TOFU: A Task of Fictitious Unlearning for LLMs

AI-generated keywords: Large language models Unlearning TOFU benchmark Sensitive information Legal and ethical concerns

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Large language models (LLMs) trained on web data can memorize and reproduce sensitive or private information, raising legal and ethical concerns.
  • The concept of unlearning is proposed as a solution to protect private data after training LLMs.
  • Uncertainty exists regarding the effectiveness of existing unlearning methods in making models behave as if they were never trained on forgotten data.
  • TOFU (Task of Fictitious Unlearning) is introduced as a benchmark to evaluate unlearning efficacy.
  • TOFU includes a dataset of 200 synthetic author profiles with a forget set that serves as the target for unlearning.
  • Baseline results from existing unlearning algorithms show ineffective unlearning.
  • Continued efforts are needed to develop approaches for effective unlearning and address legal and ethical concerns associated with LLMs trained on web data.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Pratyush Maini, Zhili Feng, Avi Schwarzschild, Zachary C. Lipton, J. Zico Kolter

https://locuslab.github.io/tofu/

Abstract: Large language models trained on massive corpora of data from the web can memorize and reproduce sensitive or private data raising both legal and ethical concerns. Unlearning, or tuning models to forget information present in their training data, provides us with a way to protect private data after training. Although several methods exist for such unlearning, it is unclear to what extent they result in models equivalent to those where the data to be forgotten was never learned in the first place. To address this challenge, we present TOFU, a Task of Fictitious Unlearning, as a benchmark aimed at helping deepen our understanding of unlearning. We offer a dataset of 200 diverse synthetic author profiles, each consisting of 20 question-answer pairs, and a subset of these profiles called the forget set that serves as the target for unlearning. We compile a suite of metrics that work together to provide a holistic picture of unlearning efficacy. Finally, we provide a set of baseline results from existing unlearning algorithms. Importantly, none of the baselines we consider show effective unlearning motivating continued efforts to develop approaches for unlearning that effectively tune models so that they truly behave as if they were never trained on the forget data at all.

Submitted to arXiv on 11 Jan. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2401.06121v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their paper titled "TOFU: A Task of Fictitious Unlearning for LLMs," authors Pratyush Maini, Zhili Feng, Avi Schwarzschild, Zachary C. Lipton, and J. Zico Kolter discuss the concerns surrounding large language models (LLMs) trained on vast amounts of web data. These models have the ability to memorize and reproduce sensitive or private information, which raises both legal and ethical issues. To address this problem, the authors propose the concept of unlearning, which involves tuning LLMs to forget specific information present in their training data. Unlearning provides a way to protect private data after training the models. However, there is uncertainty regarding the extent to which existing unlearning methods can effectively result in models that behave as if they were never trained on the forgotten data. To deepen our understanding of unlearning and evaluate its efficacy, the authors introduce TOFU as a benchmark. TOFU stands for "Task of Fictitious Unlearning" and includes a dataset consisting of 200 diverse synthetic author profiles. Each profile comprises 20 question-answer pairs. Within this dataset, there is a subset called the forget set that serves as the target for unlearning. The authors compile a suite of metrics that work together to provide a comprehensive assessment of unlearning efficacy. They also present baseline results from existing unlearning algorithms but highlight that none of these baselines demonstrate effective unlearning. The findings from this study emphasize the need for continued efforts in developing approaches for unlearning that truly tune LLMs to behave as if they were never trained on the forgotten data at all. By providing this refined benchmark and highlighting current limitations, TOFU aims to contribute towards advancements in protecting sensitive information and addressing legal and ethical concerns associated with large language models trained on web data.
Created on 15 Jan. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.