Interactive and Concentrated Differential Privacy for Bandits

AI-generated keywords: Interactive learning

AI-generated Key Points

  • Bandits play a pivotal role in interactive learning schemes and modern recommender systems
  • Privacy concerns arise due to reliance on sensitive user data in these systems
  • This paper focuses on privacy in bandits with a trusted centralized decision-maker using interactive Differential Privacy (DP)
  • Study introduces zero Concentrated DP (zCDP) for understanding bandits, providing lower bounds on regret for finite-armed and linear bandits under $\rho$-global zCDP
  • Two novel $\rho$-global zCDP bandit algorithms proposed: AdaC-UCB for finite-armed bandits and AdaC-GOPE for linear bandits, leveraging Gaussian mechanism and adaptive episodes
  • AdaC-UCB achieves problem-dependent regret lower bound accurately, while AdaC-GOPE attains minimax regret lower bound with poly-logarithmic factors
  • Theoretical findings validated through experimental simulations, highlighting the balance between privacy preservation and performance optimization in bandit algorithms
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Achraf Azize, Debabrota Basu

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Bandits play a crucial role in interactive learning schemes and modern recommender systems. However, these systems often rely on sensitive user data, making privacy a critical concern. This paper investigates privacy in bandits with a trusted centralized decision-maker through the lens of interactive Differential Privacy (DP). While bandits under pure $\epsilon$-global DP have been well-studied, we contribute to the understanding of bandits under zero Concentrated DP (zCDP). We provide minimax and problem-dependent lower bounds on regret for finite-armed and linear bandits, which quantify the cost of $\rho$-global zCDP in these settings. These lower bounds reveal two hardness regimes based on the privacy budget $\rho$ and suggest that $\rho$-global zCDP incurs less regret than pure $\epsilon$-global DP. We propose two $\rho$-global zCDP bandit algorithms, AdaC-UCB and AdaC-GOPE, for finite-armed and linear bandits respectively. Both algorithms use a common recipe of Gaussian mechanism and adaptive episodes. We analyze the regret of these algorithms to show that AdaC-UCB achieves the problem-dependent regret lower bound up to multiplicative constants, while AdaC-GOPE achieves the minimax regret lower bound up to poly-logarithmic factors. Finally, we provide experimental validation of our theoretical results under different settings.

Submitted to arXiv on 01 Sep. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2309.00557v1

, , , , In the realm of interactive learning schemes and modern recommender systems, bandits play a pivotal role. However, these systems often rely on sensitive user data, raising significant privacy concerns. This paper delves into the realm of privacy in bandits with a trusted centralized decision-maker through the lens of interactive Differential Privacy (DP). Previous studies have extensively explored bandits under pure $\epsilon$-global DP, but this research contributes to understanding bandits under zero Concentrated DP (zCDP). By providing minimax and problem-dependent lower bounds on regret for both finite-armed and linear bandits, this study quantifies the impact of $\rho$-global zCDP in these settings. These lower bounds unveil two distinct hardness regimes based on the privacy budget $\rho$, indicating that $\rho$-global zCDP may result in less regret compared to pure $\epsilon$-global DP. To address these challenges, two novel $\rho$-global zCDP bandit algorithms are proposed: AdaC-UCB for finite-armed bandits and AdaC-GOPE for linear bandits. Both algorithms leverage a Gaussian mechanism and adaptive episodes as part of their design. Through rigorous analysis, it is demonstrated that AdaC-UCB achieves the problem-dependent regret lower bound with high accuracy while AdaC-GOPE attains the minimax regret lower bound with poly-logarithmic factors. The theoretical findings are further validated through experimental simulations conducted under various settings. The research sheds light on the intricate balance between privacy preservation and performance optimization in bandit algorithms, offering valuable insights for enhancing privacy-aware decision-making processes in interactive learning environments.
Created on 01 Jul. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.