Conversational Swarm Intelligence, a Pilot Study
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- The pilot study introduces Conversational Swarm Intelligence (CSI) as a method for facilitating real-time networked conversations among large human groups.
- CSI utilizes conversational agents powered by Large Language Models (LLMs) to enable local dialog within small deliberative groups and global propagation of conversational content across a larger population.
- The aim of CSI is to combine the advantages of small-group deliberative reasoning with the benefits of large-scale collective intelligence.
- Participants using the CSI structure produced 30% more contributions than those in the centralized chat room, with 7.2% less variance in contribution quantity among users.
- These findings suggest that CSI has the potential to enhance collaboration and information sharing within large human groups by leveraging swarm-like dynamics and advanced language models.
- The study is pending for presentation at the Collective Intelligence 2023 conference organized by ACM.
Authors: Louis Rosenberg, Gregg Willcox, Hans Schumann, Miles Bader, Ganesh Mani, Kokoro Sagae, Devang Acharya, Yuxin Zheng, Andrew Kim, Jialing Deng
Abstract: Conversational Swarm Intelligence (CSI) is a new method for enabling large human groups to hold real-time networked conversations using a technique modeled on the dynamics of biological swarms. Through the novel use of conversational agents powered by Large Language Models (LLMs), the CSI structure simultaneously enables local dialog among small deliberative groups and global propagation of conversational content across a larger population. In this way, CSI combines the benefits of small-group deliberative reasoning and large-scale collective intelligence. In this pilot study, participants deliberating in conversational swarms (via text chat) (a) produced 30% more contributions (p<0.05) than participants deliberating in a standard centralized chat room and (b) demonstrated 7.2% less variance in contribution quantity. These results indicate that users contributed more content and participated more evenly when using the CSI structure.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.