Time Delay Cosmography: Analysis of Quadruply Lensed QSO SDSSJ1433 from Wendelstein Observatory

AI-generated keywords: Hubble constant estimate Quadruply lensed QSO Time Delay Cosmography Gravitational lensing systems High cadence observational campaigns

AI-generated Key Points

  • Primary objective: Derive Hubble constant estimate using quadruply lensed, variable QSO SDSSJ1433+6007
  • Methodology:
  • Combine multi-filter, archival $\textit{HST}$ data for lens modeling
  • Conduct dedicated time delay monitoring campaign at the 2.1m Fraunhofer telescope at the $\textit{Wendelstein Observatory}$
  • Discovery of light contaminant in F160W filter that could bias lensing potentials and cosmological inferences if unaddressed
  • Precise posterior estimates for Fermat potential differences obtained from lens modeling in remaining filters (F475X, F814W, F105W, F140W) with approximately 6% precision
  • Analysis of Wendelstein light curve data using free-knot spline fitting method in Python tools to determine time delays between QSO images (7.5% to 9.8% range)
  • Derived Hubble parameter estimate of $H_0=76.6^{+7.7}_{-7.0}\frac{\mathrm{km}}{\mathrm{Mpc\;s}}$ with uncertainty as low as 9.6%
  • Comparison with study by Schmidt et al. (2022) showing tensions in certain parameters due to differences in modeling approach and contaminants present in specific filters
  • Contribution to addressing Hubble tension through independent verification via Time Delay Cosmography (TDC) for QSOs like SDSSJ1433+6007
  • Emphasis on importance of 2-meter ground-based telescopes for high cadence observational campaigns essential for following up on strong lenses identified through large-scale surveys
  • Significance of meticulous data analysis and observation techniques in deriving accurate cosmological parameters such as the Hubble constant within acceptable uncertainties
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: G. Queirolo (Universitäts-Sternwarte, Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München, Scheinerstr. 1, 81679 München, Germany), S. Seitz (Universitäts-Sternwarte, Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München, Scheinerstr. 1, 81679 München, Germany), A. Riffeser (Universitäts-Sternwarte, Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München, Scheinerstr. 1, 81679 München, Germany), M. Kluge (Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, Giessenbachstrasse 1, 85748 Garching, Germany), R. Bender (Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, Giessenbachstrasse 1, 85748 Garching, Germany), C. Gössl (Universitäts-Sternwarte, Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München, Scheinerstr. 1, 81679 München, Germany), U. Hopp (Universitäts-Sternwarte, Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München, Scheinerstr. 1, 81679 München, Germany), C. Ries (Universitäts-Sternwarte, Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München, Scheinerstr. 1, 81679 München, Germany), M. Schmidt (Universitäts-Sternwarte, Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München, Scheinerstr. 1, 81679 München, Germany), R. Zöller (Universitäts-Sternwarte, Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München, Scheinerstr. 1, 81679 München, Germany)

arXiv: 2312.09311v1 - DOI (astro-ph.CO)
27 pages, 29 figures, to be submitted to MNRAS
License: CC BY-SA 4.0

Abstract: The goal of this work is to obtain a Hubble constant estimate through the study of the quadruply lensed, variable QSO SDSSJ1433+6007. To achieve this we combine multi-filter, archival $\textit{HST}$ data for lens modelling and a dedicated time delay monitoring campaign with the 2.1m Fraunhofer telescope at the $\textit{Wendelstein Observatory}$. The lens modelling is carried out with the public $\texttt{lenstronomy}$ Python package for each of the filters individually. Through this approach, we find that the data in one of the $\textit{HST}$ filters (F160W) contain a light contaminant, that would, if remained undetected, have severely biased the lensing potentials and thus our cosmological inference. After rejecting these data we obtain a combined posterior for the Fermat potential differences from the lens modelling in the remaining filters (F475X, F814W, F105W and F140W) with a precision of $\sim6\%$. The analysis of the $\textit{g'}$-band Wendelstein light curve data is carried out with a free-knot spline fitting method implemented in the public Python $\texttt{PyCS3}$ tools. The precision of the time delays between the QSO images has a range between 7.5 and 9.8$\%$ depending on the brightness of the images and their time delay. We then combine the posteriors for the Fermat potential differences and time delays. Assuming a flat $\Lambda$CDM cosmology, we infer a Hubble parameter of $H_0=76.6^{+7.7}_{-7.0}\frac{\mathrm{km}}{\mathrm{Mpc\;s}}$, reaching $9.6\%$ uncertainty for a single system.

Submitted to arXiv on 14 Dec. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2312.09311v1

In this work, the primary objective was to derive a Hubble constant estimate utilizing the quadruply lensed, variable QSO SDSSJ1433+6007. The methodology involved combining multi-filter, archival $\textit{HST}$ data for lens modeling with a dedicated time delay monitoring campaign conducted at the 2.1m Fraunhofer telescope at the $\textit{Wendelstein Observatory}$. Notably, it was discovered that one of the $\textit{HST}$ filters (F160W) contained a light contaminant that could have significantly biased the lensing potentials and subsequent cosmological inferences if left unaddressed. After excluding these problematic data points, precise posterior estimates for the Fermat potential differences were obtained from lens modeling in the remaining filters (F475X, F814W, F105W, and F140W), achieving an impressive precision of approximately $6\%$. Furthermore, analysis of the $\textit{g'}$-band Wendelstein light curve data was carried out using a free-knot spline fitting method implemented in Python tools. The resulting time delays between the QSO images exhibited a range of 7.5% to 9.8% depending on image brightness and time delay duration. By combining the posteriors for Fermat potential differences and time delays under assumptions of a flat $\Lambda$CDM cosmology, a Hubble parameter estimate of $H_0=76.6^{+7.7}_{-7.0}\frac{\mathrm{km}}{\mathrm{Mpc\;s}}$ was derived with an uncertainty as low as $9.6\%$ for this single system. Moreover, comparisons were made with a study by Schmidt et al. (2022) that utilized similar HST data but differed in modeling approach and scope. Tensions were observed in certain parameters between their analysis and this study due to differences in axis ratio estimations potentially influenced by contaminants present in specific filters. Additionally, this research contributes to addressing the Hubble tension by providing an independent verification through implementing Time Delay Cosmography (TDC) for QSOs like SDSSJ1433+6007. Furthermore, it highlights the importance of 2-meter ground-based telescopes for conducting high cadence observational campaigns essential for following up on strong lenses identified through large-scale surveys expected to increase significantly in number with upcoming astrophysical projects. Overall, this study not only refines our understanding of gravitational lensing systems like SDSSJ1433+6007 but also underscores the significance of meticulous data analysis and observation techniques in deriving accurate cosmological parameters such as the Hubble constant within acceptable uncertainties.
Created on 26 Mar. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.