Cultural Alignment in Large Language Models: An Explanatory Analysis Based on Hofstede's Cultural Dimensions

AI-generated keywords: Cultural Alignment Large Language Models Hofstede's Cultural Dimensions Global Acceptance Ethical Use

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Research focuses on implications of deploying large language models (LLMs) on diverse cultural backgrounds
  • Introduces Cultural Alignment Test (Hofstede's CAT) based on Hofstede's cultural dimensions framework
  • Study applies test to LLMs like Llama 2, GPT-3.5, and GPT-4 across regions like the United States, China, and Arab countries
  • Significant differences in cultural alignment among tested LLMs observed
  • GPT-4 shows better adaptation to Chinese cultural settings compared to American or Arab cultures
  • Language-specific fine-tuning impacts behavior of LLMs in response to cultural prompts
  • Importance of culturally diverse development in AI for global acceptance and ethical use emphasized
  • Need for further research and development in aligning LLMs with diverse cultural values highlighted
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Reem I. Masoud, Ziquan Liu, Martin Ferianc, Philip Treleaven, Miguel Rodrigues

31 pages

Abstract: The deployment of large language models (LLMs) raises concerns regarding their cultural misalignment and potential ramifications on individuals and societies with diverse cultural backgrounds. While the discourse has focused mainly on political and social biases, our research proposes a Cultural Alignment Test (Hoftede's CAT) to quantify cultural alignment using Hofstede's cultural dimension framework, which offers an explanatory cross-cultural comparison through the latent variable analysis. We apply our approach to quantitatively evaluate LLMs, namely Llama 2, GPT-3.5, and GPT-4, against the cultural dimensions of regions like the United States, China, and Arab countries, using different prompting styles and exploring the effects of language-specific fine-tuning on the models' behavioural tendencies and cultural values. Our results quantify the cultural alignment of LLMs and reveal the difference between LLMs in explanatory cultural dimensions. Our study demonstrates that while all LLMs struggle to grasp cultural values, GPT-4 shows a unique capability to adapt to cultural nuances, particularly in Chinese settings. However, it faces challenges with American and Arab cultures. The research also highlights that fine-tuning LLama 2 models with different languages changes their responses to cultural questions, emphasizing the need for culturally diverse development in AI for worldwide acceptance and ethical use. For more details or to contribute to this research, visit our GitHub page https://github.com/reemim/Hofstedes_CAT/

Submitted to arXiv on 25 Aug. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2309.12342v2

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their research titled "Cultural Alignment in Large Language Models: An Explanatory Analysis Based on Hofstede's Cultural Dimensions," authors Reem I. Masoud, Ziquan Liu, Martin Ferianc, Philip Treleaven, and Miguel Rodrigues delve into the implications of deploying large language models (LLMs) on diverse cultural backgrounds. The study introduces a Cultural Alignment Test (Hoftede's CAT) that utilizes Hofstede's cultural dimension framework to quantify the alignment of LLMs with different cultural values. By applying this test to popular LLMs like Llama 2, GPT-3.5, and GPT-4 across regions such as the United States, China, and Arab countries, the researchers explore how these models respond to various cultural prompts and the impact of language-specific fine-tuning on their behavior. The results of the study reveal significant differences in cultural alignment among the LLMs tested. While all models struggle to fully grasp cultural nuances, GPT-4 stands out for its ability to adapt to Chinese cultural settings more effectively than American or Arab cultures. The research also highlights how fine-tuning Llama 2 models with different languages can alter their responses to cultural questions, underscoring the importance of culturally diverse development in AI for global acceptance and ethical use. This comprehensive analysis sheds light on the complexities of aligning LLMs with diverse cultural values and emphasizes the need for further research and development in this area. By quantifying cultural alignment using a standardized framework like Hoftede's CAT, this study contributes valuable insights towards creating more culturally sensitive AI systems that can better serve individuals and societies worldwide. For those interested in contributing or learning more about this research, additional details can be found on their GitHub page https://github.com/reemim/Hofstedes_CAT/.
Created on 06 Jul. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.