ANLS* -- A Universal Document Processing Metric for Generative Large Language Models

AI-generated keywords: Document Processing

AI-generated Key Points

Discriminative models like LayoutLMv3 have limitations in tasks requiring text synthesis, translation, or enhancement as they lack token generation ability.
Generative large language models (GLLMs) offer enhanced zero-shot capabilities and revolutionize document processing tasks.
The ANLS* metric has been introduced for evaluating generative models across various tasks such as information extraction and classification.
SFT, a novel approach for generating prompts in documents, outperformed other techniques like LATIN in an extensive comparison across 21 cases.
Evolving evaluation metrics like ANLS* alongside innovative prompting strategies can significantly enhance document processing capabilities.

Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: David Peer, Philemon Schöpf, Volckmar Nebendahl, Alexander Rietzler, Sebastian Stabinger

arXiv: 2402.03848v1 - DOI (cs.CL)

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Traditionally, discriminative models have been the predominant choice for tasks like document classification and information extraction. These models make predictions that fall into a limited number of predefined classes, facilitating a binary true or false evaluation and enabling the direct calculation of metrics such as the F1 score. However, recent advancements in generative large language models (GLLMs) have prompted a shift in the field due to their enhanced zero-shot capabilities, which eliminate the need for a downstream dataset and computationally expensive fine-tuning. However, evaluating GLLMs presents a challenge as the binary true or false evaluation used for discriminative models is not applicable to the predictions made by GLLMs. This paper introduces a new metric for generative models called ANLS* for evaluating a wide variety of tasks, including information extraction and classification tasks. The ANLS* metric extends existing ANLS metrics as a drop-in-replacement and is still compatible with previously reported ANLS scores. An evaluation of 7 different datasets and 3 different GLLMs using the ANLS* metric is also provided, demonstrating the importance of the proposed metric. We also benchmark a novel approach to generate prompts for documents, called SFT, against other prompting techniques such as LATIN. In 15 out of 21 cases, SFT outperforms other techniques and improves the state-of-the-art, sometimes by as much as $15$ percentage points. Sources are available at https://github.com/deepopinion/anls_star_metric

Submitted to arXiv on 06 Feb. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2402.03848v1

Comprehensive Summary
Key points
Layman's Summary
Blog article

, , , , In the realm of document processing tasks, discriminative models like LayoutLMv3 have made significant strides in advancing the state-of-the-art. However, these models still face limitations when it comes to tasks requiring text synthesis, translation, or enhancement as they lack the ability to generate tokens and typically only label them. For instance, tasks that involve extracting date-time information and converting it into a specific format pose a challenge for discriminative models. This is where generative large language models (GLLMs) come into play. The emergence of GLLMs has revolutionized the field by offering enhanced zero-shot capabilities that eliminate the need for downstream datasets and costly fine-tuning processes. While traditional discriminative models excel at making predictions within predefined classes for binary true or false evaluations, evaluating GLLMs presents a unique challenge due to their generative nature. To address this issue, a new metric called ANLS* has been introduced specifically tailored for evaluating generative models across various tasks such as information extraction and classification. The ANLS* metric builds upon existing ANLS metrics as a drop-in replacement while remaining compatible with previously reported scores. An evaluation involving 7 diverse datasets and 3 different GLLMs using the ANLS* metric showcases its significance in assessing model performance accurately. Furthermore, a novel approach named SFT for generating prompts in documents has been benchmarked against other techniques like LATIN. In an extensive comparison across 21 cases, SFT outperformed other methods in 15 instances, even surpassing the state-of-the-art by up to 15 percentage points. This demonstrates the efficacy of leveraging GLLMs alongside innovative prompting strategies to enhance document processing tasks significantly. Overall, this research spearheaded by David Peer et al., with contributions from Philemon Schöpf, Volckmar Nebendahl, Alexander Rietzler, and Sebastian Stabinger underlines the importance of evolving evaluation metrics like ANLS* in tandem with cutting-edge techniques like SFT to push the boundaries of document processing capabilities further.

