Bridging the Empirical-Theoretical Gap in Neural Network Formal Language Learning Using Minimum Description Length

AI-generated keywords: Neural Networks

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Authors Nur Lan, Emmanuel Chemla, and Roni Katzir address challenges in neural networks achieving perfect generalization
  • Theoretical evidence suggests certain architectures can express ideal solutions, but common objectives do not align with correct solutions in a formal language task
  • Regularization techniques and meta-heuristics like L1/L2 norms, early-stopping, and dropout fall short of optimal performance
  • Proposal of a novel approach using Minimum Description Length (MDL) objective leads to the discovery that the correct solution becomes an optimum
  • Bridging the gap between empirical results and theoretical expectations in neural network formal language learning
  • Redefining objectives can enhance model performance and optimize neural network architectures for improved generalization and efficiency
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Nur Lan, Emmanuel Chemla, Roni Katzir

9 pages, 5 figures, 3 appendix pages

Abstract: Neural networks offer good approximation to many tasks but consistently fail to reach perfect generalization, even when theoretical work shows that such perfect solutions can be expressed by certain architectures. Using the task of formal language learning, we focus on one simple formal language and show that the theoretically correct solution is in fact not an optimum of commonly used objectives -- even with regularization techniques that according to common wisdom should lead to simple weights and good generalization (L1, L2) or other meta-heuristics (early-stopping, dropout). However, replacing standard targets with the Minimum Description Length objective (MDL) results in the correct solution being an optimum.

Submitted to arXiv on 15 Feb. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2402.10013v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their paper titled "Bridging the Empirical-Theoretical Gap in Neural Network Formal Language Learning Using Minimum Description Length," authors Nur Lan, Emmanuel Chemla, and Roni Katzir address the challenges faced by neural networks in achieving perfect generalization. Despite theoretical evidence suggesting that certain architectures can express ideal solutions, the authors highlight a simple formal language task where commonly used objectives do not align with the theoretically correct solution. Even with regularization techniques like L1 and L2 norms or meta-heuristics such as early-stopping and dropout, neural networks fall short of optimal performance. However, the authors propose a novel approach by replacing standard targets with the Minimum Description Length (MDL) objective. This shift leads to the discovery that the correct solution becomes an optimum, effectively bridging the gap between empirical results and theoretical expectations in neural network formal language learning. Through their research, Lan, Chemla, and Katzir shed light on how redefining objectives can enhance model performance and pave the way for more effective utilization of neural networks in complex tasks. Their findings offer valuable insights into optimizing neural network architectures for improved generalization and efficiency in various applications within the field of artificial intelligence.
Created on 23 Feb. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.