Tracing the Total Stellar Mass and Star Formation of High-Redshift Protoclusters

AI-generated keywords: Protoclusters Galaxy Evolution Stacking Analysis Star Formation Stellar Mass

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Protoclusters are the progenitors of present-day galaxy clusters
  • Understanding how typical galaxies grow within protoclusters is uncertain
  • Stacking analysis of 211 protoclusters selected as Planck cold sources at redshifts between 2 and 4 was performed
  • WISE and Herschel/SPIRE images were stacked to measure angular size and spectral energy distribution
  • Total stellar mass and star formation within protoclusters were estimated, including contributions from faint undetected members
  • Fluxes of protoclusters selected as Planck cold sources can be contaminated by line-of-sight interlopers
  • On average, protoclusters exhibit twice as much star formation and four times more stellar mass compared to individually-detected galaxies in spectroscopically-confirmed protoclusters
  • A significant portion of the total flux observed within protoclusters comes from galaxies with luminosities below the detection limit of SPIRE
  • Protoclusters have a half-light radius of 2.8 arcminutes (corresponding to a physical scale of 4.2-5.8 co-moving megaparsecs), consistent with simulations
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Roxana Popescu, Alexandra Pope, Kyoung-Soo Lee, Stacey Alberts, Yi-Kuan Chiang, Sowon Lee, Mark Brodwin, Jed McKinney, Vandana Ramakrishnan

arXiv: 2308.00745v1 - DOI (astro-ph.GA)
Accepted for publication in ApJ

Abstract: As the progenitors of present-day galaxy clusters, protoclusters are excellent laboratories to study galaxy evolution. Since existing observations of protoclusters are limited to the detected constituent galaxies at UV and/or infrared wavelengths, the details of how typical galaxies grow in these young, pre-virialized structures remain uncertain. We measure the total stellar mass and star formation within protoclusters, including the contribution from faint undetected members by performing a stacking analysis of 211 $z=2-4$ protoclusters selected as Planck cold sources. We stack WISE and Herschel/SPIRE images to measure the angular size and the spectral energy distribution of the integrated light from the protoclusters. The fluxes of protoclusters selected as Planck cold sources can be contaminated by line of sight interlopers. Using the WebSky simulation, we estimate that a single protocluster contributes $33\pm15$% of the flux of a Planck cold source on average. After this correction, we obtain a total star formation rate of $7.3\pm3.2 \times 10^3\ M_{\odot} {\rm yr}^{-1}$ and a total stellar mass of $4.9\pm 2.2\times 10^{12}\ M_{\odot}$. Our results indicate that protoclusters have, on average, 2x more star formation and 4x more stellar mass than the total contribution from individually-detected galaxies in spectroscopically-confirmed protoclusters. This suggests that much of the total flux within $z=2-4$ protoclusters comes from galaxies with luminosities lower than the detection limit of SPIRE ($L_{IR} < 3 \times 10^{12} L_{\odot}$). Lastly, we find that protoclusters subtend a half-light radius of 2.8' (4.2-5.8 cMpc) which is consistent with simulations.

Submitted to arXiv on 01 Aug. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2308.00745v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

This study focuses on protoclusters, which are the progenitors of present-day galaxy clusters. Protoclusters provide valuable insights into galaxy evolution, but our understanding of how typical galaxies grow within these young structures is still uncertain. Previous observations of protoclusters have been limited to detected constituent galaxies at UV and/or infrared wavelengths. To address this knowledge gap, the authors perform a stacking analysis of 211 protoclusters selected as Planck cold sources at redshifts between 2 and 4. By stacking WISE and Herschel/SPIRE images, they measure the angular size and spectral energy distribution of the integrated light from the protoclusters. This approach allows them to estimate the total stellar mass and star formation within these structures, including contributions from faint undetected members. However, it is important to note that the fluxes of protoclusters selected as Planck cold sources can be contaminated by line-of-sight interlopers. To account for this contamination, the authors use the WebSky simulation to estimate that a single protocluster contributes an average of 33±15% of the flux observed from a Planck cold source after correcting for contamination. The authors find a total star formation rate of (7.3±3.2) × 10^3 solar masses per year and a total stellar mass of (4.9±2.2) × 10^12 solar masses within the studied protoclusters. These results indicate that on average protoclusters exhibit twice as much star formation and four times more stellar mass compared to individually-detected galaxies in spectroscopically-confirmed protoclusters; suggesting that a significant portion of the total flux observed within protoclusters at redshifts between 2 and 4 comes from galaxies with luminosities below the detection limit of SPIRE (with infrared luminosities lower than 3 × 10^12 solar luminosities). Lastly, the authors find that protoclusters have a half-light radius of 2.8 arcminutes (corresponding to a physical scale of 4.2-5.8 co-moving megaparsecs), which is consistent with simulations.
Created on 05 Aug. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.