Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2308.11696v1

The increasing versatility of language models (LMs) has led to the development of comprehensive benchmarks that assess a wide range of capabilities. However, these benchmarks come with significant computational costs, often requiring thousands of GPU hours per model. Despite this, there has been little discussion in the literature about the efficiency aspect of evaluating LMs. In this study, the authors address the problem of efficient benchmarking by intelligently reducing the computation costs without compromising reliability. They use the HELM benchmark as a test case to investigate how different design choices affect the tradeoff between computation and reliability. To evaluate the reliability of these decisions, they propose a new measure called Decision Impact on Reliability (DIoR). The authors find that even small changes in benchmark design can have a significant impact on ranking. For example, removing a low-ranked model from the benchmark can change its current leader on HELM. They also observe that only a handful of examples are needed to obtain an accurate benchmark ranking. On the other hand, slight variations in HELM scenarios can lead to widely varying rankings. Based on their findings, the authors provide concrete recommendations for more efficient benchmark design and utilization practices. These recommendations can lead to dramatic cost savings while minimizing loss of benchmark reliability, often reducing computation by up to 100x or more. Overall, this study highlights the importance of considering efficiency in LM evaluation benchmarks and provides valuable insights into how different design choices can impact computation-reliability tradeoffs. The proposed recommendations offer practical solutions for researchers and practitioners looking to optimize their benchmarking processes.

• - Increasing versatility of language models (LMs) has led to comprehensive benchmarks
• - Benchmarks have significant computational costs, requiring thousands of GPU hours per model
• - Little discussion in literature about efficiency aspect of evaluating LMs
• - Authors address problem by reducing computation costs without compromising reliability
• - Use HELM benchmark as test case to investigate design choices' impact on computation and reliability tradeoff
• - Introduce new measure called Decision Impact on Reliability (DIoR) to evaluate reliability of design choices
• - Small changes in benchmark design can have significant impact on ranking
• - Only a handful of examples needed for accurate benchmark ranking
• - Slight variations in HELM scenarios can lead to widely varying rankings
• - Authors provide concrete recommendations for more efficient benchmark design and utilization practices
• - Recommendations can lead to dramatic cost savings while minimizing loss of benchmark reliability, reducing computation by up to 100x or more
• - Study highlights importance of considering efficiency in LM evaluation benchmarks and offers practical solutions for optimizing benchmarking processes.

Key Points1. Language models have become more versatile, which means they can do many different things. 2. Testing these models is expensive and requires a lot of computer power. 3. Not many people talk about how to make testing more efficient. 4. The authors found a way to make testing faster without making it less reliable. 5. They used a specific test as an example to show how different choices can affect the results. Definitions- Versatility: The ability to do many different things or be used in many different ways. - Benchmarks: Tests or standards used to measure the performance or quality of something. - Computation: The process of doing calculations or solving problems using computers. - Reliability: How trustworthy or accurate something is. - Tradeoff: When you have to give up one thing in order to get another thing that you want more. - Efficiency: Doing something quickly and with as little waste as possible.

Efficient Benchmarking of Language Models: A Study

Language models (LMs) are increasingly versatile, allowing for the development of comprehensive benchmarks to assess a wide range of capabilities. However, these benchmarks come with significant computational costs, often requiring thousands of GPU hours per model. Despite this, there has been little discussion in the literature about the efficiency aspect of evaluating LMs. In this study, the authors address this problem by intelligently reducing computation costs without compromising reliability.

The HELM Benchmark

The authors use the HELM benchmark as a test case to investigate how different design choices affect the tradeoff between computation and reliability. To evaluate the reliability of these decisions, they propose a new measure called Decision Impact on Reliability (DIoR). The authors find that even small changes in benchmark design can have a significant impact on ranking. For example, removing a low-ranked model from the benchmark can change its current leader on HELM. They also observe that only a handful of examples are needed to obtain an accurate benchmark ranking. On the other hand, slight variations in HELM scenarios can lead to widely varying rankings.

Recommendations for Efficient Benchmark Design and Utilization Practices

Based on their findings, the authors provide concrete recommendations for more efficient benchmark design and utilization practices. These recommendations can lead to dramatic cost savings while minimizing loss of benchmark reliability; often reducing computation by up to 100x or more.

Conclusion

Overall, this study highlights the importance of considering efficiency in LM evaluation benchmarks and provides valuable insights into how different design choices can impact computation-reliability tradeoffs. The proposed recommendations offer practical solutions for researchers and practitioners looking to optimize their benchmarking processes