new CUDA APIs. This approach encompasses two key aspects: firstly, conducting traditional latency and throughput comparison benchmarks across recent GPU architectures including Hopper, Ada, and Ampere; secondly, delving into an in-depth exploration and benchmarking of the novel features introduced by Hopper GPUs. Specifically, this research delves into the Hopper DPX dynamic programming (DP) instruction set, distributed shared memory capabilities, and integration of FP8 tensor cores. Through meticulous microbenchmarking analysis, a deeper understanding of the unique AI function units and programming features inherent in the Hopper architecture is achieved. This newfound knowledge is poised to significantly enhance software optimization strategies and modeling efforts tailored for GPU architectures. Notably,this study represents a pioneering effort in demystifying performance nuances and programming intricacies associated with tensor cores exclusive to Hopper GPUs. Authored by Weile Luo, Ruibo Fan, Zeyu Li, Dayou Du, Qiang Wang, and Xiaowen Chu underlines their commitment to advancing our comprehension of cutting-edge GPU technologies for future advancements in AI-driven computing paradigms.
Created on 20 Apr. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.