Towards Trustworthy and Aligned Machine Learning: A Data-centric Survey with Causality Perspectives

AI-generated keywords: Trustworthy Machine Learning Causality Perspectives Convergence of Methods Large Pretrained Models Unified Understanding

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Authors Haoyang Liu, Maheep Chaudhary, and Haohan Wang focus on trustworthiness in machine learning.
  • Survey covers applications and research areas like robustness, security, interpretability, and fairness.
  • Observes convergence of methods across trustworthy machine learning subfields due to Pearl's hierarchy of causality.
  • Aims to provide a unified understanding of trustworthy machine learning development by connecting concepts to Pearl's causal hierarchy.
  • Explores trustworthiness of large pretrained models with techniques such as fine-tuning, parameter-efficient fine-tuning, prompting, and reinforcement learning with human feedback.
  • Connects these techniques to standard empirical risk minimization (ERM) training methods for a principled understanding in large pretrained models.
  • Offers a detailed review of existing methods and insights into potential future aspects related to the survey findings.
  • Links mathematical vocabulary across robustness, adversarial robustness, interpretability, and fairness to enhance overall field understanding.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Haoyang Liu, Maheep Chaudhary, Haohan Wang

47 pages, 13 figures

Abstract: The trustworthiness of machine learning has emerged as a critical topic in the field, encompassing various applications and research areas such as robustness, security, interpretability, and fairness. The last decade saw the development of numerous methods addressing these challenges. In this survey, we systematically review these advancements from a data-centric perspective, highlighting the shortcomings of traditional empirical risk minimization (ERM) training in handling challenges posed by the data. Interestingly, we observe a convergence of these methods, despite being developed independently across trustworthy machine learning subfields. Pearl's hierarchy of causality offers a unifying framework for these techniques. Accordingly, this survey presents the background of trustworthy machine learning development using a unified set of concepts, connects this language to Pearl's causal hierarchy, and finally discusses methods explicitly inspired by causality literature. We provide a unified language with mathematical vocabulary to link these methods across robustness, adversarial robustness, interpretability, and fairness, fostering a more cohesive understanding of the field. Further, we explore the trustworthiness of large pretrained models. After summarizing dominant techniques like fine-tuning, parameter-efficient fine-tuning, prompting, and reinforcement learning with human feedback, we draw connections between them and the standard ERM. This connection allows us to build upon the principled understanding of trustworthy methods, extending it to these new techniques in large pretrained models, paving the way for future methods. Existing methods under this perspective are also reviewed. Lastly, we offer a brief summary of the applications of these methods and discuss potential future aspects related to our survey. For more information, please visit http://trustai.one.

Submitted to arXiv on 31 Jul. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2307.16851v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their comprehensive survey titled "Towards Trustworthy and Aligned Machine Learning: A Data-centric Survey with Causality Perspectives," authors Haoyang Liu, Maheep Chaudhary, and Haohan Wang delve into the critical topic of trustworthiness in machine learning. The survey covers a wide range of applications and research areas such as robustness, security, interpretability, and fairness, highlighting the advancements made over the last decade to address these challenges. One key observation made by the authors is the convergence of methods developed independently across various trustworthy machine learning subfields. They attribute this convergence to Pearl's hierarchy of causality, which provides a unifying framework for understanding these techniques. By presenting a unified set of concepts and connecting them to Pearl's causal hierarchy, the authors aim to foster a more cohesive understanding of trustworthy machine learning development. The survey also explores the trustworthiness of large pretrained models, summarizing dominant techniques like fine-tuning, parameter-efficient fine-tuning, prompting, and reinforcement learning with human feedback. By drawing connections between these techniques and standard empirical risk minimization (ERM) training methods, the authors extend the principled understanding of trustworthy methods to new approaches in large pretrained models. Furthermore,the authors provide a detailed review of existing methods under this perspective and offer insights into potential future aspects related to their survey findings. By linking mathematical vocabulary across robustness, adversarial robustness, interpretability,and fairness , they aim to enhance the field's overall understanding. Overall,this survey serves as a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners in machine learning seeking to deepen their knowledge of trustworthy methodologies.For more information on this topic , readers are encouraged to visit http://trustai.one.
Created on 26 Jun. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.