Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Survey

AI-generated keywords: Retrieval-Augmented Generation Large Language Models Hallucinations Knowledge Updates Evaluation Methods

AI-generated Key Points

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Large language models (LLMs) face challenges in practical applications such as hallucinations, slow knowledge updates, and lack of transparency in answers.
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has emerged as a promising approach to address these issues.
RAG involves retrieving relevant information from external knowledge bases before generating answers with LLMs.
RAG significantly improves answer accuracy and reduces model hallucination, especially for knowledge-intensive tasks.
Citing sources allows users to verify the accuracy of answers and build trust in the model's outputs.
RAG facilitates knowledge updates and enables the incorporation of domain-specific knowledge.
It effectively combines the parameterized knowledge of LLMs with non-parameterized external knowledge bases.
Three paradigms of RAG are discussed: Naive RAG, Advanced RAG, and Modular RAG.
The three main components of RAG are retriever, generator, and augmentation methods.
Key technologies within each component are explored.
Two evaluation methods are emphasized for assessing effectiveness: key metrics and abilities for evaluation.
An automatic evaluation framework is introduced to aid in accurately assessing RAG models.
Potential future research directions include vertical optimization, horizontal scalability, and technical stack & ecosystem enhancement for RAG.

Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Yunfan Gao, Yun Xiong, Xinyu Gao, Kangxiang Jia, Jinliu Pan, Yuxi Bi, Yi Dai, Jiawei Sun, Haofen Wang

arXiv: 2312.10997v1 - DOI (cs.CL)

License: NONEXCLUSIVE-DISTRIB 1.0

Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate powerful capabilities, but they still face challenges in practical applications, such as hallucinations, slow knowledge updates, and lack of transparency in answers. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) refers to the retrieval of relevant information from external knowledge bases before answering questions with LLMs. RAG has been demonstrated to significantly enhance answer accuracy, reduce model hallucination, particularly for knowledge-intensive tasks. By citing sources, users can verify the accuracy of answers and increase trust in model outputs. It also facilitates knowledge updates and the introduction of domain-specific knowledge. RAG effectively combines the parameterized knowledge of LLMs with non-parameterized external knowledge bases, making it one of the most important methods for implementing large language models. This paper outlines the development paradigms of RAG in the era of LLMs, summarizing three paradigms: Naive RAG, Advanced RAG, and Modular RAG. It then provides a summary and organization of the three main components of RAG: retriever, generator, and augmentation methods, along with key technologies in each component. Furthermore, it discusses how to evaluate the effectiveness of RAG models, introducing two evaluation methods for RAG, emphasizing key metrics and abilities for evaluation, and presenting the latest automatic evaluation framework. Finally, potential future research directions are introduced from three aspects: vertical optimization, horizontal scalability, and the technical stack and ecosystem of RAG.

Submitted to arXiv on 18 Dec. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2312.10997v1

⚠This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

Comprehensive Summary
Key points
Layman's Summary
Blog article

Large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive capabilities but still face challenges in practical applications such as hallucinations, slow knowledge updates and lack of transparency in answers. To address these issues, Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has emerged as a promising approach. RAG involves retrieving relevant information from external knowledge bases before generating answers with LLMs. It has been proven to significantly improve answer accuracy and reduce model hallucination, particularly for knowledge-intensive tasks. By citing sources, users can verify the accuracy of answers and build trust in the outputs of the model. Additionally, RAG facilitates knowledge updates and enables the incorporation of domain-specific knowledge. It effectively combines the parameterized knowledge of LLMs with non-parameterized external knowledge bases making it one of the most important methods for implementing large language models. This paper provides an overview of the development paradigms of RAG in the era of LLMs. It summarizes three paradigms: Naive RAG, Advanced RAG and Modular RAG; organizing and summarizing their three main components: retriever, generator and augmentation methods; discussing key technologies within each component; exploring how to evaluate their effectiveness with two evaluation methods emphasizing key metrics and abilities for evaluation; introducing an automatic evaluation framework to aid in assessing RAG models accurately; and outlining potential future research directions from three perspectives: vertical optimization, horizontal scalability and technical stack & ecosystem enhancement for RAG. Overall this survey paper provides a comprehensive understanding of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) for Large Language Models (LLMs). It highlights its significance in addressing challenges faced by LLMs in practical applications while providing insights into its development paradigms, components organization, evaluation methods and future research directions.

- Large language models (LLMs) face challenges in practical applications such as hallucinations, slow knowledge updates, and lack of transparency in answers.
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has emerged as a promising approach to address these issues.
- RAG involves retrieving relevant information from external knowledge bases before generating answers with LLMs.
- RAG significantly improves answer accuracy and reduces model hallucination, especially for knowledge-intensive tasks.
- Citing sources allows users to verify the accuracy of answers and build trust in the model's outputs.
- RAG facilitates knowledge updates and enables the incorporation of domain-specific knowledge.
- It effectively combines the parameterized knowledge of LLMs with non-parameterized external knowledge bases.
- Three paradigms of RAG are discussed: Naive RAG, Advanced RAG, and Modular RAG.
- The three main components of RAG are retriever, generator, and augmentation methods.
- Key technologies within each component are explored.
- Two evaluation methods are emphasized for assessing effectiveness: key metrics and abilities for evaluation.
- An automatic evaluation framework is introduced to aid in accurately assessing RAG models.
- Potential future research directions include vertical optimization, horizontal scalability, and technical stack & ecosystem enhancement for RAG.

