UV-Bright Star-Forming Clumps and Their Host Galaxies in UVCANDELS at 0.5 $\leq$ z $\leq$ 1

AI-generated keywords: Giant star-forming clumps

AI-generated Key Points

  • Giant star-forming clumps are significant in star-forming galaxies and provide insights into galaxy formation and evolution.
  • Uncertainty exists regarding the demographics of these clumps and their host galaxies.
  • The study uses images from UVCANDELS taken by HST/WFC3 to detect and analyze giant star-forming clumps at redshifts ranging from 0.5 to 1.
  • The authors construct a clump sample with higher luminosity than local HII regions.
  • Approximately 35% of low-mass galaxies contain at least one off-center clump, decreasing to 22% for intermediate and high-mass galaxies.
  • Clumpy SFGs tend to have higher star formation rates (SFRs) and bluer colors for low- and intermediate-mass galaxies, while high mass clumpy SFGs tend to be larger in size but have similar density profiles as non-clumpy SFGs.
  • More luminous star-forming regions are found in more luminous, smaller-sized, and/or higher specific star formation rate galaxies.
  • The study provides insights into the demographics of giant star-forming clumps at intermediate redshifts and highlights differences between clumpy and non-clumpy SFGs of different mass ranges.
  • Further research is needed to understand the underlying mechanisms driving these differences.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Alec Martin (Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA), Yicheng Guo (Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA), Xin Wang (School of Astronomy and Space Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences), Anton M. Koekemoer (Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA), Marc Rafelski (Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA), Harry I. Teplitz (IPAC, Caltech, Pasadena, CA, USA), Rogier A. Windhorst (School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA), Anahita Alavi (IPAC, Caltech, Pasadena, CA, USA), Norman A. Grogin (Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA), Laura Prichard (Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA), Ben Sunnquist (Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA), Daniel Ceverino (Departamento de Fisica Teorica, Modulo 8, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain), Nima Chartab (The Observatories of the Carnegie Institution for Science, Pasadena, CA, USA), Christopher J. Conselice (Jodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK), Y. Sophia Dai (Chinese Academy of Sciences South America Center for Astronomy), Avishai Dekel (Racah Institute of Physics, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel), Johnathan P. Gardner (Astrophysics Science Division, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA), Eric Gawiser (Department of Physics and Astronomy Rutgers University Piscataway, NJ, USA), Nimish P. Hathi (Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA), Matthew J. Hayes (Stockholm University, Department of Astronomy and Oskar Klein Centre for Cosmoparticle Physics, AlbaNova University Centre, Stockholm, Sweden), Rolf A. Jansen (School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA), Zhiyuan Ji (Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA), David C. Koo (UCO/Lick Observatory, Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), Ray A. Lucas (Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA), Nir Mandelker (Racah Institute of Physics, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel), Vihang Mehta (IPAC, Caltech, Pasadena, CA, USA), Bahram Mobasher (Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Riverside, Riverside CA, USA), Kalina V. Nedkova (Department of Physics and Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA), Joel Primack (Department of Physics, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), Swara Ravindranath (Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA), Brant E. Robertson (Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), Michael J. Rutkowski (Department of Physics and Astronomy, Minnesota State University, Mankato, MN, USA), Zahra Sattari (The Observatories of the Carnegie Institution for Science, Pasadena, CA, USA), Emmaris Soto (Computational Physics, Inc., Springfield, VA, USA), L. Y. Aaron Yung (Astrophysics Science Division, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA)

