How ChatGPT is Solving Vulnerability Management Problem

AI-generated keywords: ChatGPT Vulnerability Management Code Analysis AI Models Prompts

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Significant interest in the code analysis domain regarding ChatGPT
  • Previous studies demonstrate ChatGPT's capability in foundational code analysis tasks
  • Evaluation of ChatGPT's performance in vulnerability management tasks using a large-scale dataset
  • Promising potential for leveraging ChatGPT in vulnerability management, particularly in generating titles for software bug reports
  • Difficulties faced by ChatGPT and areas for future research identified
  • Challenges with providing random demonstration examples and guiding ChatGPT to focus on relevant information
  • Study expands understanding of how ChatGPT can contribute to vulnerability management and provides insights for future research directions.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Peiyu Liu, Junming Liu, Lirong Fu, Kangjie Lu, Yifan Xia, Xuhong Zhang, Wenzhi Chen, Haiqin Weng, Shouling Ji, Wenhai Wang

Abstract: Recently, ChatGPT has attracted great attention from the code analysis domain. Prior works show that ChatGPT has the capabilities of processing foundational code analysis tasks, such as abstract syntax tree generation, which indicates the potential of using ChatGPT to comprehend code syntax and static behaviors. However, it is unclear whether ChatGPT can complete more complicated real-world vulnerability management tasks, such as the prediction of security relevance and patch correctness, which require an all-encompassing understanding of various aspects, including code syntax, program semantics, and related manual comments. In this paper, we explore ChatGPT's capabilities on 6 tasks involving the complete vulnerability management process with a large-scale dataset containing 78,445 samples. For each task, we compare ChatGPT against SOTA approaches, investigate the impact of different prompts, and explore the difficulties. The results suggest promising potential in leveraging ChatGPT to assist vulnerability management. One notable example is ChatGPT's proficiency in tasks like generating titles for software bug reports. Furthermore, our findings reveal the difficulties encountered by ChatGPT and shed light on promising future directions. For instance, directly providing random demonstration examples in the prompt cannot consistently guarantee good performance in vulnerability management. By contrast, leveraging ChatGPT in a self-heuristic way -- extracting expertise from demonstration examples itself and integrating the extracted expertise in the prompt is a promising research direction. Besides, ChatGPT may misunderstand and misuse the information in the prompt. Consequently, effectively guiding ChatGPT to focus on helpful information rather than the irrelevant content is still an open problem.

Submitted to arXiv on 11 Nov. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2311.06530v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

Recently, there has been significant interest in the code analysis domain regarding ChatGPT. Previous studies have demonstrated that ChatGPT is capable of processing foundational code analysis tasks, such as generating abstract syntax trees, indicating its potential for understanding code syntax and static behaviors. To further explore ChatGPT's capabilities in vulnerability management tasks, the authors of this paper evaluate its performance across six tasks related to the complete vulnerability management process. They utilize a large-scale dataset consisting of 78,445 samples and compare ChatGPT against state-of-the-art approaches. The results of their experiments indicate promising potential for leveraging ChatGPT to assist in vulnerability management. Notably, ChatGPT demonstrates proficiency in tasks like generating titles for software bug reports. However, the study also uncovers difficulties faced by ChatGPT and highlights areas for future research. For instance, directly providing random demonstration examples in the prompt does not consistently guarantee good performance in vulnerability management; instead a self-heuristic approach that extracts expertise from demonstration examples themselves and integrates it into the prompt shows promise. Furthermore, effectively guiding ChatGPT to focus on relevant information rather than irrelevant content remains an open problem. Overall, this study expands our understanding of how ChatGPT can contribute to vulnerability management by exploring its capabilities across multiple tasks and shedding light on both its strengths and limitations. The findings provide valuable insights for future research directions aimed at improving the performance and usability of AI models like ChatGPT in practical code analysis scenarios.
Created on 17 Nov. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.