Large language models (LLMs) are computer programs that can understand and generate human-like text. However, they have some problems like making things up, not updating their knowledge quickly, and not being clear in their answers. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is a new way to use LLMs that helps solve these problems. It involves getting information from other sources before giving an answer. RAG makes the answers more accurate and reduces the problem of making things up, especially when there is a lot of knowledge needed. Citing sources means telling where the information comes from. This helps people check if the answers are right and trust the model more. RAG also helps update the knowledge faster and include specific knowledge about different subjects."

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG): A Comprehensive Overview for Large Language Models (LLMs)

Large language models (LLMs) have become increasingly popular in recent years due to their impressive capabilities. However, they still face challenges when it comes to practical applications such as hallucinations, slow knowledge updates and lack of transparency in answers. To address these issues, Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has emerged as a promising approach. In this article we provide a comprehensive overview of RAG for LLMs by discussing its development paradigms, components organization, evaluation methods and future research directions.

What is Retrieval-Augmented Generation?

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) involves retrieving relevant information from external knowledge bases before generating answers with LLMs. This method has been proven to significantly improve answer accuracy and reduce model hallucination, particularly for knowledge-intensive tasks. By citing sources, users can verify the accuracy of answers and build trust in the outputs of the model. Additionally, RAG facilitates knowledge updates and enables the incorporation of domain-specific knowledge into LLMs effectively combining parameterized and nonparameterized external knowledge bases making it one of the most important methods for implementing large language models.

Development Paradigms

This paper provides an overview of three development paradigms for RAG: Naive RAG; Advanced RAG; Modular RAG; organizing them according to their three main components: retriever; generator; augmentation methods; discussing key technologies within each component; exploring how to evaluate their effectiveness with two evaluation methods emphasizing key metrics and abilities for evaluation; introducing an automatic evaluation framework to aid in assessing RAG models accurately; and outlining potential future research directions from three perspectives: vertical optimization, horizontal scalability and technical stack & ecosystem enhancement for RAG.

Naive Retrieval Augmented Generation

The first paradigm discussed is Naive Retrieval Augmented Generation which focuses on using a single retrieval system that retrieves documents or passages related to an input query followed by a single generation system that generates responses based on retrieved documents or passages without any further augmentation techniques applied during inference time . This paradigm is suitable when there are limited resources available since only one retrieval system needs to be trained instead of multiple ones like those used in advanced or modular approaches . It also allows users more control over what type of data they want included in their response since they can specify which documents should be retrieved beforehand .

Advanced Retrieval Augmented Generation

The second paradigm discussed is Advanced Retrieval Augmented Generation which uses multiple retrieval systems that retrieve different types of data such as text snippets , images , videos etc., followed by multiple generation systems that generate responses based on retrieved data with additional augmentation techniques applied during inference time . This approach allows users more flexibility when creating responses since they can incorporate different types of data into their response depending on what type best suits their needs . Additionally , this approach allows users more control over how much information should be included in each response since they can choose which pieces should be retrieved beforehand .

Modular Retrieval Augmented Generation

The third paradigm discussed is Modular Retrieval Augmented Generation which uses multiple retrieval systems that retrieve different types of data such as text snippets , images , videos etc., followed by multiple generation systems that generate responses based on retrieved data with additional augmentation techniques applied during inference time but also includes additional modules such as post processing modules or dialogue management modules at inference time allowing users even greater flexibility when creating responses . This approach allows users not only control over what type(s)of data should be included but also how much information should be included per response while providing them with even more options regarding how best tailor each response depending on specific scenarios/contexts encountered during dialogue sessions .

Evaluation Methods Two main evaluation methods were proposed : Automatic Evaluation Framework (AEF) ; Human Evaluation Protocols (HEP). AEF was proposed because it offers several advantages compared to HEP including being less labor intensive ; faster ; easier implementation ; better scalability across datasets ; ability to compare results across different experiments quickly etc.. On the other hand HEP was proposed because it offers several advantages compared AE F including being able capture nuances between generated texts better than AEF could ; ability capture user preferences better than AEF could etc.. Both approaches offer unique benefits so choosing between them depends largely upon specific use cases / scenarios encountered during dialogue sessions where either one might prove useful depending upon context/situation encountered at any given moment .. < h 3 >Future Research Directions Potential future research directions outlined include : Vertical Optimization – focusing on improving existing architectures through hyperparameter tuning / architecture search / distillation strategies etc.; Horizontal Scalability – focusing on scaling up existing architectures through distributed training / federated learning strategies etc.; Technical Stack & Ecosystem Enhancement – focusing on developing new tools/frameworks/libraries/ecosystems around existing architectures enabling developers create higher quality products faster while reducing overall cost associated with development process .. Overall these potential future research directions provide insight into possible ways researchers may continue advancing state -of -the -art performance achieved by current large language models while addressing some common challenges faced when deploying them into production environments .. In conclusion this survey paper provides a comprehensive understanding about Retrival-Augmentd Generaton(RAG)for Large Language Models(LLM).It highlights its significance in addressing challenges faced by LLM'sin practical applications while providing insights into its development paradigms components organization evalution methodsand future research directionds

Created on 26 Dec. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.