In their paper titled "Mathematical Artifacts Have Politics: The Journey from Examples to Embedded Ethics," Dennis Müller and Maurice Chiodo extend Langdon Winner's concept that artifacts have politics into the realm of mathematics. They begin by providing a list of examples demonstrating the existence of mathematical artifacts with political implications. Building on this, they present an argument asserting that all mathematical artifacts inherently possess political dimensions. The authors conclude by discussing the implications of recognizing the political nature of mathematical artifacts for embedding ethics into mathematical curricula. have long been recognized as powerful tools in shaping our society and culture. In their thought-provoking paper, and take this concept one step further by exploring how these artifacts also hold . Their work delves into various levels of ethical engagement within mathematics, highlighting the importance of critical thinking and integration of ethics in mathematical education. The authors provide a comprehensive list of examples showcasing how seemingly neutral mathematical concepts can have significant political implications. From problem formulation to abstraction, every aspect of mathematical practice is influenced by . One specific example discussed is the question of what is considered "natural" about natural numbers (N) within the context of Peano axioms. This prompts readers to consider different cultural perspectives on counting and numerical concepts, emphasizing how notions of naturalness can vary across diverse communities. Through their analysis, Müller and Chiodo assert that all mathematical artifacts possess inherent political dimensions. They argue that it is crucial for mathematicians to recognize this fact and incorporate it into their teaching practices. By doing so, they can design more effective exercises for students that encourage critical thinking about ethical considerations in mathematics. The paper also explores various levels of ethical engagement within mathematics, from simply acknowledging ethics (level 1) to identifying harmful aspects of mathematical practices (level 4). This highlights the need for a deeper understanding and integration of in mathematical education. In conclusion, Müller and Chiodo's work emphasizes the importance of recognizing the political dimensions inherent in and integrating into mathematical curricula. Their insights aim to promote critical reflection among mathematicians and students alike on the ethical implications of their work. By doing so, they hope to foster a more responsible and socially conscious approach to mathematics.
- - Dennis Müller and Maurice Chiodo extend Langdon Winner's concept that artifacts have politics into the realm of mathematics
- - They argue that all mathematical artifacts inherently possess political dimensions
- - The authors discuss the implications of recognizing the political nature of mathematical artifacts for embedding ethics into mathematical curricula
- - Their work delves into various levels of ethical engagement within mathematics, emphasizing critical thinking and integration of ethics in mathematical education
- - Examples showcased how seemingly neutral mathematical concepts can have significant political implications, such as the question of what is considered "natural" about natural numbers (N) within the context of Peano axioms
- - Müller and Chiodo assert that it is crucial for mathematicians to recognize the inherent political dimensions in mathematical artifacts and incorporate this awareness into their teaching practices
- - The paper explores various levels of ethical engagement within mathematics, highlighting the need for a deeper understanding and integration of ethics in mathematical education
- - The importance of recognizing political dimensions in mathematics and integrating ethics into curricula is emphasized to promote critical reflection on ethical implications among mathematicians and students
Summary1. Dennis Müller and Maurice Chiodo say that math things can have politics in them.
2. They think all math things have some political parts.
3. The authors talk about how ethics should be part of learning math.
4. Their work looks at being good and thinking hard when doing math.
5. They show examples of how even simple math ideas can be political.
Definitions- Artifacts: Objects made by people, like tools or machines.
- Politics: How power and decisions affect groups of people.
- Ethical: Doing what is right and fair.
- Curricula: The things students learn in school.
- Mathematicians: People who study and work with numbers and shapes.
Introduction
Mathematics has long been recognized as a powerful tool in shaping our society and culture. From engineering to economics, it plays a crucial role in various fields and influences our daily lives in countless ways. However, what is often overlooked is the fact that mathematical artifacts also hold political implications. In their paper titled "Mathematical Artifacts Have Politics: The Journey from Examples to Embedded Ethics," Dennis Müller and Maurice Chiodo explore this concept by extending Langdon Winner's idea that artifacts have politics into the realm of mathematics.
The Existence of Political Mathematical Artifacts
Müller and Chiodo begin their paper by providing a list of examples demonstrating the existence of mathematical artifacts with political implications. These include algorithms used for facial recognition technology, data collection methods for census surveys, and even simple concepts like counting numbers. Through these examples, they highlight how seemingly neutral mathematical concepts can have significant social and ethical consequences.
One specific example discussed is the question of what is considered "natural" about natural numbers (N) within the context of Peano axioms. This prompts readers to consider different cultural perspectives on counting and numerical concepts, emphasizing how notions of naturalness can vary across diverse communities.
The Argument for Inherent Political Dimensions
Building on these examples, Müller and Chiodo present an argument asserting that all mathematical artifacts inherently possess political dimensions. They argue that every aspect of mathematical practice - from problem formulation to abstraction - is influenced by societal values, biases, and power dynamics.
The authors also discuss how certain assumptions made in mathematics can perpetuate harmful ideologies or reinforce existing inequalities. For instance, using binary gender categories in statistical analysis may exclude non-binary individuals from being accurately represented or accounted for.
Implications for Embedding Ethics into Mathematical Curricula
In light of recognizing the political nature of mathematical artifacts, Müller and Chiodo discuss the implications for embedding ethics into mathematical curricula. They argue that it is crucial for mathematicians to acknowledge and address these political dimensions in their teaching practices.
The paper explores various levels of ethical engagement within mathematics, from simply acknowledging ethics (level 1) to identifying harmful aspects of mathematical practices (level 4). This highlights the need for a deeper understanding and integration of ethics in mathematical education.
Level 1: Acknowledging Ethics
At this level, mathematicians are encouraged to recognize the potential ethical implications of their work. This involves critically reflecting on how their research may impact society and considering alternative perspectives.
Level 2: Identifying Ethical Issues
The next level involves actively seeking out potential ethical issues within mathematical artifacts. This requires a deeper understanding of societal values and power dynamics that may influence mathematical concepts.
Level 3: Evaluating Harmful Aspects
At this level, mathematicians are expected to evaluate the potential harm caused by certain mathematical practices. This includes questioning assumptions made in problem formulation or data collection methods that may perpetuate discrimination or inequality.
Level 4: Addressing Ethical Concerns
The highest level of ethical engagement involves actively addressing identified concerns through changes in practice or curriculum design. By incorporating diverse perspectives and promoting critical thinking about ethical considerations, mathematicians can create more responsible approaches to mathematics.
Conclusion
In conclusion, Müller and Chiodo's paper sheds light on the often overlooked fact that all mathematical artifacts possess inherent political dimensions. Their work emphasizes the importance of recognizing these dimensions and integrating ethics into mathematical curricula at all levels - from basic acknowledgement to active addressing of concerns. By doing so, they hope to promote critical reflection among mathematicians and students alike on the social responsibility associated with their work.