RAG vs Fine-tuning: Pipelines, Tradeoffs, and a Case Study on Agriculture

AI-generated keywords: Large Language Models Retrieval-Augmented Generation Fine-Tuning Agricultural Dataset Industry-Specific Knowledge

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • The paper explores two approaches for incorporating proprietary and domain-specific data into applications of Large Language Models (LLMs): Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and Fine-Tuning.
  • RAG involves augmenting the prompt with external data, while Fine-Tuning incorporates additional knowledge directly into the model.
  • The authors propose a pipeline that combines fine-tuning and RAG techniques for multiple popular LLMs, including Llama2-13B, GPT-3.5, and GPT-4.
  • The pipeline consists of stages such as extracting information from PDFs, generating questions and answers, using them for fine-tuning, and leveraging GPT-4 to evaluate the results.
  • Metrics are introduced to assess the performance of different stages in the RAG and fine-tuning pipeline.
  • An in-depth study on an agricultural dataset demonstrates how these techniques can be applied to provide location-specific insights to farmers.
  • Results show that the proposed dataset generation pipeline effectively captures geographic-specific knowledge.
  • Using both RAG and fine-tuning together leads to increased accuracy compared to using either approach alone.
  • A specific experiment shows that the fine-tuned model leverages information from various geographies to answer specific questions more accurately.
  • The research showcases how systems built using LLMs can incorporate industry-specific knowledge across critical dimensions.
  • The findings open up possibilities for further applications of LLMs in other industrial domains where AI has not seen much penetration yet.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Aman Gupta, Anup Shirgaonkar, Angels de Luis Balaguer, Bruno Silva, Daniel Holstein, Dawei Li, Jennifer Marsman, Leonardo O. Nunes, Mahsa Rouzbahman, Morris Sharp, Nick Mecklenburg, Rafael Padilha, Ranveer Chandra, Renato Luiz de Freitas Cunha, Roberto de M. Estevão Filho, Ryan Tsang, Sara Malvar, Swati Sharma, Todd Hendry, Vijay Aski, Vijetha Vijayendran, Vinamra Benara

License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Abstract: There are two common ways in which developers are incorporating proprietary and domain-specific data when building applications of Large Language Models (LLMs): Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and Fine-Tuning. RAG augments the prompt with the external data, while fine-Tuning incorporates the additional knowledge into the model itself. However, the pros and cons of both approaches are not well understood. In this paper, we propose a pipeline for fine-tuning and RAG, and present the tradeoffs of both for multiple popular LLMs, including Llama2-13B, GPT-3.5, and GPT-4. Our pipeline consists of multiple stages, including extracting information from PDFs, generating questions and answers, using them for fine-tuning, and leveraging GPT-4 for evaluating the results. We propose metrics to assess the performance of different stages of the RAG and fine-Tuning pipeline. We conduct an in-depth study on an agricultural dataset. Agriculture as an industry has not seen much penetration of AI, and we study a potentially disruptive application - what if we could provide location-specific insights to a farmer? Our results show the effectiveness of our dataset generation pipeline in capturing geographic-specific knowledge, and the quantitative and qualitative benefits of RAG and fine-tuning. We see an accuracy increase of over 6 p.p. when fine-tuning the model and this is cumulative with RAG, which increases accuracy by 5 p.p. further. In one particular experiment, we also demonstrate that the fine-tuned model leverages information from across geographies to answer specific questions, increasing answer similarity from 47% to 72%. Overall, the results point to how systems built using LLMs can be adapted to respond and incorporate knowledge across a dimension that is critical for a specific industry, paving the way for further applications of LLMs in other industrial domains.

Submitted to arXiv on 16 Jan. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2401.08406v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In this paper, the authors explore two common approaches for incorporating proprietary and domain-specific data into applications of Large Language Models (LLMs): Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and Fine-Tuning. RAG involves augmenting the prompt with external data, while Fine-Tuning incorporates additional knowledge directly into the model. However, the advantages and disadvantages of both methods are not well understood. To address this gap, the authors propose a pipeline that combines fine-tuning and RAG techniques for multiple popular LLMs, including Llama2-13B, GPT-3.5, and GPT-4. The pipeline consists of several stages such as extracting information from PDFs, generating questions and answers, using them for fine-tuning, and leveraging GPT-4 to evaluate the results. The authors also introduce metrics to assess the performance of different stages in the RAG and fine-tuning pipeline. They conduct an in-depth study on an agricultural dataset to demonstrate how these techniques can be applied in a potentially disruptive application: providing location-specific insights to farmers. The results show that the proposed dataset generation pipeline effectively captures geographic-specific knowledge. Additionally, they highlight both quantitative and qualitative benefits of using RAG and fine-tuning together. Fine-tuning alone leads to an accuracy increase of over 6 percentage points (p.p. ), which is further enhanced by 5 p.p. when combined with RAG. Furthermore,a specific experiment demonstrates that the fine-tuned model leverages information from various geographies to answer specific questions more accurately,increasing answer similarity from 47% to 72%. Overall,this research showcases how systems built using LLMs can be adapted to incorporate industry-specific knowledge across critical dimensions.The findings pave the way for further applications of LLMs in other industrial domains where AI has not seen much penetration yet.
Created on 02 Feb. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.