The formation pathways of compact elliptical galaxies
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Compact elliptical (cE) galaxies are challenging to study
- Isolated cEs and host-associated cEs have different formation pathways
- Link between these pathways not established, contributions in cosmological context unknown
- Study combines data from SAMI galaxy survey and IllustrisTNG cosmological simulation
- Spatially-resolved observational sample of cEs analyzed to understand their formation
- Observed differences between isolated and host-associated cEs: redder, smaller, older for those near a host galaxy
- Two main formation pathways identified: stripping of a spiral galaxy by larger host (32%), gradual build-up of stellar mass in isolated environments (68%)
- All isolated cEs formed via in-situ formation, 77% of host-associated cEs formed through tidal stripping
- Differences between isolated and host-associated cEs can be explained by dominance of different formation pathways in each environment
- Study provides insights into complex processes involved in the creation of compact elliptical galaxies.
Authors: Simon Deeley, Michael Drinkwater, Sarah Sweet, Kenji Bekki, Warrick Couch, Duncan Forbes
Abstract: Compact elliptical (cE) galaxies remain an elusively difficult galaxy class to study. Recent observations have suggested that isolated and host-associated cEs have different formation pathways, while simulation studies have also shown different pathways can lead to a cE galaxy. However a solid link has not been established, and the relative contributions of each pathway in a cosmological context remains unknown. Here we combine a spatially-resolved observational sample of cEs taken from the SAMI galaxy survey with a matched sample of galaxies within the IllustrisTNG cosmological simulation to establish an overall picture of how these galaxies form. The observed cEs located near a host galaxy appear redder, smaller and older than isolated cEs, supporting previous evidence for multiple formation pathways. Tracing the simulated cEs back through time, we find two main formation pathways; 32 $\pm$ 5 percent formed via the stripping of a spiral galaxy by a larger host galaxy, while 68 $\pm$ 4 percent formed through a gradual build-up of stellar mass in isolated environments. We confirm that cEs in different environments do indeed form via different pathways, with all isolated cEs in our sample having formed via in-situ formation (i.e. none were ejected from a previous host), and 77 $\pm$ 6 percent of host-associated cEs having formed via tidal stripping. Separating them by their formation pathway, we are able to reproduce the observed differences between isolated and host-associated cEs, showing that these differences can be fully explained by the different formation pathways dominating in each environment.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.