Towards Robotic Companions: Understanding Handler-Guide Dog Interactions for Informed Guide Dog Robot Design

AI-generated keywords: guide dog robot user-driven insights handler-guide dog interaction mobile robots design implications

AI-generated Key Points

  • Researchers aimed to bridge the gap between guide dog robot developers and stakeholders by gaining user-driven insights into handler-guide dog interactions.
  • Key findings from semi-structured interviews with 23 guide dog handlers and 5 professional guide dog trainers revealed limitations in handler-guide dog interaction, the importance of continuous interactions to fulfill handlers' needs, and handlers' perspectives on guide dog robots.
  • The study offers unique insights into guide dog robot development, filling a knowledge gap in understanding users' requirements with respect to mobile robots.
  • Design implications for guide dog robots include considerations for form factor such as leg length, dimensions, weight, protective features, appearance, waterproofing, dustproofing, thermal management, and personalization according to users' needs.
  • Future research directions include advancing interactions between handlers and guide dog robots during navigation tasks in complex environments and establishing objective measures of the robot's performance through controlled user studies.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Hochul Hwang, Hee-Tae Jung, Nicholas A Giudice, Joydeep Biswas, Sunghoon Ivan Lee, Donghyun Kim

License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Abstract: Dog guides are favored by blind and low-vision (BLV) individuals for their ability to enhance independence and confidence by reducing safety concerns and increasing navigation efficiency compared to traditional mobility aids. However, only a relatively small proportion of BLV individuals work with dog guides due to their limited availability and associated maintenance responsibilities. There is considerable recent interest in addressing this challenge by developing legged guide dog robots. This study was designed to determine critical aspects of the handler-guide dog interaction and better understand handler needs to inform guide dog robot development. We conducted semi-structured interviews and observation sessions with 23 dog guide handlers and 5 trainers. Thematic analysis revealed critical limitations in guide dog work, desired personalization in handler-guide dog interaction, and important perspectives on future guide dog robots. Grounded on these findings, we discuss pivotal design insights for guide dog robots aimed for adoption within the BLV community.

Submitted to arXiv on 09 Feb. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2402.06790v1

In this study, researchers aimed to bridge the gap between guide dog robot developers and stakeholders by gaining user-driven insights into handler-guide dog interactions. Through semi-structured interviews with 23 guide dog handlers and 5 professional guide dog trainers, key findings crucial for guide dog robot design were revealed. These findings encompassed limitations in handler-guide dog interaction, the importance of continuous interactions to fulfill handlers’ needs, and handlers’ perspectives on guide dog robots. This paper offers unique insights into guide dog robot development, filling a knowledge gap in understanding users’ requirements with respect to mobile robots. While previous studies have focused on the capabilities and limitations of guide dogs and the interaction between assistive devices and BLV individuals, efforts to analyze users’ perspectives in designing mobile robots have been sparse. This study aims to address this gap by drawing on real-world experiences of stakeholders. The discussion in the paper consolidates key aspects of robot development, integrating findings with existing research and suggesting design considerations that encompass hardware, perception, and interface facets of a guide dog robot. Design implications include considerations for form factor such as leg length, dimensions, weight, protective features, appearance, waterproofing, dustproofing, thermal management, and personalization according to users' needs. Moving forward, future research directions include advancing interactions between handlers and guide dog robots during navigation tasks in complex environments. Objective measures of the robot’s performance and its impact on users’ daily lives will be established through controlled and in situ user studies with BLV individuals. Additionally,<fd>personalization</fd> will be prioritized to accommodate the unique needs <fd>and preferences</fd>of guide dog handlers.
Created on 04 Nov. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.