"Centralized or Decentralized?": Concerns and Value Judgments of Stakeholders in the Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) Market

AI-generated keywords: Non-fungible tokens (NFTs) Centralization-Decentralization Dilemma Stakeholder Interviews Thematic Analysis Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA)

AI-generated Key Points

  • Non-fungible tokens (NFTs) represent unique ownership of digital items
  • Popularity of NFTs has led to issues such as scams, racism, and sexism
  • Centralization-decentralization dilemma is inherent in NFTs
  • Analysis of over 30,000 NFT-related tweets was conducted
  • Top words and bigrams were analyzed to understand trending topics in the NFT space
  • Opinion leaders within the NFT community were identified
  • Thematic analysis and topic modeling were performed on tweets from opinion leaders and ordinary users
  • Concerning issues include financial scams, counterfeit NFTs, and hacking unethical NFTs
  • Stakeholder interviews provided insights into potential solutions for the centralization-decentralization dilemma
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Yunpeng Xiao, Bufan Deng, Siqi Chen, Kyrie Zhixuan Zhou, Ray LC, Luyao Zhang, Xin Tong

Accepted by CSCW 2024
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Non-fungible tokens (NFTs) are decentralized digital tokens to represent the unique ownership of items. Recently, NFTs have been gaining popularity and at the same time bringing up issues, such as scams, racism, and sexism. Decentralization, a key attribute of NFT, contributes to some of the issues that are easier to regulate under centralized schemes, which are intentionally left out of the NFT marketplace. In this work, we delved into this centralization-decentralization dilemma in the NFT space through mixed quantitative and qualitative methods. Centralization-decentralization dilemma is the dilemma caused by the conflict between the slogan of decentralization and the interests of stakeholders. We first analyzed over 30,000 NFT-related tweets to obtain a high-level understanding of stakeholders' concerns in the NFT space. We then interviewed 15 NFT stakeholders (both creators and collectors) to obtain their in-depth insights into these concerns and potential solutions. Our findings identify concerning issues among users: financial scams, counterfeit NFTs, hacking, and unethical NFTs. We further reflected on the centralization-decentralization dilemma drawing upon the perspectives of the stakeholders in the interviews. Finally, we gave some inferences to solve the centralization-decentralization dilemma in the NFT market and thought about the future of NFT and decentralization.

Submitted to arXiv on 18 Nov. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2311.10990v2

Non-fungible tokens (NFTs) have gained significant popularity as decentralized digital tokens representing unique ownership of items. However, this rise in popularity has also brought forth various issues such as scams, racism, and sexism within the NFT marketplace. These issues are a result of the centralization-decentralization dilemma inherent in NFTs. While decentralization is a key attribute of NFTs, it also contributes to challenges that are easier to regulate under centralized schemes. To delve into this centralization-decentralization dilemma in the NFT space, a mixed quantitative and qualitative approach was taken. Over 30,000 NFT-related tweets were analyzed to understand stakeholders' concerns in the NFT market. The tweets were pre-processed by removing hashtags, mentions, punctuations, URLs, and abbreviations. Emojis were transformed into text and contractions were replaced with their full forms. The analysis revealed top words according to occurrence frequency, providing a general understanding of trending topics in the NFT space. Additionally, bigrams (pairs of co-occurring words) were plotted to detect lexical trends and understand connections and differences between keywords. Opinion leaders within the NFT community were identified as influential users whose opinions and ideas hold significant sway on social networks. Parameters such as the number of times an account is mentioned, followers count, retweets received, and mentions were used to identify these opinion leaders. A network was created based on this subset of opinion leaders using Gephi for visualization. Thematic analysis was conducted on randomly sampled tweets from both opinion leaders (KOLs) and ordinary accounts to compare their perceptions and concerns regarding NFTs. Furthermore, topic modeling using Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) was performed on corpus extracted from tweets of KOLs and ordinary users. LDA helped extract common themes from large datasets by structuring data into word-topic-document levels. This facilitated the identification of 15 topics for KOLs and 25 topics for ordinary users allowing for a comparison of similarities and differences in perceptions and concerns related to non-fungible tokens (NFT). Overall, the analysis highlighted concerning issues among NFT users such as financial scams, counterfeit NFTs hacking unethical NFTs which are all results stemming from the centralization-decentralization dilemma present in non fungible token marketspaces . To further explore this dilemma stakeholder interviews provided insights into potential solutions that could be implemented going forward . In conclusion this research provides valuable insights into the centralization - decentralization dilemma in the non fungible token market , identifies key concerns among stakeholders , offers suggestions to address these challenges , while also understanding perspectives from both opinion leaders & ordinary users contributing towards shaping future regulations & ethical standards surrounding non fungible tokens & decentralisation .
Created on 19 Dec. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.