Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2309.12938v1

explores the use of large language models (LLMs) to assist developers in improving code quality. The quality of code is crucial as it impacts the reliability, maintainability, and security of software projects. To identify code quality issues, static analysis tools are commonly used in developer workflows. However, addressing these issues requires additional effort from developers. In response to this challenge, the authors propose a tool called CORE (COde REvisions), which utilizes a pair of LLMs - a proposer and a ranker. The proposer LLM takes recommendations from static analysis tools and generates candidate code revisions based on them. These candidates undergo static quality checks, and those that pass are retained. However, there is a possibility that the proposer LLM may introduce unintended functionality changes that go undetected by static analysis. To address this concern, the ranker LLM evaluates the changes made by the proposer using an acceptance criteria rubric similar to what a human developer would enforce. CORE leverages the scores assigned by the ranker LLM to rank the candidate revisions before presenting them to developers. The results show that CORE was able to revise 59.2% of Python files across 52 quality checks so that they passed scrutiny by both a tool and a human reviewer. Additionally, the ranker LLM reduced false positives by 25.8% in these cases. Furthermore, CORE produced revisions that passed static analysis tools in 76.8% of Java files across 10 quality checks, comparable to a specialized program repair tool's success rate of 78.3%. Notably, CORE achieved these results with significantly less engineering effort. Overall, this research demonstrates how LLMs can be effectively utilized to assist developers in resolving code quality issues and improving software reliability and maintainability while reducing false positives generated by static analysis tools.

• - Large language models (LLMs) can assist developers in improving code quality
• - Code quality impacts reliability, maintainability, and security of software projects
• - Static analysis tools are commonly used to identify code quality issues
• - CORE (COde REvisions) is a tool that uses LLMs to generate candidate code revisions based on recommendations from static analysis tools
• - CORE includes a proposer LLM and a ranker LLM
• - The proposer LLM generates candidate revisions, which undergo static quality checks
• - The ranker LLM evaluates the changes made by the proposer using an acceptance criteria rubric similar to what a human developer would enforce
• - CORE ranks the candidate revisions based on scores assigned by the ranker LLM before presenting them to developers
• - CORE revised 59.2% of Python files across 52 quality checks to pass scrutiny by both a tool and a human reviewer
• - The ranker LLM reduced false positives by 25.8%
• - CORE produced revisions that passed static analysis tools in 76.8% of Java files across 10 quality checks, comparable to a specialized program repair tool's success rate of 78.3%
• - CORE achieved these results with significantly less engineering effort

Large language models (LLMs) are tools that can help developers make their code better. Code quality means how good the code is and it affects how reliable, easy to maintain, and secure the software is. Static analysis tools are programs that look for problems in the code. CORE is a tool that uses LLMs to suggest changes to the code based on what static analysis tools find. CORE has two parts: one part suggests changes and the other part decides if those changes are good or not. CORE checks many different things in the code and gives scores to each suggested change. CORE was able to improve many Python and Java files by suggesting changes that passed all the tests.

Introduction

In today's digital age, software development has become an integral part of our lives. From mobile apps to complex systems, software is used in almost every aspect of our daily routines. With the increasing demand for reliable and secure software, the quality of code has become a crucial factor in determining the success of a project. Poorly written code can lead to bugs, security vulnerabilities, and maintenance issues that can be costly and time-consuming to fix. To ensure high-quality code, developers use static analysis tools as part of their workflow. These tools scan source code for potential errors or violations of coding standards and provide recommendations for improvement. However, addressing these issues requires additional effort from developers, which can slow down the development process. In response to this challenge, researchers have explored the use of large language models (LLMs) to assist developers in improving code quality. LLMs are powerful artificial intelligence (AI) models that have been trained on vast amounts of text data and can generate human-like text based on input prompts. One such research paper titled "CORE: Using Large Language Models to Improve Code Quality" by authors Srinivasan Iyer et al., explores how LLMs can be utilized to assist developers in resolving code quality issues while reducing false positives generated by static analysis tools.

The CORE Tool

The authors propose a tool called CORE (COde REvisions), which utilizes a pair of LLMs - a proposer and a ranker - to improve code quality efficiently. The proposer LLM takes recommendations from static analysis tools and generates candidate revisions based on them. These candidates undergo static quality checks using existing tools such as Pylint for Python files or FindBugs for Java files. However, there is always a possibility that the changes made by the proposer LLM may introduce unintended functionality changes that go undetected by static analysis. To address this concern, the ranker LLM evaluates the changes made by the proposer using an acceptance criteria rubric similar to what a human developer would enforce.

Results

The authors evaluated CORE on two different datasets - Python files from open-source projects and Java files from Google's internal codebase. The results showed that CORE was able to revise 59.2% of Python files across 52 quality checks so that they passed scrutiny by both a tool and a human reviewer. Additionally, the ranker LLM reduced false positives by 25.8% in these cases, indicating its effectiveness in identifying unintended functionality changes introduced by the proposer LLM. Furthermore, CORE produced revisions that passed static analysis tools in 76.8% of Java files across 10 quality checks, comparable to a specialized program repair tool's success rate of 78.3%. Notably, CORE achieved these results with significantly less engineering effort compared to traditional program repair tools.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this research paper demonstrates how LLMs can be effectively utilized to assist developers in resolving code quality issues and improving software reliability and maintainability while reducing false positives generated by static analysis tools. By leveraging the power of AI-based language models, CORE provides developers with efficient solutions for addressing code quality issues without compromising on accuracy or introducing unintended functionality changes. Future work could explore incorporating more advanced techniques such as natural language processing (NLP) into the proposed approach to further improve its performance and accuracy. Overall, this research opens up new possibilities for utilizing AI technologies in software development processes and highlights their potential impact on improving overall code quality.