Studying Large Language Model Generalization with Influence Functions

AI-generated keywords: Large Language Models Influence Functions Generalization Properties Machine Learning Models EK-FAC Approximation Method

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Researchers used influence functions to understand generalization properties of large language models (LLMs)
  • Influence functions help identify training examples with significant impact on model behavior
  • EK-FAC approximation method demonstrated similar accuracy to traditional estimators while reducing computation time for IHVP calculations
  • Algorithmic techniques like TF-IDF filtering and query batching were explored to streamline gradient computations for candidate training sequences
  • Study investigated various aspects of LLM generalization patterns, including sparsity of influence patterns, cross-lingual generalization, and role-playing behavior
  • One surprising limitation identified: influences decay close to zero when key phrase order is flipped
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Roger Grosse, Juhan Bae, Cem Anil, Nelson Elhage, Alex Tamkin, Amirhossein Tajdini, Benoit Steiner, Dustin Li, Esin Durmus, Ethan Perez, Evan Hubinger, Kamilė Lukošiūtė, Karina Nguyen, Nicholas Joseph, Sam McCandlish, Jared Kaplan, Samuel R. Bowman

119 pages, 47 figures, 22 tables

Abstract: When trying to gain better visibility into a machine learning model in order to understand and mitigate the associated risks, a potentially valuable source of evidence is: which training examples most contribute to a given behavior? Influence functions aim to answer a counterfactual: how would the model's parameters (and hence its outputs) change if a given sequence were added to the training set? While influence functions have produced insights for small models, they are difficult to scale to large language models (LLMs) due to the difficulty of computing an inverse-Hessian-vector product (IHVP). We use the Eigenvalue-corrected Kronecker-Factored Approximate Curvature (EK-FAC) approximation to scale influence functions up to LLMs with up to 52 billion parameters. In our experiments, EK-FAC achieves similar accuracy to traditional influence function estimators despite the IHVP computation being orders of magnitude faster. We investigate two algorithmic techniques to reduce the cost of computing gradients of candidate training sequences: TF-IDF filtering and query batching. We use influence functions to investigate the generalization patterns of LLMs, including the sparsity of the influence patterns, increasing abstraction with scale, math and programming abilities, cross-lingual generalization, and role-playing behavior. Despite many apparently sophisticated forms of generalization, we identify a surprising limitation: influences decay to near-zero when the order of key phrases is flipped. Overall, influence functions give us a powerful new tool for studying the generalization properties of LLMs.

Submitted to arXiv on 07 Aug. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2308.03296v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the study titled "Studying Large Language Model Generalization with Influence Functions," researchers Roger Grosse, Juhan Bae, Cem Anil, Nelson Elhage, Alex Tamkin, Amirhossein Tajdini, Benoit Steiner, Dustin Li, Esin Durmus, Ethan Perez, Evan Hubinger, Kamilė Lukošiūtė,Karina Nguyen,Nicholas Joseph,Sam McCandlish,Jared Kaplan,and Samuel R. Bowman delve into the use of influence functions to gain insight into the generalization properties of large language models (LLMs). The research focuses on understanding and mitigating risks associated with machine learning models by identifying which training examples have the most significant impact on a model's behavior. The researchers introduce influence functions as a tool to determine how a model's parameters and outputs would change if a specific sequence were added to the training set. Through experiments using EK-FAC approximation method,the team demonstrates that this approach achieves similar accuracy to traditional influence function estimators while significantly reducing computation time for IHVP calculations. They also explore algorithmic techniques such as TF-IDF filtering and query batching to streamline the process of computing gradients for candidate training sequences. The study investigates various aspects of LLM generalization patterns using influence functions including sparsity of influence patterns, abstraction levels with scale increase in math and programming abilities cross-lingual generalization and role-playing behavior. Despite observing sophisticated forms of generalization in LLMs through these analyses, one surprising limitation is identified: influences decay close to zero when key phrase order is flipped. Overall,this research showcases how influence functions serve as a powerful tool for studying and understanding the generalization properties of large language models like never before.With 119 pages containing 47 figures and 22 tables in their comprehensive analysis published on arXiv.org under ID 2308.03296v1., these findings provide valuable insights for advancing our knowledge of machine learning model behaviors.
Created on 27 Mar. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.