Augmented Negative Sampling for Collaborative Filtering
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Importance of negative sampling in collaborative filtering for implicit-feedback-based systems
- Negative samples guide supervised learning by providing contrasting signals from unlabeled data
- Current state-of-the-art approach involves using hard negative samples to create a better decision boundary
- Existing methods have limitations in selecting negative samples, leading to ineffective contrast with positive samples
- Authors confirm limitations through experiments and identify two specific limitations: ambiguous trap and information discrimination
- Proposed solution is the use of augmented negative samples
- Augmented negative sampling disentangles hard and easy factors of negative items and generates new candidate negative samples by augmenting only the easy factors in a regulated manner
- An advanced negative sampling strategy is designed to identify the final augmented negative samples, considering both the score function used in existing methods and a new metric called augmentation gain
- Extensive experiments on real-world datasets demonstrate superior performance compared to state-of-the-art baselines
Authors: Yuhan Zhao, Rui Chen, Riwei Lai, Qilong Han, Hongtao Song, Li Chen
Abstract: Negative sampling is essential for implicit-feedback-based collaborative filtering, which is used to constitute negative signals from massive unlabeled data to guide supervised learning. The state-of-the-art idea is to utilize hard negative samples that carry more useful information to form a better decision boundary. To balance efficiency and effectiveness, the vast majority of existing methods follow the two-pass approach, in which the first pass samples a fixed number of unobserved items by a simple static distribution and then the second pass selects the final negative items using a more sophisticated negative sampling strategy. However, selecting negative samples from the original items is inherently restricted, and thus may not be able to contrast positive samples well. In this paper, we confirm this observation via experiments and introduce two limitations of existing solutions: ambiguous trap and information discrimination. Our response to such limitations is to introduce augmented negative samples. This direction renders a substantial technical challenge because constructing unconstrained negative samples may introduce excessive noise that distorts the decision boundary. To this end, we introduce a novel generic augmented negative sampling paradigm and provide a concrete instantiation. First, we disentangle hard and easy factors of negative items. Next, we generate new candidate negative samples by augmenting only the easy factors in a regulated manner: the direction and magnitude of the augmentation are carefully calibrated. Finally, we design an advanced negative sampling strategy to identify the final augmented negative samples, which considers not only the score function used in existing methods but also a new metric called augmentation gain. Extensive experiments on real-world datasets demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.