UNCOVER: A NIRSpec Identification of a Broad Line AGN at z = 8.50
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Deep observations with the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) have found red point-like sources
- These sources could bridge the gap between supermassive black hole seeds and observed quasars
- A JWST/NIRSpec spectrum from the Cycle 1 UNCOVER Treasury survey reveals a massive accreting black hole at a redshift of $z=8.50$
- The spectrum shows a clear broad-line component, specifically inferred from the H$\beta$ line, indicating an active galactic nucleus (AGN)
- High ionization levels inferred from emission lines and point-source morphology further support the AGN nature of this object
- Black hole mass is calculated to be log$_{10}(M_{\rm BH}/M_\odot)=8.17\pm0.42$, with a bolometric luminosity of $L_{\rm bol}\sim6.6\times10^{45}$ erg s$^{-1}$
- The object is accreting at approximately 40% of its Eddington limit
- Modeling suggests an upper limit on stellar mass of log$_{10}(M_{\rm *}/M_\odot)<8.7$, implying a black hole to host mass ratio exceeding 30%
- This discovery aligns with recent AGN studies using JWST and suggests that many supermassive black holes may have originated from massive seeds or experienced super-Eddington accretion rates in the early universe
- Future observations using JWST's NIRSpec instrument will enable further investigations into coevolution between galaxies and black holes in the early universe
Authors: Vasily Kokorev, Seiji Fujimoto, Ivo Labbe, Jenny E. Greene, Rachel Bezanson, Pratika Dayal, Erica J. Nelson, Hakim Atek, Gabriel Brammer, Iryna Chemerynska, Sam E. Cutler, Robert Feldmann, Yoshinobu Fudamoto, Lukas J. Furtak, Andy D. Goulding, Anna de Graaff, Joel Leja, Danilo Marchesini, Tim B. Miller, Themiya Nanayakkara, Pascal Oesch, Richard Pan, Sedona H. Price, David J. Setton, Renske Smit, Mauro Stefanon, Bingjie Wang, John R. Weaver, Katherine E. Whitaker, Christina C. Williams, Adi Zitrin
Abstract: Deep observations with JWST have revealed an emerging population of red point-like sources that could provide a link between the postulated supermassive black hole seeds and observed quasars. In this work we present a JWST/NIRSpec spectrum from the JWST Cycle 1 UNCOVER Treasury survey, of a massive accreting black hole at $z=8.50$, displaying a clear broad-line component as inferred from the H$\beta$ line with FWHM = $3439\pm413$ km s$^{-1}$, typical of the broad line region of an active galactic nucleus (AGN). The AGN nature of this object is further supported by high ionization, as inferred from emission lines, and a point-source morphology. We compute the black hole mass of log$_{10}(M_{\rm BH}/M_\odot)=8.17\pm0.42$, and a bolometric luminosity of $L_{\rm bol}\sim6.6\times10^{45}$ erg s$^{-1}$. These values imply that our object is accreting at $\sim 40\%$ of the Eddington limit. Detailed modeling of the spectral energy distribution in the optical and near-infrared, together with constraints from ALMA, indicate an upper limit on the stellar mass of log$_{10}(M_{\rm *}/M_\odot)<8.7$, which would lead to an unprecedented ratio of black hole to host mass of at least $\sim 30 \%$. This is orders of magnitude higher compared to the local QSOs, but is consistent with recent AGN studies at high redshift with JWST. This finding suggests that a non-negligible fraction of supermassive black holes either started out from massive seeds and/or grew at a super-Eddington rate at high redshift. Given the predicted number densities of high-$z$ faint AGN, future NIRSpec observations of larger samples will allow us to further investigate the galaxy-black hole co-evolution in the early Universe.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.