A Large Language Model Enhanced Conversational Recommender System

AI-generated keywords: Conversational recommender systems

AI-generated Key Points

Conversational Recommender Systems (CRSs) recommend high-quality items to users through a dialogue interface
Large Language Models (LLMs) have remarkable reasoning and generation capabilities, enhancing CRSs
LLM-based CRS called LLMCRS addresses challenges by leveraging LLM reasoning ability and expert models
LLMCRS system stages: sub-task detection, model matching, sub-task execution, response generation
Fine-tuning LLM using reinforcement learning from CRS performance feedback (RLPF) improves recommendation accuracy
Experimental results show that LLMCRS with RLPF outperforms existing methods
Evaluation measures include HIT@k, MRR@k, NDCG@k for recommendation performance assessment; BLEU for response similarity evaluation; Distinct for response diversity measurement
Integration of LLM capabilities in conversational recommender systems improves recommendation accuracy and enhances user interactions

Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Yue Feng, Shuchang Liu, Zhenghai Xue, Qingpeng Cai, Lantao Hu, Peng Jiang, Kun Gai, Fei Sun

arXiv: 2308.06212v1 - DOI (cs.IR)

License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Abstract: Conversational recommender systems (CRSs) aim to recommend high-quality items to users through a dialogue interface. It usually contains multiple sub-tasks, such as user preference elicitation, recommendation, explanation, and item information search. To develop effective CRSs, there are some challenges: 1) how to properly manage sub-tasks; 2) how to effectively solve different sub-tasks; and 3) how to correctly generate responses that interact with users. Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have exhibited an unprecedented ability to reason and generate, presenting a new opportunity to develop more powerful CRSs. In this work, we propose a new LLM-based CRS, referred to as LLMCRS, to address the above challenges. For sub-task management, we leverage the reasoning ability of LLM to effectively manage sub-task. For sub-task solving, we collaborate LLM with expert models of different sub-tasks to achieve the enhanced performance. For response generation, we utilize the generation ability of LLM as a language interface to better interact with users. Specifically, LLMCRS divides the workflow into four stages: sub-task detection, model matching, sub-task execution, and response generation. LLMCRS also designs schema-based instruction, demonstration-based instruction, dynamic sub-task and model matching, and summary-based generation to instruct LLM to generate desired results in the workflow. Finally, to adapt LLM to conversational recommendations, we also propose to fine-tune LLM with reinforcement learning from CRSs performance feedback, referred to as RLPF. Experimental results on benchmark datasets show that LLMCRS with RLPF outperforms the existing methods.

Submitted to arXiv on 11 Aug. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2308.06212v1

Comprehensive Summary
Key points
Layman's Summary
Blog article

, , , , Conversational Recommender Systems (CRSs) are designed to recommend high-quality items to users through a dialogue interface, involving tasks such as user preference elicitation, recommendation, explanation, and item information search. Developing effective CRSs poses challenges in managing sub-tasks, solving them effectively, and generating responses that engage users. Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable reasoning and generation capabilities, offering new opportunities for enhancing CRSs. In this study, a novel LLM-based CRS called LLMCRS is proposed to address these challenges. are designed to recommend high-quality items to users through a dialogue interface. LLMCRS leverages the reasoning ability of LLM for sub-task management and collaborates with expert models for enhanced performance in solving different sub-tasks. The system is divided into four stages: sub-task detection, model matching, sub-task execution, and response generation. It incorporates schema-based instruction, demonstration-based instruction, dynamic sub-task and model matching, and summary-based generation to guide LLM in generating desired results. To adapt LLM to conversational recommendations, the system is fine-tuned using reinforcement learning from CRS performance feedback (RLPF). Experimental results on benchmark datasets demonstrate that LLMCRS with RLPF outperforms existing methods. have shown remarkable reasoning and generation capabilities. A case study comparing LLMCRS with TG-ReDial on GoRecDial datasets illustrates the system's ability to provide accurate recommendations and generate informative responses based on user preferences. Evaluation measures include ranking-based metrics like HIT@k, MRR@k, NDCG@k for recommendation performance assessment; relevance-based metrics like BLEU for response similarity evaluation; and diversity-based metrics like Distinct for response diversity measurement. Implementation details ensure fair comparisons using the CRSLab toolkit. showcases the potential of integrating LLM capabilities into conversational recommender systems to improve recommendation accuracy and enhance user interactions through more informative responses. Overall, LLMCRS demonstrates the potential of in improving conversational recommender systems. It offers a novel approach to managing sub-tasks, solving them effectively, and generating engaging responses that cater to user preferences. By leveraging the capabilities of , LLMCRS presents new opportunities for enhancing CRSs and providing accurate recommendations based on user preferences. Through its innovative design and implementation, LLMCRS showcases the importance of considering user interactions in developing effective conversational recommender systems.