arXiv: 2308.00041v1 - DOI (astro-ph.GA)
21 pages, 13 figures, Submitted to ApJ
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Giant star-forming clumps are a prominent feature of star-forming galaxies (SFGs) and contain important clues on galaxy formation and evolution. However, basic demographics of clumps and their host galaxies remain uncertain. Using the HST/WFC3 F275W images from the Ultraviolet Imaging of the Cosmic Assembly Near-infrared Deep Extragalactic Legacy Survey (UVCANDELS), we detect and analyze giant star-forming clumps in galaxies at 0.5 $\leq$ z $\leq$ 1, connecting two epochs when clumps are common (at cosmic high-noon, z $\sim$ 2) and rare (in the local universe). We construct a clump sample whose rest-frame 1600 {\AA} luminosity is 3 times higher than the most luminous local HII regions (M$_{UV} \leq -$16 AB). In our sample, 35 $\pm$ 3$\%$ of low-mass galaxies (log[M$_{*}$/M$_{\odot}$] $<$ 10) are clumpy (i.e., containing at least one off-center clump). This fraction changes to 22 $\pm$ 3$\%$ and 22 $\pm$ 4$\%$ for intermediate (10 $\leq$ log[M$_{*}$/M$_{\odot}$] $\leq$ 10.5) and high-mass (log[M$_{*}$/M$_{\odot}$] $>$ 10.5) galaxies in agreement with previous studies. When compared to similar-mass non-clumpy SFGs, low- and intermediate-mass clumpy SFGs tend to have higher SFRs and bluer rest-frame U-V colors, while high-mass clumpy SFGs tend to be larger than non-clumpy SFGs. However, clumpy and non-clumpy SFGs have similar S\'ersic index, indicating a similar underlying density profile. Furthermore, we investigate how UV luminosity of star-forming regions correlates with the physical properties of host galaxies. On average, more luminous star-forming regions reside in more luminous, smaller, and/or higher-specific SFR galaxies and are found closer to their hosts' galactic center.

Submitted to arXiv on 31 Jul. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2308.00041v1

Giant star-forming clumps are a significant characteristic of star-forming galaxies (SFGs) and provide valuable insights into galaxy formation and evolution. However, there is still uncertainty surrounding the basic demographics of these clumps and their host galaxies. In this study, the authors utilize images from the Ultraviolet Imaging of the Cosmic Assembly Near-infrared Deep Extragalactic Legacy Survey (UVCANDELS) taken by the Hubble Space Telescope's Wide Field Camera 3 (HST/WFC3) in order to detect and analyze giant star-forming clumps in galaxies at redshifts ranging from 0.5 to 1. By focusing on this particular redshift range, the authors bridge two epochs when clumps are known to be common (at cosmic high-noon, z ~ 2) and rare (in the local universe). They construct a clump sample that has a rest-frame 1600 Å luminosity three times higher than the most luminous local HII regions. The results show that approximately 35 ± 3% of low-mass galaxies (with a stellar mass less than log[M*/M⊙] < 10) contain at least one off-center clump. This fraction decreases to 22 ± 3% for intermediate-mass galaxies (with stellar masses ranging from log[M*/M⊙] = 10 to log[M*/M⊙] = 10.5), as well as for high-mass galaxies (with stellar masses greater than log[M*/M⊙] > 10.5), which is consistent with previous studies. Comparing clumpy SFGs with non-clumpy SFGs of similar mass, it is observed that low- and intermediate-mass clumpy SFGs tend to have higher star formation rates (SFRs) and bluer rest-frame U–V colors while high mass clumpy SFGs tend to be larger in size compared to non–clumpy SFGs but exhibit similar Sersic indices indicating a similar underlying density profile. Furthermore, this study investigates how the ultraviolet (UV) luminosity of star–forming regions correlates with physical properties of their host galaxies; on average more luminous star–forming regions are found in galaxies that are also more luminous, smaller in size, and/or have higher specific star formation rates while they tend to be located closer to galactic center of their host galaxies. In conclusion, this study provides valuable insights into demographics of giant star–forming clumps and their host galaxies at intermediate redshifts highlighting differences in properties between clumpy and non–clumpy SFGs of different mass ranges as well as shedding light on relationship between UV luminosity and galaxy properties; further research is needed to understand underlying mechanisms driving these differences and reconcile them with current galaxy formation scenarios.
Created on 06 Aug. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.