Enhancing Large Language Models for Clinical Decision Support by Incorporating Clinical Practice Guidelines

AI-generated keywords: Clinical Decision Support Large Language Models Clinical Practice Guidelines Integration COVID-19 Outpatient Treatment

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Study explores integration of Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) into Large Language Models (LLMs) to enhance Clinical Decision Support (CDS)
  • Three novel methods introduced for incorporating CPGs into LLMs: Binary Decision Tree (BDT), Program-Aided Graph Construction (PAGC), and Chain-of-Thought-Few-Shot Prompting (CoT-FSP)
  • Research evaluates responses of four LLMs—GPT-4, GPT-3.5 Turbo, LLaMA, and PaLM 2—augmented with CPGs compared to Zero-Shot Prompting (ZSP) baseline
  • BDT method outperforms CoT-FSP and PAGC in automatic evaluation metrics
  • All proposed methods demonstrate high performance levels in enhancing recommendations for COVID-19 outpatient treatment
  • Enriching LLMs with CPGs improves accuracy in providing treatment recommendations compared to plain LLMs with ZSP
  • Study contributes valuable insights on effective integration of CPGs into LLMs for enhancing CDS capabilities
  • Developed methods hold promise for improving decision-making processes in clinical settings and advancing AI technologies for healthcare applications
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: David Oniani, Xizhi Wu, Shyam Visweswaran, Sumit Kapoor, Shravan Kooragayalu, Katelyn Polanska, Yanshan Wang

Abstract: Background Large Language Models (LLMs), enhanced with Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs), can significantly improve Clinical Decision Support (CDS). However, methods for incorporating CPGs into LLMs are not well studied. Methods We develop three distinct methods for incorporating CPGs into LLMs: Binary Decision Tree (BDT), Program-Aided Graph Construction (PAGC), and Chain-of-Thought-Few-Shot Prompting (CoT-FSP). To evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed methods, we create a set of synthetic patient descriptions and conduct both automatic and human evaluation of the responses generated by four LLMs: GPT-4, GPT-3.5 Turbo, LLaMA, and PaLM 2. Zero-Shot Prompting (ZSP) was used as the baseline method. We focus on CDS for COVID-19 outpatient treatment as the case study. Results All four LLMs exhibit improved performance when enhanced with CPGs compared to the baseline ZSP. BDT outperformed both CoT-FSP and PAGC in automatic evaluation. All of the proposed methods demonstrated high performance in human evaluation. Conclusion LLMs enhanced with CPGs demonstrate superior performance, as compared to plain LLMs with ZSP, in providing accurate recommendations for COVID-19 outpatient treatment, which also highlights the potential for broader applications beyond the case study.

Submitted to arXiv on 20 Jan. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2401.11120v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the study titled "Enhancing Large Language Models for Clinical Decision Support by Incorporating Clinical Practice Guidelines," authors David Oniani, Xizhi Wu, Shyam Visweswaran, Sumit Kapoor, Shravan Kooragayalu, Katelyn Polanska, and Yanshan Wang explore the integration of Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) into Large Language Models (LLMs) to improve Clinical Decision Support (CDS). The researchers introduce three novel methods for incorporating CPGs into LLMs: Binary Decision Tree (BDT), Program-Aided Graph Construction (PAGC), and Chain-of-Thought-Few-Shot Prompting (CoT-FSP). To assess the efficacy of these methods, the team generates synthetic patient descriptions and evaluates the responses generated by four LLMs—GPT-4, GPT-3.5 Turbo, LLaMA, and PaLM 2—using Zero-Shot Prompting (ZSP) as a baseline. <br> show that all four LLMs exhibit enhanced performance when augmented with CPGs compared to ZSP. In particular, BDT outperforms CoT-FSP and PAGC in automatic evaluation metrics. Furthermore, indicate that all proposed methods achieve high performance levels. The findings suggest that LLMs enriched with CPGs offer superior accuracy in providing recommendations for COVID-19 outpatient treatment compared to plain LLMs with ZSP. This research highlights the potential for broader applications beyond the specific case study of COVID-19 outpatient treatment.<br> Overall, contributes valuable insights into the effective integration of CPGs into LLMs for enhancing CDS capabilities. The developed methods show promise in improving decision-making processes in clinical settings and pave the way for further advancements in leveraging AI technologies for healthcare applications.
Created on 17 Jun. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.