The Dark Energy Survey: Cosmology Results With ~1500 New High-redshift Type Ia Supernovae Using The Full 5-year Dataset
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- The Dark Energy Survey (DES) Supernova Program revolutionized our understanding of the universe by discovering and classifying Type Ia supernovae (SN Ia) over a five-year period.
- The DES team used a machine learning algorithm to classify SNe based on their light curves in four photometric bands, resulting in the identification of 1635 high-quality DES SN in the redshift range $0.10<z<1.13$.
- This expanded sample size allowed for the tightest cosmological constraints ever achieved by a SN dataset, quintupling the number of high-quality SNe at $z>0.5$ compared to previous compilations.
- By combining DES supernova data with an external low-redshift sample, the team derived key cosmological parameters: $\Omega_{\rm M}=0.352\pm 0.017$ in a flat $\Lambda$CDM model using SN data alone, among other results.
- Incorporating additional data from Planck CMB observations, SDSS BAO measurements, and DES $3\times2$-point data led to refined cosmological parameters: $(\Omega_{\rm M},w)=(0.314^{+0.016}_{-0.017},-1.00^{+0.12}_{-0.13})$, showing consistency with dark energy as a cosmological constant within statistical uncertainties across various models tested in this study.
Authors: Y. Zhang, K. Herner, J. Lee, N. Jeffrey, W. G. Hartley, J. J. Mohr, J. Carretero, F. J. Castander, P. Fosalba, E. Bertin, W. J. Percival, J. Weller, J. Blazek, O. Alves, F. Andrade-Oliveira, J. Asorey, S. Avila, D. Brooks, E. Buckley-Geer, A. Carnero Rosell, T. M. Davis, P. Doel, B. Flaugher, J. García-Bellido, O. Graur, D. Gruen, K. Honscheid, D. Huterer, S. Kent, T. S. Li, P. Martini, J. Mena-Fernández, R. Miquel, A. Palmese, A. Porredon, E. Sanchez, M. Schubnell, N. Weaverdyck, R. H. Wechsler, G. Taylor, G. Giannini, The Dark Energy Survey Collaboration, T. M. C. Abbott, M. Acevedo, M. Aguena, A. Alarcon, S. Allam, A. Amon, J. Annis, P. Armstrong, D. Bacon, B. Bassett, K. Bechtol, P. H. Bernardinelli, G. M. Bernstein, S. Bocquet, D. Brout, D. L. Burke, H. Camacho, R. Camilleri, A. Campos, D. Carollo, A. Carr, R. Cawthon, C. Chang, R. Chen, A. Choi, C. Conselice, M. Costanzi, L. N. da Costa, M. Crocce, D. L. DePoy, S. Desai, H. T. Diehl, M. Dixon, S. Dodelson, C. Doux, A. Drlica-Wagner, J. Elvin-Poole, S. Everett, I. Ferrero, R. J. Foley, D. Friedel, J. Frieman, C. Frohmaier, A. Ferté, L. Galbany, M. Gatti, E. Gaztanaga, K. Glazebrook, R. A. Gruendl, G. Gutierrez, S. R. Hinton, D. L. Hollowood, D. J. James, L. Kelsey, R. Kessler, R. P. Kirshner, E. Kovacs, K. Kuehn, O. Lahav, S. Lee, G. F. Lewis, C. Lidman, H. Lin, J. L. Marshall, F. Menanteau, J. Mould, J. Muir, A. Möller, E. Neilsen, R. C. Nichol, P. Nugent, R. L. C. Ogando, M. Paterno, M. E. S. Pereira, A. Pieres, A. A. Plazas Malagón, B. Popovic, J. Prat, H. Qu, M. Raveri, M. Rodríguez-Monroy, A. K. Romer, A. Roodman, B. Rose, M. Sako, D. Sanchez Cid, D. Scolnic, I. Sevilla-Noarbe, P. Shah, J. Allyn. Smith, M. Smith, M. Soares-Santos, E. Suchyta, M. Sullivan, N. Suntzeff, B. O. Sánchez, G. Tarle, D. Thomas, C. To, M. Toy, M. A. Troxel, B. E. Tucker, D. L. Tucker, S. A. Uddin, M. Vincenzi, A. R. Walker, W. Wester, P. Wiseman, M. Yamamoto, F. Yuan, B. Zhang
Abstract: We present cosmological constraints from the sample of Type Ia supernovae (SN Ia) discovered during the full five years of the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Supernova Program. In contrast to most previous cosmological samples, in which SN are classified based on their spectra, we classify the DES SNe using a machine learning algorithm applied to their light curves in four photometric bands. Spectroscopic redshifts are acquired from a dedicated follow-up survey of the host galaxies. After accounting for the likelihood of each SN being a SN Ia, we find 1635 DES SN in the redshift range $0.10<z<1.13$ that pass quality selection criteria and can be used to constrain cosmological parameters. This quintuples the number of high-quality $z>0.5$ SNe compared to the previous leading compilation of Pantheon+, and results in the tightest cosmological constraints achieved by any SN data set to date. To derive cosmological constraints we combine the DES supernova data with a high-quality external low-redshift sample consisting of 194 SNe Ia spanning $0.025<z<0.10$. Using SN data alone and including systematic uncertainties we find $\Omega_{\rm M}=0.352\pm 0.017$ in a flat $\Lambda$CDM model, and $(\Omega_{\rm M},w)=(0.264^{+0.074}_{-0.096},-0.80^{+0.14}_{-0.16})$ in a flat $w$CDM model. For a flat $w_0w_a$CDM model, we find $(\Omega_{\rm M},w_0,w_a)=(0.495^{+0.033}_{-0.043},-0.36^{+0.36}_{-0.30},-8.8^{+3.7}_{-4.5})$, consistent with a constant equation of state to within $\sim2 \sigma$. Including Planck CMB data, SDSS BAO data, and DES $3\times2$-point data gives $(\Omega_{\rm M},w)=(0.321\pm0.007,-0.941\pm0.026)$. In all cases dark energy is consistent with a cosmological constant to within $\sim2\sigma$. In our analysis, systematic errors on cosmological parameters are subdominant compared to statistical errors; these results thus pave the way for future photometrically classified supernova analyses.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.