Accelerated Gradient Descent via Long Steps

AI-generated keywords: Gradient Descent Smooth Convex Optimization Long Steps Accelerated Convergence Rate Das Gupta et al.

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Authors explore accelerated convergence rates in smooth convex optimization problems
  • Previous work by Grimmer showed that longer steps can improve gradient descent's convergence guarantees
  • Authors provide proof of achieving an accelerated rate faster than O(1/T)
  • Convergence rate demonstrated as O(1/T^{1.02449}) using nonconstant nonperiodic stepsizes
  • Theory for strongly convex optimization allows for big-O convergence rate accelerations from long steps
  • Open question remains whether the conjectured rates of O(1/T^{1.178}) or O(1/T^2) can be achieved
  • Paper contributes to understanding of accelerated convergence rates and benefits of longer steps in gradient descent algorithms
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Benjamin Grimmer, Kevin Shu, Alex L. Wang

Abstract: Recently Grimmer [1] showed for smooth convex optimization by utilizing longer steps periodically, gradient descent's state-of-the-art O(1/T) convergence guarantees can be improved by constant factors, conjecturing an accelerated rate strictly faster than O(1/T) could be possible. Here we prove such a big-O gain, establishing gradient descent's first accelerated convergence rate in this setting. Namely, we prove a O(1/T^{1.02449}) rate for smooth convex minimization by utilizing a nonconstant nonperiodic sequence of increasingly large stepsizes. It remains open if one can achieve the O(1/T^{1.178}) rate conjectured by Das Gupta et. al. [2] or the optimal gradient method rate of O(1/T^2). Big-O convergence rate accelerations from long steps follow from our theory for strongly convex optimization, similar to but somewhat weaker than those concurrently developed by Altschuler and Parrilo [3].

Submitted to arXiv on 18 Sep. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2309.09961v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their paper titled "Accelerated Gradient Descent via Long Steps," authors Benjamin Grimmer, Kevin Shu, and Alex L. Wang explore the potential for accelerated convergence rates in smooth convex optimization problems. They build upon previous work by Grimmer [1], who demonstrated that utilizing longer steps periodically can improve gradient descent's state-of-the-art O(1/T) convergence guarantees by constant factors. Grimmer also conjectured the possibility of achieving an accelerated rate faster than O(1/T). In this study, the authors provide a proof of such a big-O gain and establish gradient descent's first accelerated convergence rate in this setting. Specifically, they demonstrate a convergence rate of O(1/T^{1.02449}) for smooth convex minimization by employing a nonconstant nonperiodic sequence of increasingly large stepsizes. The authors note that their theory for strongly convex optimization allows for big-O convergence rate accelerations from long steps, which are somewhat weaker but similar to those concurrently developed by Altschuler and Parrilo [3]. However, it remains an open question whether one can achieve the O(1/T^{1.178}) rate conjectured by Das Gupta et al. [2] or even reach the optimal gradient method rate of O(1/T^2). Overall, this paper contributes to the understanding of accelerated convergence rates in smooth convex optimization problems and provides new insights into the potential benefits of utilizing longer steps in gradient descent algorithms. References[1] Grimmer[2] Das Gupta et al.
Created on 20 Sep. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.