Only-child matching penalty in the marriage market

AI-generated keywords: Marriage matching Only-child individuals Partner selection Socio-economic status Assortative mating

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Authors Keisuke Kawata and Mizuki Komura conducted a study on marriage matching of only-child individuals and its outcomes
  • Research focused on two main aspects:
  • Investigating how marital status differed between only children and non-only children
  • Measuring the premium or penalty in socio-economic status (SES) based on partner selection
  • First aspect aimed to determine if partners were selected in a positive or negative assortative manner based on only-child status, examining benefits or penalties for only-child individuals in the marriage market
  • Second aspect looked at the gap in years of schooling between partners of only-child and non-only-child individuals
  • Predicted that only-children would face a matching penalty, particularly when their partner was also an only child, based on economic theory and observed patterns of positive assortative mating among only-child individuals
  • Findings confirmed this prediction, with women marrying an only-child husband experiencing a penalty of 0.57 years lower educational attainment compared to non-only-child partners
  • Research highlights challenges faced by only-child individuals in partner selection within the marriage market and potential disparities in educational attainment based on partner's only-child status
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Keisuke Kawata, Mizuki Komura

Abstract: This study explores the marriage matching of only-child individuals and its outcome. Specifically, we analyze two aspects. First, we investigate how marital status (i.e., marriage with an only child, that with a non-only child and remaining single) differs between only children and non-only children. This analysis allows us to know whether people choose mates in a positive or a negative assortative manner regarding only-child status, and to predict whether only-child individuals benefit from marriage matching premiums or are subject to penalties regarding partner attractiveness. Second, we measure the premium/penalty by the size of the gap in partner's socio economic status (SES, here, years of schooling) between only-child and non--only-child individuals. The conventional economic theory and the observed marriage patterns of positive assortative mating on only-child status predict that only-child individuals are subject to a matching penalty in the marriage market, especially when their partner is also an only child. Furthermore, our estimation confirms that among especially women marrying an only-child husband, only children are penalized in terms of 0.57-years-lower educational attainment on the part of the partner.

Submitted to arXiv on 28 Jul. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2307.15336v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

Authors Keisuke Kawata and Mizuki Komura conducted a study on the marriage matching of only-child individuals and its outcomes. The research focused on two main aspects: investigating how marital status differed between only children and non-only children, and measuring the premium or penalty in socio-economic status (SES) based on partner selection. The first aspect aimed to determine whether individuals selected partners in a positive or negative assortative manner based on their only-child status, while also examining potential benefits or penalties for only-child individuals within the marriage market. The second aspect specifically looked at the gap in years of schooling between partners of only-child and non-only-child individuals. Based on conventional economic theory and observed patterns of positive assortative mating among only-child individuals, the researchers predicted that only-children would face a matching penalty in the marriage market, particularly when their partner was also an only child. The study's findings confirmed this prediction, with women marrying an only-child husband experiencing a penalty in terms of their partner having 0.57 years lower educational attainment compared to non-only-child partners. This research sheds light on the challenges faced by only-child individuals in selecting partners within the marriage market and highlights potential disparities in educational attainment based on their partner's only-child status. It provides valuable insights into the dynamics of marriage matching for this demographic group and underscores the complexities involved in partner selection.
Created on 14 Jun. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.