OpenChat: Advancing Open-source Language Models with Mixed-Quality Data

AI-generated keywords: OpenChat

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Open-source large language models like LLaMA have gained popularity
  • Models have been improved through supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning fine-tuning (RLFT)
  • SFT treats all training data equally, while RLFT requires high-quality preference data
  • OpenChat is a framework proposed to advance open-source language models using mixed-quality data
  • OpenChat focuses on SFT training data with a small amount of expert data and a large proportion of sub-optimal data without preference labels
  • OpenChat introduces C(onditioned)-RLFT, which treats different data sources as reward labels and learns a class-conditioned policy
  • C(onditioned)-RLFT can be solved through single-stage, RL-free supervised learning, avoiding costly human preference labeling
  • Extensive experiments were conducted on three standard benchmarks to evaluate the performance of OpenChat.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Guan Wang, Sijie Cheng, Xianyuan Zhan, Xiangang Li, Sen Song, Yang Liu

Abstract: Nowadays, open-source large language models like LLaMA have emerged. Recent developments have incorporated supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning fine-tuning (RLFT) to align these models with human goals. However, SFT methods treat all training data with mixed quality equally, while RLFT methods require high-quality pairwise or ranking-based preference data. In this study, we present a novel framework, named OpenChat, to advance open-source language models with mixed-quality data. Specifically, we consider the general SFT training data, consisting of a small amount of expert data mixed with a large proportion of sub-optimal data, without any preference labels. We propose the C(onditioned)-RLFT, which regards different data sources as coarse-grained reward labels and learns a class-conditioned policy to leverage complementary data quality information. Interestingly, the optimal policy in C-RLFT can be easily solved through single-stage, RL-free supervised learning, which is lightweight and avoids costly human preference labeling. Through extensive experiments on three standard benchmarks, our openchat-13b fine-tuned with C-RLFT achieves the highest average performance among all 13b open-source language models. Moreover, we use AGIEval to validate the model generalization performance, in which only openchat-13b surpasses the base model. Finally, we conduct a series of analyses to shed light on the effectiveness and robustness of OpenChat. Our code, data, and models are publicly available at https://github.com/imoneoi/openchat.

Submitted to arXiv on 20 Sep. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2309.11235v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

Open-source large language models like LLaMA have become increasingly popular in recent years. These models have been enhanced through supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning fine-tuning (RLFT) techniques to align them with human goals. However, SFT methods treat all training data with mixed quality equally, while RLFT methods require high-quality pairwise or ranking-based preference data. To address these limitations, the authors of this study propose a novel framework called OpenChat. The goal of OpenChat is to advance open-source language models using mixed-quality data. Specifically, they focus on the general SFT training data, which consists of a small amount of expert data mixed with a large proportion of sub-optimal data without any preference labels. The authors introduce a method called C(onditioned)-RLFT as part of the OpenChat framework. This approach treats different data sources as coarse-grained reward labels and learns a class-conditioned policy to leverage complementary information about the quality of the data. Interestingly, the optimal policy in C-RLFT can be easily solved through single-stage, RL-free supervised learning, which is lightweight and avoids the need for costly human preference labeling. Extensive experiments were conducted on three standard benchmarks to evaluate the performance of OpenChat.
Created on 26 Dec. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.