Beyond English: Evaluating LLMs for Arabic Grammatical Error Correction
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Study evaluates performance of instruction finetuned large language models (LLMs) in Arabic grammatical error correction (GEC)
- LLMs have shown promising results in English natural language processing tasks, but effectiveness for other languages not extensively explored
- Arabic's rich morphology makes GEC challenging
- Researchers employ different prompting methods and utilize few-shot learning to enhance model's performance
- GPT-4 achieves F1 score of up to 65.49 under expert prompting, 5 points higher than established baseline
- Smaller fully finetuned models outperform instruction finetuned ones, indicating room for improvement in LLMs
- Researchers develop method using synthetic data inspired by low-resource machine translation techniques
- Method surpasses previous models' performance on two standard Arabic benchmarks
- Best model achieves new state-of-the-art result with F1 scores of 73.29 and 73.26 on 2014 and 2015 QALB datasets respectively compared to peer-reviewed published baselines
- Research highlights potential and limitations of instruction finetuned LLMs in Arabic GEC
- Introduces novel approach that improves upon existing methods for this task
Authors: Sang Yun Kwon, Gagan Bhatia, El Moatez Billah Nagoudi, Muhammad Abdul-Mageed
Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) finetuned to follow human instruction have recently exhibited significant capabilities in various English NLP tasks. However, their performance in grammatical error correction (GEC), especially on languages other than English, remains significantly unexplored. In this work, we evaluate the abilities of instruction finetuned LLMs in Arabic GEC, a complex task due to Arabic's rich morphology. Our findings suggest that various prompting methods, coupled with (in-context) few-shot learning, demonstrate considerable effectiveness, with GPT-4 achieving up to $65.49$ F$_{1}$ score under expert prompting (approximately $5$ points higher than our established baseline). Despite these positive results, we find that instruction finetuned models, regardless of their size, are still outperformed by fully finetuned ones, even if they are significantly smaller in size. This disparity highlights substantial room for improvements for LLMs. Inspired by methods used in low-resource machine translation, we also develop a method exploiting synthetic data that significantly outperforms previous models on two standard Arabic benchmarks. Our best model achieves a new SOTA on Arabic GEC, with $73.29$ and $73.26$ F$_{1}$ on the 2014 and 2015 QALB datasets, respectively, compared to peer-reviewed published baselines.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.