Innovating Computer Programming Pedagogy: The AI-Lab Framework for Generative AI Adoption
AI-generated Key Points
- The rise of Generative AI (GenAI) has raised concerns about its impact on core skills development in Computer Science students
- Nearly half of the students use GenAI for their homework assignments
- The "Junior-Year Wall" phenomenon is a concern, where students struggle in advanced courses due to excessive reliance on GenAI
- Researchers propose a pedagogical framework called "AI-Lab" to guide students in effectively leveraging GenAI within programming courses
- AI-Lab emphasizes the benefits and potential of GenAI as a teaching instrument and encourages identifying and rectifying errors made by GenAI to enhance learning
- AI-Lab provides tailored support using GenAI, such as topic introductions, detailed examples, corner case identification, rephrased explanations, and debugging assistance
- The framework highlights the risks associated with over-dependence on GenAI and aims to intrinsically motivate students towards balanced usage
- AI-Lab offers strategies for formulating prompts that elicit high-quality responses from GenAI
- Specific activities within AI-Lab include familiarizing students with the chosen GenAI tool and requesting explanations from GenAI regarding upcoming lab session topics
- The AI-Lab framework aims to guide students in effectively utilizing GenAI while preserving their core skill development during their foundational academic years.
Authors: Ethan Dickey, Andres Bejarano, Chirayu Garg
Abstract: Over the last year, the ascent of Generative AI (GenAI) has raised concerns about its impact on core skill development, such as problem-solving and algorithmic thinking, in Computer Science students. Preliminary anonymous surveys show that at least 48.5% of our students use GenAI for homework. With the proliferation of these tools, the academic community must contemplate the appropriate role of these tools in education. Neglecting this might culminate in a phenomenon we term the "Junior-Year Wall," where students struggle in advanced courses due to prior over-dependence on GenAI. Instead of discouraging GenAI use, which may unintentionally foster covert usage, our research seeks to answer: "How can educators guide students' interactions with GenAI to preserve core skill development during their foundational academic years?" We introduce "AI-Lab," a pedagogical framework for guiding students in effectively leveraging GenAI within core collegiate programming courses. This framework accentuates GenAI's benefits and potential as a pedagogical instrument. By identifying and rectifying GenAI's errors, students enrich their learning process. Moreover, AI-Lab presents opportunities to use GenAI for tailored support such as topic introductions, detailed examples, corner case identification, rephrased explanations, and debugging assistance. Importantly, the framework highlights the risks of GenAI over-dependence, aiming to intrinsically motivate students towards balanced usage. This approach is premised on the idea that mere warnings of GenAI's potential failures may be misconstrued as instructional shortcomings rather than genuine tool limitations. Additionally, AI-Lab offers strategies for formulating prompts to elicit high-quality GenAI responses. For educators, AI-Lab provides mechanisms to explore students' perceptions of GenAI's role in their learning experience.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.