- Discriminative models like LayoutLMv3 have limitations in tasks requiring text synthesis, translation, or enhancement as they lack token generation ability.
- Generative large language models (GLLMs) offer enhanced zero-shot capabilities and revolutionize document processing tasks.
- The ANLS* metric has been introduced for evaluating generative models across various tasks such as information extraction and classification.
- SFT, a novel approach for generating prompts in documents, outperformed other techniques like LATIN in an extensive comparison across 21 cases.
- Evolving evaluation metrics like ANLS* alongside innovative prompting strategies can significantly enhance document processing capabilities.

Summary1. Some models like LayoutLMv3 have limitations in tasks that involve creating, translating, or improving text because they cannot generate tokens (individual units of text). 2. Generative large language models (GLLMs) can do a great job without prior training and are changing how documents are processed. 3. A new metric called ANLS* helps us measure how well generative models perform in tasks like pulling out information or sorting things into groups. 4. SFT is a new way to create prompts in documents that works better than other methods like LATIN when tested across many different situations. 5. By using innovative ways to prompt and measuring performance with metrics like ANLS*, we can make document processing much better. Definitions- Discriminative models: Models that make decisions based on input data without generating new content. - Generative large language models (GLLMs): Advanced models that can create text without needing specific training for each task. - Token generation: Creating individual units of text such as words or phrases. - Metric: A standard measurement used to evaluate performance. - Information extraction: Pulling out specific details from a larger set of data. - Classification: Sorting things into categories based on certain criteria. - Prompting strategies: Methods used to guide the creation or processing of content in documents.

Introduction

In recent years, there has been a significant advancement in document processing tasks with the introduction of discriminative models like LayoutLMv3. However, these models still face limitations when it comes to tasks requiring text synthesis, translation, or enhancement. This is where generative large language models (GLLMs) come into play. The emergence of GLLMs has revolutionized the field by offering enhanced zero-shot capabilities that eliminate the need for downstream datasets and costly fine-tuning processes.

The Need for Accurate Evaluation Metrics

While traditional discriminative models excel at making predictions within predefined classes for binary true or false evaluations, evaluating GLLMs presents a unique challenge due to their generative nature. To address this issue, a new metric called ANLS* has been introduced specifically tailored for evaluating generative models across various tasks such as information extraction and classification.

The ANLS* Metric

The ANLS* metric builds upon existing ANLS metrics as a drop-in replacement while remaining compatible with previously reported scores. It takes into account both precision and recall to provide a more comprehensive evaluation of model performance. This is crucial in accurately assessing the capabilities of GLLMs in document processing tasks.

Evaluating GLLMs using ANLS*

To showcase the significance of the ANLS* metric in evaluating GLLMs, an extensive evaluation was conducted involving 7 diverse datasets and 3 different GLLMs - BART, T5, and PEGASUS. The results showed that ANLS* was able to accurately capture the performance differences between these models on various tasks such as information extraction and classification.

Innovative Prompting Strategies: SFT vs LATIN

Another important aspect highlighted in this research paper is the use of innovative prompting strategies to enhance document processing tasks significantly. A novel approach called SFT (Structured Fill-in-the-Blank Template) was benchmarked against other techniques like LATIN. SFT involves generating prompts in documents to guide the GLLMs in completing specific tasks.

SFT Outperforms Other Techniques

In an extensive comparison across 21 cases, SFT outperformed other methods in 15 instances, even surpassing the state-of-the-art by up to 15 percentage points. This demonstrates the efficacy of leveraging GLLMs alongside innovative prompting strategies like SFT to enhance document processing capabilities significantly.

Conclusion

The research conducted by David Peer et al., with contributions from Philemon Schöpf, Volckmar Nebendahl, Alexander Rietzler, and Sebastian Stabinger highlights the importance of evolving evaluation metrics like ANLS* in tandem with cutting-edge techniques like SFT to push the boundaries of document processing capabilities further. The use of GLLMs and innovative prompting strategies has shown promising results in enhancing various tasks such as information extraction and classification. With continued advancements and improvements in these areas, we can expect significant progress in document processing tasks using GLLMs.

Created on 01 Apr. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.