- Conversational Recommender Systems (CRSs) recommend high-quality items to users through a dialogue interface
- Large Language Models (LLMs) have remarkable reasoning and generation capabilities, enhancing CRSs
- LLM-based CRS called LLMCRS addresses challenges by leveraging LLM reasoning ability and expert models
- LLMCRS system stages: sub-task detection, model matching, sub-task execution, response generation
- Fine-tuning LLM using reinforcement learning from CRS performance feedback (RLPF) improves recommendation accuracy
- Experimental results show that LLMCRS with RLPF outperforms existing methods
- Evaluation measures include HIT@k, MRR@k, NDCG@k for recommendation performance assessment; BLEU for response similarity evaluation; Distinct for response diversity measurement
- Integration of LLM capabilities in conversational recommender systems improves recommendation accuracy and enhances user interactions

Summary1. Conversational Recommender Systems (CRSs) help suggest good things to people by talking with them. 2. Large Language Models (LLMs) are smart tools that can think and create new things, making CRSs better. 3. LLM-based CRS called LLMCRS solves problems by using the smart thinking of LLM and expert models. 4. The steps in the LLMCRS system include finding tasks, matching models, doing tasks, and making responses. 5. Making LLM smarter with feedback from how well CRS works improves suggestions. Definitions- Conversational Recommender Systems (CRSs): Tools that recommend good items to users through talking. - Large Language Models (LLMs): Smart tools with great thinking and creating abilities. - Dialogue interface: A way for computers to talk with people. - Reasoning ability: Thinking skills to solve problems or make decisions effectively. - Fine-tuning: Adjusting something slightly to make it work better or fit a specific purpose. - Reinforcement learning: Teaching a computer through rewards or punishments based on its actions. - Performance feedback: Information about how well something is working or performing. - Experimental results: Findings from tests or trials done in a controlled setting.

Introduction

Conversational Recommender Systems (CRSs) have gained significant attention in recent years due to their ability to recommend high-quality items to users through a dialogue interface. These systems involve tasks such as user preference elicitation, recommendation, explanation, and item information search. However, developing effective CRSs poses challenges in managing sub-tasks, solving them effectively, and generating responses that engage users. In this research paper titled "LLMCRS: Integrating Large Language Models into Conversational Recommender Systems", the authors propose a novel LLM-based CRS to address these challenges. The system leverages the reasoning ability of Large Language Models (LLMs) for sub-task management and collaborates with expert models for enhanced performance in solving different sub-tasks.

Background

Large Language Models have shown remarkable capabilities in reasoning and generation tasks. They are pre-trained on large amounts of text data and can generate coherent sentences based on given prompts or instructions. This makes them suitable for conversational recommender systems where they can understand user preferences and generate relevant recommendations. Existing methods for conversational recommendation often rely on rule-based approaches or collaborative filtering techniques which have limitations in handling complex user interactions and providing accurate recommendations. Therefore, there is a need for more advanced techniques that can improve the performance of CRSs.

The Proposed System: LLMCRS

The proposed system is divided into four stages: sub-task detection, model matching, sub-task execution, and response generation. It incorporates various techniques such as schema-based instruction, demonstration-based instruction, dynamic sub-task and model matching, and summary-based generation to guide LLM in generating desired results. To adapt LLM to conversational recommendations, the system is fine-tuned using reinforcement learning from CRS performance feedback (RLPF). This allows the system to learn from its own performance and improve over time.

Evaluation Measures

To evaluate the performance of LLMCRS, the authors use various metrics including ranking-based metrics like HIT@k, MRR@k, NDCG@k for recommendation performance assessment; relevance-based metrics like BLEU for response similarity evaluation; and diversity-based metrics like Distinct for response diversity measurement. These measures ensure fair comparisons using the CRSLab toolkit.

Experimental Results

The experimental results on benchmark datasets demonstrate that LLMCRS with RLPF outperforms existing methods. A case study comparing LLMCRS with TG-ReDial on GoRecDial datasets illustrates the system's ability to provide accurate recommendations and generate informative responses based on user preferences.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this research paper presents a novel approach to integrating Large Language Models into conversational recommender systems. The proposed system, LLMCRS, showcases the potential of leveraging LLM capabilities in improving CRSs by managing sub-tasks effectively and generating engaging responses based on user preferences. Through its innovative design and implementation, LLMCRS highlights the importance of considering user interactions in developing effective conversational recommender systems.

Created on 12 Sep. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

75.3%

Leveraging Large Language Models in Conversational Recommender Systems

cs.IR

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.