"I'm Not Confident in Debiasing AI Systems Since I Know Too Little": Teaching AI Creators About Gender Bias Through Hands-on Tutorials

AI-generated keywords: Gender bias AI systems Educational interventions Hands-on tutorials Ethical responsibility

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Gender bias in AI systems leads to negative user experiences, perpetuates injustices, and causes mental harm to women.
  • Current educational curricula for AI creators lack adequate preparation to recognize and mitigate gender bias in their work.
  • Hands-on tutorials were designed to raise awareness among AI creators about gender bias in AI systems.
  • The tutorials aimed to enhance participants' understanding of the sources of gender bias and debiasing techniques.
  • Evaluation with a group of 18 AI creators showed a significant improvement in awareness and knowledge regarding gender bias after engaging with the tutorials.
  • The study highlights the potential for educational interventions to complement deficiencies in CS/AI courses related to gender bias education.
  • The authors provide design implications and a rubric for future research, educational initiatives, and design efforts addressing gender bias in AI systems.
  • Equipping AI creators with tools and knowledge is crucial for effectively tackling gender bias within their work.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Kyrie Zhixuan Zhou, Jiaxun Cao, Xiaowen Yuan, Daniel E. Weissglass, Zachary Kilhoffer, Madelyn Rose Sanfilippo, Xin Tong

Abstract: Gender bias is rampant in AI systems, causing bad user experience, injustices, and mental harm to women. School curricula fail to educate AI creators on this topic, leaving them unprepared to mitigate gender bias in AI. In this paper, we designed hands-on tutorials to raise AI creators' awareness of gender bias in AI and enhance their knowledge of sources of gender bias and debiasing techniques. The tutorials were evaluated with 18 AI creators, including AI researchers, AI industrial practitioners (i.e., developers and product managers), and students who had learned AI. Their improved awareness and knowledge demonstrated the effectiveness of our tutorials, which have the potential to complement the insufficient AI gender bias education in CS/AI courses. Based on the findings, we synthesize design implications and a rubric to guide future research, education, and design efforts.

Submitted to arXiv on 15 Sep. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2309.08121v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their paper titled "I'm Not Confident in Debiasing AI Systems Since I Know Too Little": Teaching AI Creators About Gender Bias Through Hands-on Tutorials, authors Kyrie Zhixuan Zhou, Jiaxun Cao, Xiaowen Yuan, Daniel E. Weissglass, Zachary Kilhoffer, Madelyn Rose Sanfilippo, and Xin Tong address the pervasive issue of gender bias in AI systems. They highlight how this bias leads to negative user experiences and perpetuates injustices while causing mental harm to women. The authors identify a critical gap in current educational curricula for AI creators that fails to adequately prepare them to recognize and mitigate gender bias in their work. To bridge this gap, they designed hands-on tutorials aimed at raising awareness among AI creators about gender bias in AI systems. These tutorials were specifically crafted to enhance participants' understanding of the sources of gender bias and various debiasing techniques that can be employed. The effectiveness of these tutorials was evaluated with a group of 18 AI creators comprising researchers, industrial practitioners (such as developers and product managers), and students with prior knowledge of AI. The results demonstrated a significant improvement in participants' awareness and knowledge regarding gender bias in AI systems after engaging with the tutorials. This positive outcome highlights the potential for such educational interventions to complement existing deficiencies in CS/AI courses related to gender bias education. Based on their findings, the authors provide valuable design implications and a rubric that can guide future research endeavors, educational initiatives, and design efforts aimed at addressing gender bias in AI systems. Overall, this study sheds light on the importance of equipping AI creators with the necessary tools and knowledge to effectively tackle gender bias within their work. By offering practical hands-on tutorials focused on this crucial issue , the authors advocate for a more inclusive and ethically responsible approach to developing AI technologies that prioritize fairness and equality for all users .
Created on 24 Nov. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.