Prompt Engineering a Prompt Engineer

AI-generated keywords: Prompt Engineering LLMs Meta-prompting PE2 Counterfactual Reasoning

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Authors address the challenge of prompt engineering for optimizing large language models (LLMs)
  • Previous works have explored meta-prompting LLMs, but lack guidance for complex reasoning capabilities
  • Authors propose "prompt engineering a prompt engineer" to construct a meta-prompt that better guides LLMs
  • Key components include step-by-step reasoning template and context specification
  • Verbalized optimization concepts are introduced into the meta-prompt
  • Final method called PE2 outperforms existing approaches on MultiArith and GSM8K datasets
  • PE2 is applied to various scenarios, achieving strong performance in different tasks
  • PE2 makes meaningful and targeted prompt edits, addressing errors and exhibiting counterfactual reasoning abilities
  • Work contributes to advancing automatic prompt engineering techniques through a refined meta-prompt approach.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Qinyuan Ye, Maxamed Axmed, Reid Pryzant, Fereshte Khani

Abstract: Prompt engineering is a challenging yet crucial task for optimizing the performance of large language models (LLMs). It requires complex reasoning to examine the model's errors, hypothesize what is missing or misleading in the current prompt, and communicate the task with clarity. While recent works indicate that LLMs can be meta-prompted to perform automatic prompt engineering, their potentials may not be fully untapped due to the lack of sufficient guidance to elicit complex reasoning capabilities in LLMs in the meta-prompt. In this work, we investigate the problem of "prompt engineering a prompt engineer" -- constructing a meta-prompt that more effectively guides LLMs to perform automatic prompt engineering. We introduce and analyze key components, such as a step-by-step reasoning template and context specification, which lead to improved performance. In addition, inspired by common optimization concepts such as batch size, step size and momentum, we introduce their verbalized counterparts to the meta-prompt and investigate their effects. Our final method, named PE2, finds a prompt that outperforms "let's think step by step" by 6.3% on the MultiArith dataset and 3.1% on the GSM8K dataset. To demonstrate its versatility, we apply PE2 to the Instruction Induction benchmark, a suite of counterfactual tasks, and a lengthy, real-world industrial prompt. In these settings, PE2 achieves strong performance and outperforms prior automatic prompt engineering baselines. Further, we show that PE2 makes meaningful and targeted prompt edits, amends erroneous or incomplete prompts, and presents non-trivial counterfactual reasoning abilities.

Submitted to arXiv on 09 Nov. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2311.05661v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the paper titled "Prompt Engineering a Prompt Engineer," authors Qinyuan Ye, Maxamed Axmed, Reid Pryzant, and Fereshte Khani address the challenging task of prompt engineering for optimizing the performance of large language models (LLMs). They highlight the need for complex reasoning to identify errors in LLMs, determine what is missing or misleading in the current prompt, and effectively communicate the task. While previous works have explored meta-prompting LLMs for automatic prompt engineering, their potential remains untapped due to insufficient guidance for eliciting complex reasoning capabilities. To overcome this limitation, the authors propose the problem of "prompt engineering a prompt engineer" and aim to construct a meta-prompt that better guides LLMs in performing automatic prompt engineering. They introduce and analyze key components such as a step-by-step reasoning template and context specification which lead to improved performance. Inspired by optimization concepts like batch size, step size, and momentum they also introduce their verbalized counterparts into the meta-prompt and investigate their effects. The authors present their final method called PE2 which outperforms existing approaches by 6.3% on the MultiArith dataset and 3.1% on the GSM8K dataset. To demonstrate its versatility they apply PE2 to various scenarios including Instruction Induction benchmark counterfactual tasks suite and a real-world industrial prompt where it achieves strong performance surpassing prior automatic prompt engineering baselines. Furthermore they show that PE2 makes meaningful and targeted prompt edits while addressing erroneous or incomplete prompts as well as exhibiting non-trivial counterfactual reasoning abilities. Overall this work contributes to advancing automatic prompt engineering techniques by providing more effective guidance for LLMs through a refined meta-prompt approach.
Created on 31 Dec. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.