Optimal score estimation via empirical Bayes smoothing
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Authors: Andre Wibisono, Yihong Wu, Kaylee Yingxi Yang
- Problem: Estimating score function of unknown probability distribution $\rho^*$ from $n$ observations in $d$ dimensions
- Assumptions: $\rho^*$ is subgaussian with Lipschitz-continuous score function $s^*$
- Optimal rate: $\tilde \Theta(n^{-\frac{2}{d+4}})$ under loss function $\|\hat s - s^*\|^2_{L^2(\rho^*)}$
- Curse of dimensionality: Sample complexity grows exponentially with dimension $d$
- Approach: Leveraging empirical Bayes theory, introducing new convergence rate in Hellinger distance
- Result: Regularized score estimator based on Gaussian kernel achieves optimal rate supported by minimax lower bound
- Implications: Study impacts sample complexity of score-based generative models in high-dimensional settings
Authors: Andre Wibisono, Yihong Wu, Kaylee Yingxi Yang
Abstract: We study the problem of estimating the score function of an unknown probability distribution $\rho^*$ from $n$ independent and identically distributed observations in $d$ dimensions. Assuming that $\rho^*$ is subgaussian and has a Lipschitz-continuous score function $s^*$, we establish the optimal rate of $\tilde \Theta(n^{-\frac{2}{d+4}})$ for this estimation problem under the loss function $\|\hat s - s^*\|^2_{L^2(\rho^*)}$ that is commonly used in the score matching literature, highlighting the curse of dimensionality where sample complexity for accurate score estimation grows exponentially with the dimension $d$. Leveraging key insights in empirical Bayes theory as well as a new convergence rate of smoothed empirical distribution in Hellinger distance, we show that a regularized score estimator based on a Gaussian kernel attains this rate, shown optimal by a matching minimax lower bound. We also discuss the implication of our theory on the sample complexity of score-based generative models.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 1
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.