Beyond English: Evaluating LLMs for Arabic Grammatical Error Correction

AI-generated keywords: Arabic GEC LLMs Finetuning Few-shot Learning Synthetic Data

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Study evaluates performance of instruction finetuned large language models (LLMs) in Arabic grammatical error correction (GEC)
  • LLMs have shown promising results in English natural language processing tasks, but effectiveness for other languages not extensively explored
  • Arabic's rich morphology makes GEC challenging
  • Researchers employ different prompting methods and utilize few-shot learning to enhance model's performance
  • GPT-4 achieves F1 score of up to 65.49 under expert prompting, 5 points higher than established baseline
  • Smaller fully finetuned models outperform instruction finetuned ones, indicating room for improvement in LLMs
  • Researchers develop method using synthetic data inspired by low-resource machine translation techniques
  • Method surpasses previous models' performance on two standard Arabic benchmarks
  • Best model achieves new state-of-the-art result with F1 scores of 73.29 and 73.26 on 2014 and 2015 QALB datasets respectively compared to peer-reviewed published baselines
  • Research highlights potential and limitations of instruction finetuned LLMs in Arabic GEC
  • Introduces novel approach that improves upon existing methods for this task
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Sang Yun Kwon, Gagan Bhatia, El Moatez Billah Nagoudi, Muhammad Abdul-Mageed

arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2308.04492

Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) finetuned to follow human instruction have recently exhibited significant capabilities in various English NLP tasks. However, their performance in grammatical error correction (GEC), especially on languages other than English, remains significantly unexplored. In this work, we evaluate the abilities of instruction finetuned LLMs in Arabic GEC, a complex task due to Arabic's rich morphology. Our findings suggest that various prompting methods, coupled with (in-context) few-shot learning, demonstrate considerable effectiveness, with GPT-4 achieving up to $65.49$ F$_{1}$ score under expert prompting (approximately $5$ points higher than our established baseline). Despite these positive results, we find that instruction finetuned models, regardless of their size, are still outperformed by fully finetuned ones, even if they are significantly smaller in size. This disparity highlights substantial room for improvements for LLMs. Inspired by methods used in low-resource machine translation, we also develop a method exploiting synthetic data that significantly outperforms previous models on two standard Arabic benchmarks. Our best model achieves a new SOTA on Arabic GEC, with $73.29$ and $73.26$ F$_{1}$ on the 2014 and 2015 QALB datasets, respectively, compared to peer-reviewed published baselines.

Submitted to arXiv on 13 Dec. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2312.08400v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

This study evaluates the performance of instruction finetuned large language models (LLMs) in Arabic grammatical error correction (GEC). While LLMs have shown promising results in English natural language processing tasks, their effectiveness for other languages has not been extensively explored. Arabic's rich morphology makes it a challenging task. The researchers employ different prompting methods and utilize few-shot learning to enhance the model's performance. They find that GPT-4 achieves an F1 score of up to 65.49 under expert prompting, which is approximately 5 points higher than the established baseline. However, they observe that even smaller fully finetuned models outperform instruction finetuned ones, indicating room for improvement in LLMs. Inspired by low-resource machine translation techniques, the researchers develop a method using synthetic data which surpasses previous models' performance on two standard Arabic benchmarks. Their best model achieves a new state-of-the-art result with F1 scores of 73.29 and 73.26 on the 2014 and 2015 QALB datasets respectively compared to peer-reviewed published baselines. This research highlights both the potential and limitations of instruction finetuned LLMs in Arabic GEC and introduces a novel approach that improves upon existing methods for this task.
Created on 26 Dec. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.