Towards Trustworthy and Aligned Machine Learning: A Data-centric Survey with Causality Perspectives
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Authors Haoyang Liu, Maheep Chaudhary, and Haohan Wang focus on trustworthiness in machine learning.
- Survey covers applications and research areas like robustness, security, interpretability, and fairness.
- Observes convergence of methods across trustworthy machine learning subfields due to Pearl's hierarchy of causality.
- Aims to provide a unified understanding of trustworthy machine learning development by connecting concepts to Pearl's causal hierarchy.
- Explores trustworthiness of large pretrained models with techniques such as fine-tuning, parameter-efficient fine-tuning, prompting, and reinforcement learning with human feedback.
- Connects these techniques to standard empirical risk minimization (ERM) training methods for a principled understanding in large pretrained models.
- Offers a detailed review of existing methods and insights into potential future aspects related to the survey findings.
- Links mathematical vocabulary across robustness, adversarial robustness, interpretability, and fairness to enhance overall field understanding.
Authors: Haoyang Liu, Maheep Chaudhary, Haohan Wang
Abstract: The trustworthiness of machine learning has emerged as a critical topic in the field, encompassing various applications and research areas such as robustness, security, interpretability, and fairness. The last decade saw the development of numerous methods addressing these challenges. In this survey, we systematically review these advancements from a data-centric perspective, highlighting the shortcomings of traditional empirical risk minimization (ERM) training in handling challenges posed by the data. Interestingly, we observe a convergence of these methods, despite being developed independently across trustworthy machine learning subfields. Pearl's hierarchy of causality offers a unifying framework for these techniques. Accordingly, this survey presents the background of trustworthy machine learning development using a unified set of concepts, connects this language to Pearl's causal hierarchy, and finally discusses methods explicitly inspired by causality literature. We provide a unified language with mathematical vocabulary to link these methods across robustness, adversarial robustness, interpretability, and fairness, fostering a more cohesive understanding of the field. Further, we explore the trustworthiness of large pretrained models. After summarizing dominant techniques like fine-tuning, parameter-efficient fine-tuning, prompting, and reinforcement learning with human feedback, we draw connections between them and the standard ERM. This connection allows us to build upon the principled understanding of trustworthy methods, extending it to these new techniques in large pretrained models, paving the way for future methods. Existing methods under this perspective are also reviewed. Lastly, we offer a brief summary of the applications of these methods and discuss potential future aspects related to our survey. For more information, please visit http://trustai.one.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.