Predicting the Yields of $z$ > 6.5 Quasar Surveys in the Era of Roman and Rubin
AI-generated Key Points
- Study focuses on predicting yields of high-redshift quasar surveys in the era of Roman and Rubin observatories
- Currently, around 70 luminous quasars discovered with redshifts greater than 6.5, but biased towards bright end
- Roman/Rubin survey expected to yield three times more quasars and probe broader range of luminosities
- Survey aims to identify high-redshift quasars, galactic dwarfs, and low-redshift compact galaxies as potential quasar candidates
- Mock catalogs based on population models used to evaluate selection completeness and efficiency
- Color dropout method in z and Y bands used for primary candidate selection, followed by Bayesian method for confirmation
- Overall selection completeness estimated to be >80% with efficiency of ~10% for redshifts between 6.5 and 9
- Predicted around 180 quasars at redshifts >6.5, 20 at redshifts >7.5, and 2 at redshifts >8.5 (dependent on assumptions)
- Proper motion information can be used to reject brown dwarfs as false positives for brighter stars (<mag 25) up to rejection rate of 50%
- Low-redshift galaxies dominate as contaminants at fainter magnitudes
- Roman/Rubin observatories have potential to discover statistical sample of early and faint quasars in universe
- Datasets from survey valuable for follow-up studies using James Webb Space Telescope and Extremely Large Telescopes
- Future observations will help determine faint end slope of quasar luminosity function and provide constraints on growth of supermassive black holes in early universe
Authors: Wei Leong Tee, Xiaohui Fan, Feige Wang, Jinyi Yang, Sangeeta Malhotra, James E. Rhoads
Abstract: Around 70 $z>6.5$ luminous quasars have been discovered, strongly biased toward the bright end, thus not providing a comprehensive view on quasar abundance beyond cosmic dawn. We present the predicted results of Roman/Rubin high-redshift quasar survey, yielding 3 times more, $2-4$ magnitudes deeper quasar samples, probing high-redshift quasars across broad range of luminosities, especially faint quasars at $L_\mathrm{bol}\sim 10^{10}\;L_{\odot}$ or $M_\mathrm{1450} \sim-22$ that are currently poorly explored. We include high-$z$ quasars, galactic dwarfs and low-$z$ compact galaxies with similar colors as quasar candidates. We create mock catalogs based on population models to evaluate selection completeness and efficiency. We utilize classical color dropout method in $z$ and $Y$ bands to select primary quasar candidates, followed up with Bayesian selection method to identify quasars. We show that overall selection completeness $> 80\%$ and efficiency $\sim 10\%$ at $6.5<z<9$, with 180 quasars at $z>6.5$, 20 at $z > 7.5$ and 2 at $z > 8.5$. The quasar yields depend sensitively on the assumed quasar luminosity shape and redshift evolution. Brown dwarf rejection through proper motion up to 50$\%$ can be made for stars brighter than 25 mag, low-$z$ galaxies dominate at fainter magnitude. Our results show that Roman/Rubin are able to discover a statistical sample of the earliest and faintest quasars in the Universe. The new valuable datasets worth follow up studies with James Webb Space Telescope and Extremely Large Telescopes, to determine quasar luminosity function faint end slope and constraint the supermassive black holes growth in the early Universe.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.