The morphological mix of dwarf galaxies in the nearby Universe

AI-generated keywords: Dwarf galaxies Morphological mix Low-density environments Interactions Formation histories

AI-generated Key Points

  • Study focuses on census of dwarf galaxies in low-density environments outside local neighborhood
  • Utilizes sample of 257 dwarf galaxies with stellar masses ranging from 10^8 MSun to 10^9.5 MSun at redshifts less than 0.08
  • Identifies three principal morphological classes among dwarf galaxies: early-type (elliptical/S0), late-type (spiral), and featureless
  • Reveals that 43% exhibit traditional 'early-type' morphology, 45% exhibit 'late-type' morphology, and 10% belong to a 'featureless' class
  • Interactions play significant role in around 20% of overall star formation activity in dwarf population, with evidence present for each morphological class
  • Differences observed between dwarf early-types and massive counterparts suggest distinct formation histories influenced by secular processes rather than interactions
  • Featureless dwarfs in low-density environments may be formed through internal baryonic feedback rather than environmental processes
  • Distinguishing between early and late-type dwarfs using traditional morphological parameters proves challenging unlike in the massive-galaxy regime
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Ilin Lazar, Sugata Kaviraj, Aaron E. Watkins, Garreth Martin, Brian Bichang'a, Ryan A. Jackson

arXiv: 2402.12440v1 - DOI (astro-ph.GA)
Accepted for publication in MNRAS, 20 pages, 19 figures
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: We use a complete, unbiased sample of 257 dwarf (10^8 MSun < Mstar < 10^9.5 MSun) galaxies at z < 0.08, to study the morphological mix of the dwarf population in low-density environments. Visual inspection of extremely deep optical images and their unsharp-masked counterparts reveals three principal dwarf morphological classes. 43 and 45 per cent of dwarfs exhibit the traditional `early-type' (elliptical/S0) and `late-type' (spiral) morphologies respectively. However, 10 per cent populate a `featureless' class, that lacks both the central light concentration seen in early-types and any spiral structure - this class is missing in the massive-galaxy regime. 14, 27, 19 per cent of early-type, late-type and featureless dwarfs respectively show evidence for interactions, which drive around 20 per cent of the overall star formation activity in the dwarf population. Compared to their massive counterparts, dwarf early-types show a much lower incidence of interactions, are significantly less concentrated and share similar rest-frame colours as dwarf late-types. This suggests that the formation histories of dwarf and massive early-types are different, with dwarf early-types being shaped less by interactions and more by secular processes. The lack of large groups or clusters in COSMOS at z < 0.08, and the fact that our dwarf morphological classes show similar local density, suggests that featureless dwarfs in low-density environments are created via internal baryonic feedback, rather than by environmental processes. Finally, while interacting dwarfs can be identified using the asymmetry parameter, it is challenging to cleanly separate early and late-type dwarfs using traditional morphological parameters, such as `CAS', M20 and the Gini coefficient (unlike in the massive-galaxy regime).

Submitted to arXiv on 19 Feb. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2402.12440v1

This study provides a detailed census of the morphological mix of dwarf galaxies in low-density environments outside the local neighborhood. The research utilizes a complete and unbiased sample of 257 dwarf galaxies with stellar masses ranging from 10^8 MSun to 10^9.5 MSun at redshifts less than 0.08. Through visual inspection of deep optical images and their unsharp-masked counterparts, three principal morphological classes are identified among dwarf galaxies: early-type (elliptical/S0), late-type (spiral), and featureless. Interestingly, 10% of dwarfs belong to a 'featureless' class that lacks central light concentration seen in early-types or any spiral structure - a class not observed in massive galaxies. The analysis reveals that 43% and 45% of dwarfs exhibit traditional 'early-type' and 'late-type' morphologies respectively. Additionally, interactions are found to play a significant role in around 20% of overall star formation activity in the dwarf population, with evidence present in different proportions for each morphological class. Comparing dwarf early-types to their massive counterparts reveals differences in interaction incidence and concentration levels, suggesting distinct formation histories influenced by secular processes rather than interactions for dwarf early-types. Furthermore, the absence of large groups or clusters at z < 0.08 in COSMOS indicates that featureless dwarfs in low-density environments may be formed through internal baryonic feedback rather than environmental processes. While interacting dwarfs can be identified using asymmetry parameters, distinguishing between early and late-type dwarfs using traditional morphological parameters like CAS, M20, and the Gini coefficient proves challenging unlike in the massive-galaxy regime. This paper is organized into sections detailing datasets used for analysis, exploration of dwarf morphology through visual inspection and morphological parameters comparison with massive galaxies. The findings shed light on the evolution of different dwarf morphological classes within low-density environments outside our local neighborhood.
Created on 21 Feb. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.