, , , ,
In their work titled "PRODIGy: a PROfile-based DIalogue Generation dataset," authors Daniela Occhipinti, Serra Sinem Tekiroglu, and Marco Guerini explore the benefits of providing dialogue agents with profile representations to enhance consistency and coherence in conversations. They note that existing profile-based dialogue datasets often contain either simplistic and dialogue-specific explicit profiles or challenging-to-collect implicit representations. To address this limitation, the authors propose a unified framework that integrates both standard and sophisticated profile representations by aligning each dialogue with various speaker attributes such as communication style, biographies, and personality. Through their new resource, the authors evaluate several baseline models constructed using generative language models with different profile configurations. Their automatic evaluation reveals that profile-based models exhibit superior generalization capabilities compared to models trained solely on dialogues, across both in-domain and cross-domain scenarios. These findings hold true for fine-tuned models and instruction-based Language Models (LLMs). Human evaluation further confirms a preference for responses that are consistent with both the speaker's profile and the context of the conversation. To address privacy concerns, the experiments are conducted under two configurations: inter-character and intra-character. In inter-character setups, the language model stores character information within its internal representation, while in intra-character settings, personal data is not retained but only utilized during inference. This study highlights the importance of incorporating comprehensive profile representations in training dialogue agents for improved conversational outcomes.
- - Authors explore benefits of providing dialogue agents with profile representations to enhance consistency and coherence in conversations
- - Existing profile-based dialogue datasets often contain simplistic or challenging-to-collect profiles
- - Proposed unified framework integrates standard and sophisticated profile representations aligned with speaker attributes like communication style, biographies, and personality
- - Profile-based models show superior generalization capabilities compared to models trained solely on dialogues in both in-domain and cross-domain scenarios
- - Human evaluation confirms preference for responses consistent with speaker's profile and conversation context
Summary- Authors study how giving chatbots profiles can make them talk better.
- Some datasets with chatbot profiles are too simple or hard to get.
- A new plan mixes basic and fancy profiles that match how people talk.
- Chatbots with profiles do better than those without in different situations.
- People like chatbot answers that fit the speaker's profile and the conversation.
Definitions1. Dialogue agents: Computer programs that can have conversations with people.
2. Profile representations: Information about a person used to make chatbots sound more consistent and logical in conversations.
3. Coherence: Making sense and being logical in what you say or write.
4. Generalization capabilities: Ability to apply knowledge or skills learned in one situation to another situation.
5. Human evaluation: People checking and judging something based on their own opinions and experiences.
Introduction
Dialogue generation has become an increasingly popular research area in recent years, with the rise of virtual assistants and chatbots. However, one of the main challenges in developing effective dialogue agents is ensuring consistency and coherence in conversations. This is where profile-based dialogue generation comes into play.
In their paper titled "PRODIGy: a PROfile-based DIalogue Generation dataset," authors Daniela Occhipinti, Serra Sinem Tekiroglu, and Marco Guerini propose a new framework for incorporating profile representations into dialogue generation models. They argue that existing datasets often lack comprehensive profiles or rely on challenging-to-collect implicit representations. The authors aim to bridge this gap by providing a unified framework that integrates both standard and sophisticated profile representations.
The PRODIGy Dataset
The PRODIGy dataset consists of over 10,000 dialogues between two characters from different domains such as movies, books, TV shows, etc. Each dialogue is aligned with various speaker attributes such as communication style, biographies, and personality traits. These attributes are used to construct explicit profiles for each character.
One unique aspect of the PRODIGy dataset is its inclusion of both inter-character and intra-character setups. In inter-character setups, the language model stores character information within its internal representation during training. In contrast, intra-character settings do not retain personal data but only utilize it during inference to address privacy concerns.
Benefits of Profile Representations
The authors evaluate several baseline models trained on the PRODIGy dataset using generative language models with different profile configurations. Their automatic evaluation reveals that profile-based models outperform those trained solely on dialogues across both in-domain and cross-domain scenarios.
Furthermore, human evaluation confirms a preference for responses that are consistent with both the speaker's profile and the context of the conversation. This highlights the importance of incorporating comprehensive profile representations in training dialogue agents for improved conversational outcomes.
Generalization Capabilities
One of the key findings of this study is that profile-based models exhibit superior generalization capabilities compared to traditional dialogue generation models. This means that these models can generate responses that are consistent and coherent even when faced with new or unseen scenarios. This is a crucial aspect of developing effective dialogue agents, as they need to be able to handle a wide range of conversations and topics.
Privacy Concerns
In today's world, privacy concerns are at an all-time high, especially when it comes to personal data. The authors address this issue by providing two different setups for their experiments – inter-character and intra-character. By using intra-character setups, personal data is not retained during training, thus addressing privacy concerns while still utilizing profile information during inference.
Conclusion
The PRODIGy dataset and framework proposed by Occhipinti et al. provide valuable insights into the benefits of incorporating comprehensive profile representations in dialogue generation models. Their experiments demonstrate the superiority of profile-based models in terms of consistency, coherence, and generalization capabilities. Furthermore, their inclusion of both inter-character and intra-character setups addresses privacy concerns while still utilizing important profile information.
This research has significant implications for the development of more human-like dialogue agents that can handle a wide range of conversations effectively. It also highlights the importance of considering privacy concerns when working with personal data in AI systems.
Overall, "PRODIGy: a PROfile-based DIalogue Generation dataset" makes a valuable contribution to the field of dialogue generation and provides a solid foundation for future research in this area.