Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2312.12148v1

, , , , In this paper, the authors delve into the realm of Pretrained Language Models (PLMs) and their fine-tuning through Parameter Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) methods in Natural Language Processing (NLP). The exponential growth in the number of parameters in transformer-based PLMs, especially with the emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs), has led to a surge in successful NLP tasks. However, the sheer size and computational demands of these models present challenges when adapting them to specific downstream tasks, particularly in resource-constrained environments. PEFT offers a solution by reducing the number of fine-tuning parameters and memory usage while maintaining performance comparable to full fine-tuning. The demand for fine-tuning PLMs, especially LLMs, has resulted in an increase in the development of PEFT methods as depicted in Fig. 1. This paper provides a comprehensive review and systematic analysis of various PEFT methods for PLMs. The authors summarize these methods, discuss their applications, and outline future directions in Section III. Furthermore, they categorize PEFT methods into additive fine-tuning, partial fine-tuning, reparameterized fine-tuning, hybrid fine-tuning, and unified fine-tuning to establish a structured framework for understanding these approaches as shown in Fig. 2. In Section IV, quantitative investigations and analyses are conducted using several representative PEFT methods to better understand their effectiveness in parameter efficiency and memory efficiency. By offering insights into the latest advancements and practical applications of PEFT methods for PLMs in NLP tasks, this survey serves as a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners navigating the challenges and opportunities presented by PEFT. This study aims to provide a detailed exploration of PEFT methods for PLMs while also highlighting their significance in addressing computational resource constraints and enhancing performance on downstream tasks.

• - Pretrained Language Models (PLMs) and their fine-tuning through Parameter Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) methods are discussed in the paper.
• - PEFT reduces the number of fine-tuning parameters and memory usage while maintaining performance comparable to full fine-tuning, addressing challenges in resource-constrained environments.
• - The development of PEFT methods has increased due to the demand for fine-tuning PLMs, especially Large Language Models (LLMs).
• - Various PEFT methods are categorized into additive fine-tuning, partial fine-tuning, reparameterized fine-tuning, hybrid fine-tuning, and unified fine-tuning to establish a structured framework for understanding these approaches.
• - The paper provides quantitative investigations and analyses of representative PEFT methods to understand their effectiveness in parameter efficiency and memory efficiency.

Summary- The paper talks about using Pretrained Language Models (PLMs) and a method called Parameter Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) to make them better. - PEFT helps to use less memory and fewer settings while still keeping the PLM working well, which is helpful when resources are limited. - More PEFT methods are being made because people want to improve PLMs, especially Large Language Models (LLMs). - Different types of PEFT methods like additive fine-tuning, partial fine-tuning, and others are grouped together to help understand them better. - The paper looks at different PEFT methods closely to see how good they are at saving settings and memory. Definitions- Pretrained Language Models (PLMs): Ready-made models that can be improved for specific tasks. - Parameter Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT): A method that makes it easier to adjust PLMs without using too many resources. - Large Language Models (LLMs): Very big language models used for complex tasks.

Introduction

Natural Language Processing (NLP) is a rapidly growing field that focuses on developing algorithms and models to understand, analyze, and generate human language. In recent years, Pretrained Language Models (PLMs) have emerged as the dominant approach in NLP tasks due to their ability to learn from large amounts of text data and achieve state-of-the-art performance. However, the increasing size and complexity of these models have also posed challenges in terms of computational resources and memory usage. To address these issues, Parameter Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) methods have been developed for PLMs. These methods aim to reduce the number of fine-tuning parameters while maintaining or even improving performance on downstream tasks. This paper provides a detailed analysis of various PEFT methods for PLMs, categorizing them into different types and evaluating their effectiveness through quantitative investigations.

Background: Pretrained Language Models

Pretrained Language Models are neural network-based models trained on large amounts of unlabeled text data using unsupervised learning techniques such as self-supervision or autoencoding. These models can then be fine-tuned on specific downstream tasks with labeled data to adapt them for specific purposes. The most well-known PLM is BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers), which has 340 million parameters. Since its release in 2018, there has been an exponential growth in the number of parameters in transformer-based PLMs with GPT-3 (Generative Pre-trained Transformer-3) having a whopping 175 billion parameters.

The Need for Parameter Efficient Fine-Tuning

While LLMs have shown impressive results on various NLP tasks, they also come with significant computational demands. The training process for these models requires massive amounts of computing power and time, making it challenging to use them in resource-constrained environments such as mobile devices or low-power devices. Moreover, fine-tuning these models on specific downstream tasks also requires a significant amount of memory and computational resources. This has led to the development of PEFT methods that aim to reduce the number of parameters and memory usage while maintaining or improving performance on downstream tasks.

Categorization of PEFT Methods

The authors categorize PEFT methods into five types: additive fine-tuning, partial fine-tuning, reparameterized fine-tuning, hybrid fine-tuning, and unified fine-tuning. These categories are based on the different approaches used by each method to achieve parameter efficiency. 1. Additive Fine-Tuning: In this approach, additional layers or modules are added to the pretrained model during fine-tuning. These layers can be task-specific or general-purpose and are trained along with the original model's parameters. 2. Partial Fine-Tuning: This method involves freezing some of the pretrained model's layers during fine-tuning while only updating a subset of its parameters. 3. Reparameterized Fine-Tuning: Here, instead of using all the pretrained model's parameters for fine-tuning, a smaller set is selected through various techniques such as pruning or knowledge distillation. 4. Hybrid Fine-Tuning: As the name suggests, this approach combines multiple strategies from other types to achieve parameter efficiency. 5. Unified Fine-Tuning: In this type, a single unified network is trained for both pretraining and downstream tasks simultaneously.

Quantitative Analysis

To evaluate the effectiveness of various PEFT methods in terms of parameter efficiency and memory usage reduction without sacrificing performance on downstream tasks, several quantitative investigations were conducted in this paper. Through experiments on different NLP datasets using representative PEFT methods such as AdapterHub (additive), LayerDrop (partial), TinyBERT (reparameterized), DistilBERT (hybrid), and UnifiedQA (unified), the authors found that these methods can achieve significant parameter efficiency and memory savings while maintaining or even improving performance compared to full fine-tuning.

Applications and Future Directions

The paper also discusses the practical applications of PEFT methods in various NLP tasks such as text classification, question-answering, and language generation. These methods have shown promising results in reducing computational demands and enhancing performance on downstream tasks, making them valuable tools for researchers and practitioners. Furthermore, the authors highlight some potential future directions for PEFT research, including exploring new techniques for reparameterization or hybrid approaches, investigating the impact of different types of pretrained models on PEFT methods' effectiveness, and developing more efficient unified fine-tuning strategies.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this paper provides a comprehensive review and analysis of Parameter Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) methods for Pretrained Language Models (PLMs) in Natural Language Processing (NLP). By categorizing these methods into different types and conducting quantitative investigations to evaluate their effectiveness, this study serves as a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners navigating the challenges posed by large PLMs' computational demands. Furthermore, it highlights the significance of PEFT in addressing resource constraints while maintaining or improving performance on downstream tasks. With its insights into current advancements and potential future directions in this field, this survey contributes to further developments in efficient use of PLMs in NLP tasks.