The Redshift Evolution of the $M_\bullet-M_\star$ Relation for JWST's Supermassive Black Holes at $z > 4$
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) has discovered overmassive galactic systems at redshifts greater than 4
- These systems have black hole masses (M_bullet) that are 10 to 100 times larger than expected based on local relations and the stellar mass of their host galaxies (M_star)
- A model is proposed to explain these overmassive systems by suggesting that the mass of the black hole is the primary driver behind the quenching of star formation at high redshifts
- Supermassive black holes (SMBHs) have a global impact on their host galaxies at redshifts greater than 4
- Black hole mass growth is regulated by quasars, while stellar mass growth is suppressed by it and not correlated with overall properties of the host halo
- The ratio between M_bullet and M_star determines the average star formation efficiency, with a threshold value given by a complex equation involving gas density, cooling efficiency, Eddington fraction, baryon density parameter, matter density parameter, and halo mass
- Once this threshold ratio is surpassed, a runaway process occurs bringing these initially overmassive systems closer to the local relation between black hole mass and stellar mass (M_bullet - M_star)
- This relation evolves with redshift as proportional to (1+z)^(5/2), with an overmassive factor of around 55 found at a redshift of approximately 5
- Extending observations to higher redshifts and lower masses will help test this model and enhance our understanding of early co-evolution between black holes and galaxies.
Authors: Fabio Pacucci, Abraham Loeb
Abstract: JWST has detected many overmassive galactic systems at $z > 4$, where the mass of the black hole, $M_\bullet$, is $10-100$ times larger than expected from local relations, given the host's stellar mass, $M_\star$. This Letter presents a model to describe these overmassive systems in the high-$z$ Universe. We suggest that the black hole mass is the main driver of high-$z$ star formation quenching. SMBHs globally impact their high-$z$ galaxies because their hosts are physically small, and the black holes have duty cycles close to unity at $z > 4$. In this regime, we assume that black hole mass growth is regulated by the quasar's output, while stellar mass growth is quenched by it and uncorrelated to the global properties of the host halo. We find that the ratio $M_\bullet/M_\star$ controls the average star formation efficiency: if $M_\bullet/M_\star > 8\times 10^{18} (n \Lambda/f_{edd})[(\Omega_b M_h)/(\Omega_m M_\star) - 1]$, then the galaxy is unable to form stars efficiently. Once this ratio exceeds the threshold, a runaway process brings the originally overmassive system towards the local $M_\bullet - M_\star$ relation. Furthermore, the $M_\bullet - M_\star$ relation evolves with redshift as $\propto (1+z)^{5/2}$. At $z \sim 5$, we find an overmassive factor of $\sim 55$, in excellent agreement with current JWST data and the high-$z$ relation inferred from those. Extending the black hole horizon farther in redshift and lower in mass will test this model and improve our understanding of the early co-evolution of black holes and galaxies.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.