Determinants of well-being

AI-generated keywords: Well-being European social policies Subjective indicators Governance Public policy decisions

AI-generated Key Points

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

European social policies traditionally focus on material well-being and social justice
Governance plays a crucial role in shaping well-being
Political systems and institutions significantly impact individuals' well-being
Advocacy for incorporating subjective indicators into public policy decisions
Importance of considering both objective and subjective dimensions in measuring well-being for a holistic approach
Individuals' perceptions and experiences are vital in determining overall well-being
Integration of subjective indicators into policy-making processes can address diverse needs and preferences, leading to more effective social policies
Broadening understanding of well-being beyond material aspects is necessary
Incorporating subjective measures can create more responsive and equitable governance structures
Nuanced approach to measuring well-being can lead to greater individual satisfaction, social cohesion, and overall prosperity

Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Cristina Pereira, Hermínia Gonçalves, Teresa Sequeira

arXiv: 2401.17047v1 - DOI (econ.GN)

23 pages, 4 figures, 5 tables

License: NONEXCLUSIVE-DISTRIB 1.0

Abstract: Traditionally, European social policies have focused on material well-being and social justice, neglecting subjective indicators. This review systematically examines the scientific understanding of well-being, its indicators, and its relationship with governance. It suggests that political systems and institutions significantly impact well-being, and that subjective indicators should be incorporated into public policy decisions. The findings advocate for a more holistic approach to well-being measurement, encompassing both objective and subjective dimensions.

Submitted to arXiv on 30 Jan. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2401.17047v1

⚠This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

Comprehensive Summary
Key points
Layman's Summary
Blog article

In their paper "Determinants of well-being," authors Cristina Pereira, Hermínia Gonçalves, and Teresa Sequeira delve into the traditional focus of European social policies on material well-being and social justice. The review systematically explores the scientific understanding of well-being and its various indicators, highlighting the crucial role that governance plays in shaping it. The authors argue that political systems and institutions have a significant impact on individuals' well-being and advocate for the incorporation of subjective indicators into public policy decisions. By emphasizing the importance of considering both objective and subjective dimensions in measuring well-being, the findings suggest a more holistic approach to assessing societal welfare. This comprehensive perspective acknowledges that individuals' perceptions and experiences play a vital role in determining overall well-being. By integrating subjective indicators into policy-making processes, policymakers can better address the diverse needs and preferences of their populations, ultimately leading to more effective and inclusive social policies. Overall, this research highlights the necessity of broadening our understanding of well-being beyond purely material aspects. It underscores the importance of incorporating subjective measures to create more responsive and equitable governance structures. Through this nuanced approach to measuring well-being, societies can strive towards greater levels of individual satisfaction, social cohesion, and overall prosperity.

- European social policies traditionally focus on material well-being and social justice
- Governance plays a crucial role in shaping well-being
- Political systems and institutions significantly impact individuals' well-being
- Advocacy for incorporating subjective indicators into public policy decisions
- Importance of considering both objective and subjective dimensions in measuring well-being for a holistic approach
- Individuals' perceptions and experiences are vital in determining overall well-being
- Integration of subjective indicators into policy-making processes can address diverse needs and preferences, leading to more effective social policies
- Broadening understanding of well-being beyond material aspects is necessary
- Incorporating subjective measures can create more responsive and equitable governance structures
- Nuanced approach to measuring well-being can lead to greater individual satisfaction, social cohesion, and overall prosperity

Summary- European social policies focus on making sure people have what they need and treating everyone fairly. - Governance, which means how decisions are made and carried out, is very important for people's well-being. - Political systems and institutions, which are the rules and organizations that help run a country, can affect how happy and healthy people are. - It's suggested to include personal feelings and thoughts when making decisions about public policies. - Looking at both facts and feelings when measuring well-being can help make sure everyone's needs are met. Definitions- Material well-being: Having enough things like food, clothes, and a safe place to live. - Social justice: Treating everyone fairly and equally in society. - Governance: How decisions are made and put into action in a group or organization. - Political systems: The way a country is organized to make laws and run the government. - Institutions: Organizations or groups that have an important role in society.

Introduction In recent years, there has been a growing recognition of the limitations of traditional measures of societal progress, such as GDP, in capturing the overall well-being and quality of life of individuals. As a result, there has been an increasing focus on understanding and measuring well-being beyond purely economic indicators. In their paper "Determinants of well-being," authors Cristina Pereira, Hermínia Gonçalves, and Teresa Sequeira delve into this topic by examining the determinants of well-being and advocating for a more holistic approach to assessing societal welfare. Traditional Focus on Material Well-Being The authors begin by highlighting the traditional focus of European social policies on material well-being and social justice. They argue that while these policies have undoubtedly improved living standards for many individuals, they fail to capture other important dimensions that contribute to overall well-being. This narrow focus on material aspects neglects subjective experiences and perceptions that are crucial in determining individual satisfaction with life. Exploring Indicators of Well-Being To address this gap in understanding, the authors systematically review various indicators used to measure well-being. These include objective measures such as income levels, employment rates, education levels, health outcomes, and housing conditions. However, they also emphasize the importance of incorporating subjective indicators such as life satisfaction surveys and self-reported happiness levels. The Role of Governance One key finding from this research is the significant impact that governance structures have on individuals' well-being. The authors highlight how political systems and institutions can shape people's lives through their policies and decision-making processes. They argue that effective governance is essential for promoting social justice and creating an environment conducive to individual flourishing. Incorporating Subjective Indicators into Public Policy Decisions Based on their findings, Pereira et al. advocate for the incorporation of subjective indicators into public policy decisions. By considering both objective data and individuals' perceptions and experiences when making policy choices, policymakers can better address the diverse needs and preferences of their populations. This approach can lead to more responsive and inclusive social policies that promote well-being for all. A More Holistic Approach to Measuring Well-Being Overall, this research highlights the necessity of broadening our understanding of well-being beyond purely material aspects. It underscores the importance of incorporating subjective measures to create more responsive and equitable governance structures. By taking a more comprehensive perspective on well-being, societies can strive towards greater levels of individual satisfaction, social cohesion, and overall prosperity. Conclusion In conclusion, Pereira et al.'s paper "Determinants of well-being" provides valuable insights into the complex nature of well-being and its various indicators. The authors' emphasis on the role of governance in shaping individuals' lives is particularly relevant in today's world where political systems have a significant impact on people's daily experiences. By advocating for a more holistic approach to measuring well-being, this research calls for policymakers to consider both objective and subjective dimensions when making decisions that affect society as a whole. Ultimately, by prioritizing individual satisfaction and promoting social justice through effective governance structures, we can work towards creating a happier and healthier society for all.

Created on 26 Feb. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.