Assessing the drag implications of hydrogen fuel utilization in small aircraft: a preliminary numerical analysis

AI-generated keywords: Hydrogen fuel Sustainable aviation Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Aerodynamic impact Drag reduction technologies

AI-generated Key Points

  • Urgent need for cleaner and sustainable aviation fuels
  • Interest in utilizing hydrogen as an alternative to traditional hydrocarbon fuels
  • Challenges of transitioning to hydrogen due to lower volumetric energy density
  • Study conducted using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations with ANSYS Fluent 2022 R1 solver
  • Investigation focused on aerodynamic implications of adopting hydrogen fuel in small aircraft, specifically the Bonanza G36 model
  • Three types of hydrogen fuel considered: gaseous hydrogen at 350 bar, gaseous hydrogen at 700 bar, and liquid hydrogen
  • Promising 64% reduction in fuel weight compared to gasoline, but significant increase in storage volume required (263% to 896%)
  • Aerodynamic impact quantified in terms of drag: increases of 67.32%, 48.42%, and 27.05% for different types of hydrogen fuel
  • Findings highlight challenges in transitioning to hydrogen fuel but also suggest potential for innovative fuel tank designs and drag reduction technologies
  • Study underscores complexities involved in adopting hydrogen fuel in aviation and offers insights for further research
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Serena Zhang, Dong Eun Lee, Li Qiao

arXiv: 2310.01265v1 - DOI (physics.flu-dyn)
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: The urgent need for cleaner, sustainable aviation fuels has driven interest in the use of hydrogen as a potential replacement for traditional hydrocarbon fuels in aviation. However, transitioning to hydrogen presents significant challenges due to its lower volumetric energy density which requires a larger fuel volume for equivalent energy. This study uses Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations, utilizing the ANSYS Fluent 2022 R1 solver, to conduct a preliminary investigation on the aerodynamic implications of adopting hydrogen fuel in small aircraft, specifically the Bonanza G36. Three different types of hydrogen fuel - gaseous hydrogen at 350 bar, gaseous hydrogen at 700 bar, and liquid hydrogen - were considered. Despite a promising 64% reduction in fuel weight in comparison to gasoline, the volume required for hydrogen fuel was found to increase significantly, with values ranging from 263% to 896% compared to the base case. The aerodynamic impact was quantified in terms of drag, with the study revealing increases of 67.32%, 48.42%, and 27.05% for gaseous hydrogen at 350 bar, gaseous hydrogen at 700 bar, and liquid hydrogen respectively. While the findings present a challenge, they also set a platform for exploring innovative fuel tank designs and drag reduction technologies to mitigate these effects. This study underscores the complexities involved in transitioning to hydrogen fuel in aviation, contributing valuable insights to guide further research towards sustainable aviation.

Submitted to arXiv on 02 Oct. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2310.01265v1

The urgent need for cleaner and sustainable aviation fuels has sparked interest in utilizing hydrogen as a potential alternative to traditional hydrocarbon fuels in the aviation industry. However, transitioning to hydrogen poses significant challenges due to its lower volumetric energy density. This necessitates a larger fuel volume to achieve equivalent energy levels and presents complexities in adoption. To address this issue, a study was conducted using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations with the ANSYS Fluent 2022 R1 solver. The study focused on investigating the aerodynamic implications of adopting hydrogen fuel in small aircraft, specifically the Bonanza G36 model. Three different types of hydrogen fuel were considered: gaseous hydrogen at 350 bar, gaseous hydrogen at 700 bar, and liquid hydrogen. Despite showing a promising 64% reduction in fuel weight compared to gasoline, it was found that the volume required for storing hydrogen fuel increased significantly. This ranged from 263% to 896% compared to the base case. The study quantified the aerodynamic impact in terms of drag and revealed increases of 67.32%, 48.42%, and 27.05% for gaseous hydrogen at 350 bar, gaseous hydrogen at 700 bar, and liquid hydrogen respectively. While these findings present challenges in transitioning to hydrogen fuel due to increased drag and storage volume requirements, they also provide a foundation for exploring innovative fuel tank designs and drag reduction technologies to mitigate these effects. This study underscores the complexities involved in adopting hydrogen fuel in aviation and offers valuable insights that can guide further research towards achieving sustainable aviation practices. Authors Serena Zhang from The Bishop’s School in La Jolla, CA along with Dong Eun Lee and Li Qiao from Purdue University's School of Aeronautics and Astronautics in West Lafayette, IN contributed to this preliminary numerical analysis on assessing the drag implications of utilizing hydrogen fuel in small aircraft.
Created on 04 Apr. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.