Benchmarking highly entangled states on a 60-atom analog quantum simulator

AI-generated keywords: Quantum Computing Entanglement Fidelity Benchmarking Analog Quantum Devices High Entanglement Regime

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • In the realm of quantum computing, classical computers are forced to make approximations to accurately represent highly entangled quantum states.
  • Challenges exist in comparing fidelity between quantum and classical systems, especially for analog quantum devices.
  • A study by Adam L. Shaw, Zhuo Chen, Joonhee Choi, Daniel K. Mark, Pascal Scholl, Ran Finkelstein, Andreas Elben, Soonwon Choi, and Manuel Endres used a 60-atom analog Rydberg quantum simulator to push boundaries into a high entanglement entropy regime where exact classical simulation is impractical.
  • The team developed an estimator for experimental mixed-state entanglement through extrapolation from comparisons against various approximate classical algorithms with varying entanglement limits.
  • The experiment proved competitive with state-of-the-art digital quantum devices engaged in random circuit evolution.
  • Only one newly introduced algorithm was able to keep pace with the experiment on the classical hardware utilized by the team.
  • These results open new avenues for evaluating the performance of analog and digital quantum devices operating beyond-classically-exact regimes.
  • The study highlights the evolving disparity between quantum and classical systems while showcasing the potential of analog quantum simulators in advancing entanglement studies.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Adam L. Shaw, Zhuo Chen, Joonhee Choi, Daniel K. Mark, Pascal Scholl, Ran Finkelstein, Andreas Elben, Soonwon Choi, Manuel Endres

arXiv: 2308.07914v1 - DOI (quant-ph)
ALS, ZC, and JC contributed equally

Abstract: Quantum systems have entered a competitive regime where classical computers must make approximations to represent highly entangled quantum states. However, in this beyond-classically-exact regime, fidelity comparisons between quantum and classical systems have so far been limited to digital quantum devices, and it remains unsolved how to estimate the actual entanglement content of experiments. Here we perform fidelity benchmarking and mixed-state entanglement estimation with a 60-atom analog Rydberg quantum simulator, reaching a high entanglement entropy regime where exact classical simulation becomes impractical. Our benchmarking protocol involves extrapolation from comparisons against many approximate classical algorithms with varying entanglement limits. We then develop and demonstrate an estimator of the experimental mixed-state entanglement, finding our experiment is competitive with state-of-the-art digital quantum devices performing random circuit evolution. Finally, we compare the experimental fidelity against that achieved by various approximate classical algorithms, and find that only one, which we introduce here, is able to keep pace with the experiment on the classical hardware we employ. Our results enable a new paradigm for evaluating the performance of both analog and digital quantum devices in the beyond-classically-exact regime, and highlight the evolving divide between quantum and classical systems.

Submitted to arXiv on 15 Aug. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2308.07914v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the realm of quantum computing, a competitive landscape has emerged where classical computers are forced to make approximations in order to accurately represent highly entangled quantum states. This transition into a beyond-classically-exact regime has posed challenges in comparing fidelity between quantum and classical systems, particularly when it comes to analog quantum devices. The ability to estimate the actual entanglement content of experiments has remained a puzzle yet to be solved. In a groundbreaking study, Adam L. Shaw, Zhuo Chen, Joonhee Choi, Daniel K. Mark, Pascal Scholl, Ran Finkelstein, Andreas Elben, Soonwon Choi, and Manuel Endres have conducted and using a 60-atom analog Rydberg quantum simulator. Their research pushes the boundaries into a high entanglement entropy regime where exact classical simulation becomes impractical. The employed by the team involves extrapolation from comparisons against numerous approximate classical algorithms with varying entanglement limits. Through this methodical approach, they were able to develop and demonstrate an estimator for experimental mixed-state entanglement. Surprisingly, their experiment proved to be competitive with state-of-the-art digital quantum devices engaged in random circuit evolution. Furthermore, the researchers compared the experimental fidelity achieved in their study against various approximate classical algorithms. Intriguingly, only one newly introduced algorithm was able to keep pace with the experiment on the classical hardware utilized by the team. These groundbreaking results open up new avenues for evaluating the performance of both analog and digital quantum devices operating in the beyond-classically-exact regime. They shed light on the evolving disparity between quantum and classical systems while showcasing the potential of analog quantum simulators in pushing the boundaries of entanglement studies. The collaborative effort of these researchers marks a significant advancement in our understanding of highly entangled states and sets a new standard for future research in this field.
Created on 18 Dec. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.