TrustLLM: Trustworthiness in Large Language Models

AI-generated keywords: Large language models

AI-generated Key Points

  • Large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT have impressive natural language processing capabilities
  • Trustworthiness of LLMs is a crucial focus area
  • TrustLLM introduces principles for trustworthy LLMs spanning eight dimensions
  • TrustLLM establishes benchmarks across six key dimensions: truthfulness, safety, fairness, robustness, privacy, and machine ethics
  • Positive correlation between trustworthiness and utility in LLMs
  • Proprietary LLMs generally outperform open-source counterparts in trustworthiness
  • Transparency is critical for trustworthiness in LLMs
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Lichao Sun, Yue Huang, Haoran Wang, Siyuan Wu, Qihui Zhang, Chujie Gao, Yixin Huang, Wenhan Lyu, Yixuan Zhang, Xiner Li, Zhengliang Liu, Yixin Liu, Yijue Wang, Zhikun Zhang, Bhavya Kailkhura, Caiming Xiong, Chao Zhang, Chaowei Xiao, Chunyuan Li, Eric Xing, Furong Huang, Hao Liu, Heng Ji, Hongyi Wang, Huan Zhang, Huaxiu Yao, Manolis Kellis, Marinka Zitnik, Meng Jiang, Mohit Bansal, James Zou, Jian Pei, Jian Liu, Jianfeng Gao, Jiawei Han, Jieyu Zhao, Jiliang Tang, Jindong Wang, John Mitchell, Kai Shu, Kaidi Xu, Kai-Wei Chang, Lifang He, Lifu Huang, Michael Backes, Neil Zhenqiang Gong, Philip S. Yu, Pin-Yu Chen, Quanquan Gu, Ran Xu, Rex Ying, Shuiwang Ji, Suman Jana, Tianlong Chen, Tianming Liu, Tianyi Zhou, Willian Wang, Xiang Li, Xiangliang Zhang, Xiao Wang, Xing Xie, Xun Chen, Xuyu Wang, Yan Liu, Yanfang Ye, Yinzhi Cao, Yue Zhao

This work is still under work and we welcome your contribution
License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Abstract: Large language models (LLMs), exemplified by ChatGPT, have gained considerable attention for their excellent natural language processing capabilities. Nonetheless, these LLMs present many challenges, particularly in the realm of trustworthiness. Therefore, ensuring the trustworthiness of LLMs emerges as an important topic. This paper introduces TrustLLM, a comprehensive study of trustworthiness in LLMs, including principles for different dimensions of trustworthiness, established benchmark, evaluation, and analysis of trustworthiness for mainstream LLMs, and discussion of open challenges and future directions. Specifically, we first propose a set of principles for trustworthy LLMs that span eight different dimensions. Based on these principles, we further establish a benchmark across six dimensions including truthfulness, safety, fairness, robustness, privacy, and machine ethics. We then present a study evaluating 16 mainstream LLMs in TrustLLM, consisting of over 30 datasets. Our findings firstly show that in general trustworthiness and utility (i.e., functional effectiveness) are positively related. Secondly, our observations reveal that proprietary LLMs generally outperform most open-source counterparts in terms of trustworthiness, raising concerns about the potential risks of widely accessible open-source LLMs. However, a few open-source LLMs come very close to proprietary ones. Thirdly, it is important to note that some LLMs may be overly calibrated towards exhibiting trustworthiness, to the extent that they compromise their utility by mistakenly treating benign prompts as harmful and consequently not responding. Finally, we emphasize the importance of ensuring transparency not only in the models themselves but also in the technologies that underpin trustworthiness. Knowing the specific trustworthy technologies that have been employed is crucial for analyzing their effectiveness.

Submitted to arXiv on 10 Jan. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2401.05561v1

, , , , Large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT have garnered significant attention for their impressive natural language processing capabilities. However, these LLMs also pose challenges, particularly in terms of trustworthiness. As a result, ensuring the trustworthiness of LLMs has become a crucial area of focus. This paper introduces TrustLLM, a comprehensive study that delves into the various dimensions of trustworthiness in LLMs. The study begins by outlining a set of principles for trustworthy LLMs that span eight different dimensions. Building upon these principles, TrustLLM establishes a benchmark across six key dimensions including truthfulness, safety, fairness, robustness, privacy, and machine ethics. The evaluation involves analyzing 16 mainstream LLMs using over 30 datasets. The findings from TrustLLM reveal several important insights. Firstly, there is a positive correlation between trustworthiness and utility (functional effectiveness) in LLMs. Additionally, proprietary LLMs generally outperform open-source counterparts in terms of trustworthiness, raising concerns about the risks associated with widely accessible open-source models. However, some open-source LLMs demonstrate comparable performance to proprietary ones. Furthermore, the study highlights instances where certain LLMs may prioritize exhibiting trustworthiness to such an extent that they compromise their utility by incorrectly flagging benign prompts as harmful and failing to respond appropriately. Transparency emerges as a critical factor not only within the models themselves but also in the underlying technologies that contribute to trustworthiness. In conclusion, TrustLLM underscores the importance of transparency and accountability in ensuring the trustworthiness of large language models. By identifying key principles and benchmarks for evaluating trustworthiness across various dimensions, this study provides valuable insights into enhancing the reliability and effectiveness of LLMs while addressing potential ethical concerns and challenges in their deployment.
Created on 10 Nov. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.