Innovating Computer Programming Pedagogy: The AI-Lab Framework for Generative AI Adoption

AI-generated keywords: Generative AI Problem-solving Algorithmic Thinking AI-Lab Junior-Year Wall

AI-generated Key Points

  • The rise of Generative AI (GenAI) has raised concerns about its impact on core skills development in Computer Science students
  • Nearly half of the students use GenAI for their homework assignments
  • The "Junior-Year Wall" phenomenon is a concern, where students struggle in advanced courses due to excessive reliance on GenAI
  • Researchers propose a pedagogical framework called "AI-Lab" to guide students in effectively leveraging GenAI within programming courses
  • AI-Lab emphasizes the benefits and potential of GenAI as a teaching instrument and encourages identifying and rectifying errors made by GenAI to enhance learning
  • AI-Lab provides tailored support using GenAI, such as topic introductions, detailed examples, corner case identification, rephrased explanations, and debugging assistance
  • The framework highlights the risks associated with over-dependence on GenAI and aims to intrinsically motivate students towards balanced usage
  • AI-Lab offers strategies for formulating prompts that elicit high-quality responses from GenAI
  • Specific activities within AI-Lab include familiarizing students with the chosen GenAI tool and requesting explanations from GenAI regarding upcoming lab session topics
  • The AI-Lab framework aims to guide students in effectively utilizing GenAI while preserving their core skill development during their foundational academic years.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Ethan Dickey, Andres Bejarano, Chirayu Garg

6 pages plus references and appendices
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Over the last year, the ascent of Generative AI (GenAI) has raised concerns about its impact on core skill development, such as problem-solving and algorithmic thinking, in Computer Science students. Preliminary anonymous surveys show that at least 48.5% of our students use GenAI for homework. With the proliferation of these tools, the academic community must contemplate the appropriate role of these tools in education. Neglecting this might culminate in a phenomenon we term the "Junior-Year Wall," where students struggle in advanced courses due to prior over-dependence on GenAI. Instead of discouraging GenAI use, which may unintentionally foster covert usage, our research seeks to answer: "How can educators guide students' interactions with GenAI to preserve core skill development during their foundational academic years?" We introduce "AI-Lab," a pedagogical framework for guiding students in effectively leveraging GenAI within core collegiate programming courses. This framework accentuates GenAI's benefits and potential as a pedagogical instrument. By identifying and rectifying GenAI's errors, students enrich their learning process. Moreover, AI-Lab presents opportunities to use GenAI for tailored support such as topic introductions, detailed examples, corner case identification, rephrased explanations, and debugging assistance. Importantly, the framework highlights the risks of GenAI over-dependence, aiming to intrinsically motivate students towards balanced usage. This approach is premised on the idea that mere warnings of GenAI's potential failures may be misconstrued as instructional shortcomings rather than genuine tool limitations. Additionally, AI-Lab offers strategies for formulating prompts to elicit high-quality GenAI responses. For educators, AI-Lab provides mechanisms to explore students' perceptions of GenAI's role in their learning experience.

Submitted to arXiv on 23 Aug. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2308.12258v1

The rise of Generative AI (GenAI) has sparked concerns about its impact on the development of core skills such as problem-solving and algorithmic thinking in Computer Science students. Surveys have shown that nearly half of the students use GenAI for their homework assignments. To address this issue, it is crucial for the academic community to consider the appropriate role of these tools in education to prevent a phenomenon known as the "Junior-Year Wall," where students struggle in advanced courses due to excessive reliance on GenAI. Rather than discouraging the use of GenAI, which may inadvertently lead to covert usage, researchers propose a pedagogical framework called "AI-Lab" to guide students in effectively leveraging GenAI within their collegiate programming courses. This framework emphasizes the benefits and potential of GenAI as a teaching instrument. By identifying and rectifying errors made by GenAI, students can enhance their learning process. Additionally, AI-Lab provides opportunities for tailored support using GenAI such as topic introductions, detailed examples, corner case identification, rephrased explanations and debugging assistance. Importantly, the framework also highlights the risks associated with over-dependence on GenAI and aims to intrinsically motivate students towards balanced usage. The approach is based on the idea that simply warning students about potential failures of GenAI may be perceived as instructional shortcomings rather than genuine limitations of the tool. Furthermore, AI-Lab offers strategies for formulating prompts that elicit high-quality responses from GenAI. Educators can use this framework to explore students' perceptions of GenAI's role in their learning experience. In terms of specific activities within AI-Lab, one activity focuses on familiarizing students with the chosen GenAI tool by creating an account and engaging with its functionality through illustrative prompts provided by instructors. Students are encouraged to transition from broad queries resembling human conversation towards more domain-specific questions related to computer science topics covered in their coursework. Another activity involves requesting explanations from GenAI regarding upcoming lab session topics using a prompt structure that allows for enhanced and tailored outcomes. Overall, the AI-Lab framework aims to guide students in effectively utilizing GenAI while preserving their core skill development during their foundational academic years. It provides a structured approach to incorporating GenAI into programming courses offering support and opportunities for learning reinforcement while mitigating the risks of over-dependence on these tools.
Created on 13 Dec. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.