GROOViST: A Metric for Grounding Objects in Visual Storytelling
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Authors: Aditya K Surikuchi, Sandro Pezzelle, and Raquel Fernández
- Topic: Evaluation of stories generated for a sequence of images (visual storytelling)
- Aspects to consider: Coherence, grammatical correctness, visual grounding
- Emphasis on evaluating degree of grounding in stories
- Thorough analysis of existing metrics and tools
- Introduction of GROOViST:
- Addresses cross-modal dependencies, temporal misalignments, human intuitions
- Modular design for assessing components individually
- Enhances granularity and accuracy of evaluations in visual storytelling tasks
- Presentation at EMNLP 2023 main conference proceedings
Authors: Aditya K Surikuchi, Sandro Pezzelle, Raquel Fernández
Abstract: A proper evaluation of stories generated for a sequence of images -- the task commonly referred to as visual storytelling -- must consider multiple aspects, such as coherence, grammatical correctness, and visual grounding. In this work, we focus on evaluating the degree of grounding, that is, the extent to which a story is about the entities shown in the images. We analyze current metrics, both designed for this purpose and for general vision-text alignment. Given their observed shortcomings, we propose a novel evaluation tool, GROOViST, that accounts for cross-modal dependencies, temporal misalignments (the fact that the order in which entities appear in the story and the image sequence may not match), and human intuitions on visual grounding. An additional advantage of GROOViST is its modular design, where the contribution of each component can be assessed and interpreted individually.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.