Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2309.02065v1

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has made significant advancements through machine learning (ML) methods like deep learning (DL), which have enabled AI to tackle tasks previously considered impossible. However, these ML methods often require substantial computational power, consume high amounts of energy, and contribute to carbon emissions that drive climate change. Moreover, the platforms on which ML systems operate also have environmental impacts beyond carbon emissions. To address these concerns and improve the environmental sustainability of ML, the industry and ML community have focused on increasing efficiency in terms of compute and energy consumption. However, this perspective argues that efficiency alone is insufficient to make ML environmentally sustainable. The authors present three key discrepancies between efficiency and the overall environmental sustainability of ML. By considering the various variables that interact with efficiency, the authors comprehensively demonstrate why efficiency alone cannot fully mitigate the environmental impacts of ML. They highlight both technical and non-technical reasons at multiple levels of granularity. Based on their analysis, they propose systems thinking as a viable approach to holistically improve the environmental sustainability of ML. In conclusion, while increasing efficiency is an important step towards reducing the environmental footprint of ML systems, it is not enough on its own. A broader perspective that considers all aspects of ML's interaction with the environment is necessary to achieve true sustainability. This critical perspective calls for a shift towards systems thinking to address the environmental challenges posed by AI and ML technologies effectively.

• - Artificial Intelligence (AI) has made significant advancements through machine learning (ML) methods like deep learning (DL)
• - ML methods often require substantial computational power, consume high amounts of energy, and contribute to carbon emissions
• - Efficiency alone is insufficient to make ML environmentally sustainable
• - Three key discrepancies between efficiency and the overall environmental sustainability of ML are presented
• - Technical and non-technical reasons at multiple levels of granularity are highlighted
• - Systems thinking is proposed as a viable approach to improve the environmental sustainability of ML
• - Increasing efficiency is important but not enough on its own to reduce the environmental footprint of ML systems
• - A broader perspective that considers all aspects of ML's interaction with the environment is necessary for true sustainability
• - Systems thinking is needed to effectively address the environmental challenges posed by AI and ML technologies.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a type of technology that can learn and make decisions on its own. Machine learning (ML) is a method used in AI to help it learn and improve. Deep learning (DL) is a specific type of ML that has made AI even smarter. ML methods use a lot of computer power and energy, which can harm the environment. Just being efficient isn't enough to make ML environmentally friendly. We need to think about all the ways ML affects the environment and find better solutions. Systems thinking means looking at the big picture and considering everything involved in making ML sustainable."

Environmental Sustainability of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

In recent years, Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) have made significant advancements in tackling tasks previously considered impossible. However, these ML methods often require substantial computational power, consume high amounts of energy, and contribute to carbon emissions that drive climate change. To address these concerns and improve the environmental sustainability of ML, the industry and ML community have focused on increasing efficiency in terms of compute and energy consumption. But is this enough? This research paper argues that efficiency alone is insufficient to make ML environmentally sustainable. The authors present three key discrepancies between efficiency and the overall environmental sustainability of ML. By considering various variables that interact with efficiency, they demonstrate why it cannot fully mitigate the environmental impacts of ML. They highlight both technical and non-technical reasons at multiple levels of granularity. Based on their analysis, they propose systems thinking as a viable approach to holistically improve the environmental sustainability of ML.

The Three Discrepancies Between Efficiency & Environmental Sustainability

The authors identify three main discrepancies between efficiency improvements for AI/ML systems versus true environmental sustainability:

• Compute vs Energy Consumption: Efficiency gains are typically measured by reducing compute costs or improving throughput while ignoring energy consumption.
• Platforms & Infrastructure: Efficiency gains focus primarily on algorithms rather than platforms or infrastructure which can also have an impact on energy consumption.
• Non-Technical Factors: Efficiency gains do not take into account non-technical factors such as user behavior which can also affect energy consumption.

. These discrepancies illustrate why simply focusing on increasing efficiency is not enough to achieve true environmental sustainability for AI/ML systems; other aspects must be taken into consideration as well.

Systems Thinking for Holistic Improvement

In order to holistically improve the environmental sustainability of AI/ML technologies beyond just increasing efficiency, the authors propose a shift towards systems thinking – an approach which considers all aspects that interact with each other within a system in order to understand how changes in one area will affect another area within it. This means taking into account all components from hardware platforms down to user behavior when designing more sustainable solutions for AI/ML technologies; only then can we truly reduce their carbon footprint effectively without sacrificing performance or usability.

Conclusion

Increasing efficiency is an important step towards reducing the environmental footprint of AI/ML systems but it is not enough on its own; a broader perspective that considers all aspects including hardware platforms, algorithms, user behavior etc., is necessary to achieve true sustainability. Systems thinking provides us with a way forward by allowing us to consider all elements together so we can design more effective solutions for making our use of AI/ML technologies more environmentally friendly without compromising performance or usability..